Re: [Talk-GB] Public Rights of Way data for Cambridgeshire
It's interesting to compare their approach with that of the capital of what used to be one of the most closed countries: the Municipality of Tirana (Albania) is now putting (some of) its data online voluntarily, in co-operation with the local hackerspace. http://opendata.tirana.al/ They haven't seen the need to provide an English translation of the pages, but many of the subject area titles are guessable without knowledge of Albanian, and Google Translate knows Albanian. I've been working with the Tirana hackerspace in mapping parts of the country, and when I commented it would be nice to get plans of the underground Cold War bunker complex that now houses the exhibition "Bunkart", one phone call was enough to arrange access to the data (not yet processed, though). On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Dave Fwrote: > Great Scott! Like wading through treacle. I admire your perseverance. > > Did you ever get a reason as to why they were being so restrictive? Empire > building? 'Knowledge is power?' > > After seeing the long list of other local authorities who had released > their data you'd have thought they would realise they were being a bit > siliy. > > Not only time, but /so/ much money wasted. > > Dave F. > > > On 11/05/2017 00:20, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > >> After a rather long battle... >> > > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] the steepest residential street in England
North Lane in Bath ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2955824#map=19/51.37754/-2.33364) is very steep, but only side entrances to houses open onto it, so I'm not sure whether it counts fully as residential. __John On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Dave Fwrote: > > On 12/01/2017 01:02, Robert Norris wrote: > >> Ffordd_Pen_Llech is steep but it's one way (down), so if you're looking >> for challenge to go up it on your bicycle you have to do so illegally. >> >> Apparently Vale Street (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32024547) in >> Bristol is meant to be very steep, but I don't know the incline. (Doesn't >> seem to have incline posted looking at GSV. DaveF: Was this the road you >> were thinking of or something in Bath?) >> > > Just outside: > https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.3977312,-2.2940096,3a,88.4 > y,62.25h,61.15t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sedHvMRtPcF5jZw2uQdD4Hw!2e0 > > It may not be the steepest, but it gives your calf muscles a good work > out. That bend in the road is the real killer on a bike. > > DaveF > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] City names translation
I hadn't known (or remembered) that recommendation from the wiki; but still, the Ukrainian spelling (resulting in a Ukrainian reader understanding it as a reasonable phonetic imitation of the English name) may often be very far from a transliteration (letter-for-letting substitution) from the English name. I'll put Towcester forward as an example! (For those not familiar with it: it's pronounced like Toaster.) __John On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Ed Loach edlo...@gmail.com wrote: Since English has non-phonetic spelling (and some placenames are particularly non-phonetic) there's no solid base for automatic transliteration to something meaningful in another script, so I think it's reasonable to put the Ukrainian spelling in explicitly, for places for which such a spelling is established.. Perhaps in the cast of non-phonetic places there is some argument that such names could possibly be added, but looking at Pavlo's proposed cities I noticed Chelmsford which already has two Cyrillic language transliterations I feel would be better removed. There is a bit in the wiki which recommends avoiding transliterations: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration Speaking of an on the ground example, a few years ago I visited Crete and while all signs were in Greek, some of the tourist ones were also in a Roman script (I can't claim English - a name is a name). One particular place we wanted to visit we struggled to find on the map, and it was only when we were driving in the area we found that the translation from Greek in the guide book we'd read in advance, and the translation and the map and the translation on the sign post were three different translations. In this instance (if I'd been an OSM mapper at the time) I'd have added a name:en of what was on the sign, though as noted above it isn't technically en. I suspect the three different translations were transliterations of different ways it was pronounced. As far as I know Chelmsford has no cyrillic translations on their signs. Ed ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] BBC article on volunteers mapping hillforts
No mention of OSM that I can see, though; a different kind of mapping: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-23203500 http://www.arch.ox.ac.uk/hillforts-atlas.html __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple ways when road is not divided
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:06 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote: What do people think of this: http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm ) and this: http://osm.org/go/eu6_VCkLp-- (aerial: http://binged.it/16js1Ye ) I like these (although the first one isn't quite optimal, I might have a go at improving it soon); I'm thinking particularly of navigation for the blind, where a lot of detail is useful. It could also be useful for people planning outsize load HGV movements. I don't think it's too cluttered; it's simply a complicated piece of road layout, and the map reflects it. __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Pronunciation of place names
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: My friend Terence Eden has some interesting comments on documenting the pronunciation of place names, in this blog post: Can we solve the problem of how to do this, in OSM? We could have a keyword convention for indicating the pronunciation (in various languages) using the International Phonetic Alphabet; for example, we could supplement name:language=* with name:language:IPA=* __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Added road schemes announced in the Autumn Statement in OSM
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote: On 10/12/2012 08:18, Kevin Peat wrote: On Dec 10, 2012 1:25 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote No. We should be mapping physical objects... There are plenty of non-physical objects mapped in OSM As primary tags? Yes --- administrative boundaries, for example. __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] PRoW Ref codes (WAS:Hampshire Rights of Way Data released under OS OpenData licence)
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote: Is it not sensible to use the reference format of the place you are in, rather than create some sudo standard? A web application I'm developing straddles many counties. So I've decided to adopt the scheme: code-for-council:code-for-path-adopted-by-council I think this is a way of doing what you suggest, i.e. using the reference format of the place you're in (along with the necessary indication of what place you are in). An alternative would be to use the council's own code, and then in another tag (or in a relation, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Is_In) indicating which county it is in. But that seems a roundabout way of doing it, harder both to use and to map. __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Post boxes!
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote: Was thinking more along the line of asking him is he minds us using his photos to add the extra details to OSM (e.g. ref numbers, collection times, and royal cyphers). Or we could invite him to sign up to OSM himself! __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Remapping update
I started to work on Hampshire, but got the following request from a decliner: I was wondering if you would mind refraining from 're-mapping' my contributions for the time being? I'm still in discussions with the OSMF regarding re-licensing some of my contributions which come from a 3rd party source not compatible with the new terms. Obviously we hope to have concluded this work before the 1st of April deadline. In the meantime the more of my contributions that are deleted means more work for me to put right once we get the licensing sorted. I think the time's getting close enough that I'll resume that work anyway. __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Vandalism changeset
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Oliver O'Brien m...@oliverobrien.co.uk wrote: Hi This appears to be a vandalism changeset: 10947970 Details: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10947970 It would be great if there was a report obvious vandalism button on Changeset information pages. I think we are being too nice if we assume that edits like this might be someone new Or perhaps it could be the sort of thing you get by trying to pan the map while having a way selected, I've seen that before. __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Vandalism changeset
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Odd Gustafsson odd_lars...@hotmail.com wrote: Yeah, adding: bridge=yes, foot=no, layer=5, oneway=-1 and surface=grass, to a road happens to me all the time ;) Sorry, didn't look closely enough! I just saw the odd-shaped road. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] License changeover - Important West Country update
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote: Contributor Guy has now accepted the new contributor terms and OSMI License View is already showing the new picture [1]. I had done some remapping in that area, before Guy agreed --- could someone now revert those changes, please? I've put them at the top http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GB_revert_request_log Some of them have other edits on top of them by now, but those are also remapping and can presumably also be reverted. __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-gb-midanglia] Spagehtti junctions in Cambridge and St Ives
I've looked a bit further into disabled access to crossings, and raised it on the accessability mailing list, and found that there is a proposal to map crossing islands already (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traffic_island). After mailing about this, I then realized that it might be good to mark routes through a crossing (particularly for the type of traffic island which has two crossings onto it that aren't opposite each other); and someone on the accessibility list found that crossing is already used as a way as well as as a node. __John ___ Talk-gb-midanglia mailing list Talk-gb-midanglia@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-midanglia
Re: [Talk-GB] Pigging potlach ...
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote: Also, can you describe the freeze? ... As Richard (albeit fairly bluntly) said, we've not heard similar reports from other people, but they might just be silently enduring it. Any further help you can give us to get to the root cause would be awesome. The slowdown I notice is on a single-core 512Mb machine, and I haven't looked into full system statistics for it but the behaviour is consistent with thrashing virtual memory... after editing for a while, drawing ways with the mouse gets very slow (almost freezes); I think I found the browser process had got very large, but I can't remember. I just guessed that the code to search for whether the mouse was currently on an existing node was looking through more stuff than would fit in RAM, that was what the behaviour felt consistent with. I can investigate further if you like, but are people concerned with such small machines (other than as thin clients) these days anyway? (It might be of concern for mappers in poor countries getting second-hand machines, for example.) __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Pigging potlach ...
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: I think there's always been a memory leak there with P2; I've noticed that sort of behaviour for months. I've only done minimal bits of delving into it, but suspect it's a case of _either_ some sprites being left on the display list (maybe the invisible sprites which P2 uses to define hit zones for each way/node), or that the event listeners by which Flash responds to mouse clicks (and other events) aren't being cleared properly. Something like one of those would be consistent with what I'm seeing. It doesn't happen on a larger machine, so I don't think it's just a matter of the hit zone algorithm scaling poorly. Unfortunately it's not trivial to debug - I think this sort of thing is the way that Adobe makes their money from Flash (i.e. you need to buy Flash Builder for the profiling tools). But that's not to say it's impossible, and I'd very much like to do so. Another oddity I've noticed (also probably deep within Flash) is that P2 sometimes either doesn't respond to a keypress but does to the corresponding mouse click, or just responds much slower to the keypress. (I notice this with add in advanced mode, versus the + key.) But I guess that by its nature Flash is more mouse-oriented than keyboard-oriented, so this may be inherent to Flash rather than specific to P2. (Incidentally, one simple thing you can do to speed P2 up is to clear any GPS traces you're no longer using - it's easy to forget that you have, in effect, a whole bunch of 1000-node ways sitting around!) I don't think that's what's happening here (I get the effect without any GPS traces loaded). I can investigate further if you like, but are people concerned with such small machines (other than as thin clients) these days anyway? Please do. I am interested, definitely - P2 should aim to run efficiently on any machine :) (and it's not entirely altruistic, as one of the machines I use regularly is a 2004 PowerPC Mac). Next time it does it, I'll run top and get the process size, memory usage, etc, for a start. __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Project Drake - mapping the University of Cambridge
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote: What do other people think? If there's a strong view not to have these parenthesised bits there, I'll take them out of the name tags. I think it would be best to have the information somewhere, in a consistent form (this probably means always using the same tag), but for it not to be in the name tag. I'm not sure what the tag should be, I don't think operator sounds right. Perhaps affiliation? (I know someone with good knowledge of CU formalities and terminology, and will ask him for suggestions.) __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 November 2011 10:02, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote: . Yes, “Former Brewery” is the former Ridley’s site. Bishop Nick launched their first beer at The Compasses, Littley Green (next village over) recently; their old brewery tap. Not sure what the site used for now, but am about to change “name” to “description” as it has never been called “Former Brewery”. Maybe 'Former' in the name is a bit of a giveaway and I should filter those out of the tagQueries list Yes, Former is probably unambiguous, but note that the Bushmills distillery (Co Antrim, Northern Ireland) is called The Old Bushmills Distillery although it is still their working distillery! __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
I'm sure this is a cider brewery, I've driven past it quite a few times and remember seeing the signage. (I used to live near Limerick). I don't know of any beers from Bulmers, I'm pretty sure they're only ciders. __John On 11/20/11, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: This was supposed to go to the list, sorry! On 20 November 2011 15:30, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am just looking through the BrewMap http://brewmap.maps3.org.uk tagQueries http://brewmap.maps3.org.uk/client/tagQueries.html page and am curious about the Bulmers brewery which is east of Limerick ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34929891). Do you think it is safe to assume that this is a cider producer (industrial=cider), or do Bulmers brew beer too? Just trying to reduce the number on the list! Graham. -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Borbus bor...@gmail.com wrote: distillery=whisky Do we need to make a distinction between whisky and whiskey? I don't know much about whiskey, I seem to remember the difference is more than just spelling. Whisky (Scottish) is distilled twice (and the smoke used to dry the grain passes through the grain); Whiskey (Irish) is distilled three times, and the grain is dried by heat, but the smoke doesn't pass through it. So yes, there is a difference, not much, but we might as well map it. __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Drinking Map of UK
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Graham the one or two vineyards in the South There's some disgreement on how to tag these (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Vineyard), between landuse=vineyard and landuse=agriculture produce=grape (I'm inclined to use the former.) and what do you call places where they make cider/perry? press? __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Historic Features
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am interested in creating maps of historical features (e.g all roman remains, medieval things, World War 2 things etc.). This could be extended to cover more everyday things, I suppose, but that would require special attention by the ordinary renderers. For example, old routes of roads that have been re-aligned could be marked with the usual highway=... and also with an indication of when it went out of use. However, to keep things simple for renderers (and fewer tests in their code) it might be better to use some new key such as historic_highway= __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] How to tag Police Memorial Trust (and similar) memorials
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: I recently mapped a couple of Police Memorial Trust memorials, for example: http://www.policememorial.org.uk/Police_Memorial_Trust/PMT_Local_Memorials/PMT-Swindells-2004/PMT-Swindells-2004.htm http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.511667lon=-1.866628zoom=18layers=M http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1478159796 with Tag:historic=memorial. I included the text on each memorial, tagged text. Would that be better tagged inscription, or with some other tag? I've used commemoration on a couple of memorial benches in my village, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1419167468, but now you mention it, inscription sounds more generic, as there might be inscribed public objects that aren't commemorative. __John ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-gb-midanglia] Marker Posts
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Nicola Smith nicolasmit...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All, I appreciate it is something we don't necessarily map, but has anyone seen any gas/oil marker posts on their travels? I am interested in the sub-surface layout Me too --- I've been mapping quite a few powerlines, and would like to get pipelines but haven't managed to spot many. and wonderered if anyone had seen any markers that they could let me know about. I noticed something on the road going north-east from Six Mile Bottom (maybe around http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.1985273063183lon=0.28215765953064zoom=18 but I can't remember exactly), I think it was a white-and-orange banded post; I've been meaning to go back and investigate. There's a gas compressor station fairly nearby (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.1847850084305lon=0.270532965660095zoom=18) and I suspect it's connected with that. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.2105194628239lon=0.259908735752106zoom=17 I found a water pipeline (which I've tagged; it's visible on osmarender but not mapnik) as there's a marker sign (like the fire hydrant signs, but blue) where it crosses the road, and there's a marker post where it meets the track going southeast from the road. I traced it as far as I could from the bing photos, as it shows as a disturbance in the fields. There's some kind of pumping station at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.1787299215794layers=Olon=0.295938849449158zoom=17, and I could see a faint mark on bing showing a pipeline leading to it (again visible on osmarender). I suspect that one's water, as it leads close to the Fleam Dyke Pumping Station, which is a groundwater extraction plant. There's a big gas pumping station at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.4599286913872layers=Olon=0.842409431934357zoom=17 and again I managed to deduce a short section of pipeline from bing. Any of these might be useful starting points for looking for posts. I'll go back to the Six Mile Bottom road one in the next few days and get the exact location (it's within a couple of miles of my house). I also remember someone mentioning a gas pumping station near Duxford, so that might be a good place to start looking around for posts. __John ___ Talk-gb-midanglia mailing list Talk-gb-midanglia@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-midanglia
Re: [Talk-gb-midanglia] Marker Posts
There's also a water pipeline heading northeast (again, visible on osmarender) at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.2165490686893lon=0.0422796607017517zoom=17 -- I remember it being built (I used to live near there). Again, I traced it as far as I could from bing. __John ___ Talk-gb-midanglia mailing list Talk-gb-midanglia@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-midanglia