Re: [Talk-GB] River Severn riverbank not redering

2016-10-07 Thread Dave F 


On 07/10/2016 13:03, Gregory wrote:


Is the issue/bug reported to Mapnik?




The shared node problem? I don't know. Certainly not by me.
I've become increasingly reluctant to report issues like this. Not 
solely to mapnik carto but all data users. But I think that's for a 
separate posting.


Dave F.

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] River Severn riverbank not redering

2016-10-07 Thread Gregory 
Is the issue/bug reported to Mapnik?

>From the base of Newcastle "Monument",
Greg.

On Oct 7, 2016 12:02 PM, "Dave F"  wrote:

> On 07/10/2016 11:54, Jez Nicholson wrote:
>
>> because it's the only *riverbank* section with a name?
>>
>
> Not true.
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] River Severn riverbank not redering

2016-10-07 Thread Dave F 

On 07/10/2016 11:54, Jez Nicholson wrote:

because it's the only *riverbank* section with a name?


Not true.



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] River Severn riverbank not redering

2016-10-07 Thread Dave F 

Fixed

http://osm.org/go/euwo8goAQ?m=

It appears that, for some reason, mapnik render (I think it is just this 
one) gets confused when the start/end of a closed polygon shares a node 
with another closed polygon. I've moved it & it now renders


Dave F.

On 07/10/2016 11:29, Ian Caldwell wrote:


On 7 October 2016 at 11:03, Jez Nicholson > wrote:


because it's the only section with a name?


The next section to the north also has a name and that is rendered.


Ian


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] River Severn riverbank not redering

2016-10-07 Thread Jez Nicholson 
because it's the only *riverbank* section with a name?the other names
come from the river lines (?)

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 at 11:29 Ian Caldwell 
wrote:

>
> On 7 October 2016 at 11:03, Jez Nicholson  wrote:
>
> because it's the only section with a name?
>
>
> The next section to the north also has a name and that is rendered.
>
>
> Ian
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] River Severn riverbank not redering

2016-10-07 Thread Ian Caldwell 
On 7 October 2016 at 11:03, Jez Nicholson  wrote:

> because it's the only section with a name?


The next section to the north also has a name and that is rendered.


Ian
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] River Severn riverbank not redering

2016-10-07 Thread Jez Nicholson 
because it's the only section with a name?

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 at 10:57 Ian Caldwell 
wrote:

> Just noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72551464 is not being
> rendered on the  standard map. It has not been edited for two years and the
> adjoining riverbanks are being rendered. Anybody know why?
>
> Ian
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] River Severn riverbank not redering

2016-10-07 Thread Ian Caldwell 
Just noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72551464 is not being
rendered on the  standard map. It has not been edited for two years and the
adjoining riverbanks are being rendered. Anybody know why?

Ian
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb