Re: [Talk-GB] Wish LIst for Mapnik Stylesheet (overmapping of private features)
On 10 September 2013 12:00, Craig Loftus wrote: >> I would hope that whoever might fix the bugs in the rendering >> stylesheet would start with those rather than discard all of them and >> start with a new bug list on github. > > That is step 3 on the roadmap described on the openstreetmap-carto repo: > > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto#tackle-the-backlog-v3x > > I am appreciate that the "patches welcome" response is not tremendously > positive, but, culling issues from trac and transferring them over to the > github issue tracker would be a quick and easy way to help getting the > issues you care about fixed. Copying issues over to github does not help get them "fixed". I know there are issues in trac, and I'll get to them later, since new features are not the current priority. If people want to help, without writing any stylesheets, then at least curating the tickets on trac would help. The very first on on the list (#4436) has got nothing to do with the stylesheets, for example. Thanks, Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Wish LIst for Mapnik Stylesheet (overmapping of private features)
> I would hope that whoever might fix the bugs in the rendering > stylesheet would start with those rather than discard all of them and > start with a new bug list on github. That is step 3 on the roadmap described on the openstreetmap-carto repo: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto#tackle-the-backlog-v3x I am appreciate that the "patches welcome" response is not tremendously positive, but, culling issues from trac and transferring them over to the github issue tracker would be a quick and easy way to help getting the issues you care about fixed. Regards, Craig On 8 September 2013 17:19, Andrew M. Bishop wrote: > Chris Fleming writes: > > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:45:51PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote: > >> Is there a mechanism for getting requests onto the wish list for the > >> Open Street Map Mapnk style sheets? > > > I would look at adding an Issue to the github project: > > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto > > There are already 439 open tickets in the OSM trac system for mapnik > rendering: > > https://trac.openstreetmap.org/query?status=!closed&component=mapnik > > I would hope that whoever might fix the bugs in the rendering > stylesheet would start with those rather than discard all of them and > start with a new bug list on github. > > -- > Andrew. > -- > Andrew M. Bishop http://www.gedanken.org.uk/mapping/ > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Wish LIst for Mapnik Stylesheet (overmapping of private features)
Chris Fleming writes: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:45:51PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote: >> Is there a mechanism for getting requests onto the wish list for the >> Open Street Map Mapnk style sheets? > I would look at adding an Issue to the github project: > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto There are already 439 open tickets in the OSM trac system for mapnik rendering: https://trac.openstreetmap.org/query?status=!closed&component=mapnik I would hope that whoever might fix the bugs in the rendering stylesheet would start with those rather than discard all of them and start with a new bug list on github. -- Andrew. -- Andrew M. Bishop http://www.gedanken.org.uk/mapping/ ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Wish LIst for Mapnik Stylesheet (overmapping of private features)
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:45:51PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote: > Is there a mechanism for getting requests onto the wish list for the > Open Street Map Mapnk style sheets? > > The particular issue is that now that people can trace quite small > features, some areas are getting overloaded with private foot paths > and private car parks (not to mention alleys and driveways), > particularly where apartment blocks are involved. These make it > difficult to find public ones and pollute the landuse colouring. > > I've added a comment to the access Wiki page, but comments on wiki > pages don't seem to get looked at. What I'd like to do is to get onto > the wish list that private features like this should require a higher > zoom level, before they render, than equivalent public ones. (A thin, > dotted footpath can be difficult to spot in a sea of dashed ping > lines. > > (A secondary problem is that people map these all with no access > restriction, or name them Private, but that can be fixed in the source > data without destroying information - the only problem is that it > needs verifying on the ground, whereas they can map, particularly car > parks, from aerial imagery.) I would look at adding an Issue to the github project: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto Cheers Chris -- e: m...@chrisfleming.org m: 07980 214061 w: http://chrisfleming.org/ t: @chrisfl ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Wish LIst for Mapnik Stylesheet (overmapping of private features)
Is there a mechanism for getting requests onto the wish list for the Open Street Map Mapnk style sheets? The particular issue is that now that people can trace quite small features, some areas are getting overloaded with private foot paths and private car parks (not to mention alleys and driveways), particularly where apartment blocks are involved. These make it difficult to find public ones and pollute the landuse colouring. I've added a comment to the access Wiki page, but comments on wiki pages don't seem to get looked at. What I'd like to do is to get onto the wish list that private features like this should require a higher zoom level, before they render, than equivalent public ones. (A thin, dotted footpath can be difficult to spot in a sea of dashed ping lines. (A secondary problem is that people map these all with no access restriction, or name them Private, but that can be fixed in the source data without destroying information - the only problem is that it needs verifying on the ground, whereas they can map, particularly car parks, from aerial imagery.) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
