I think the original email makes more sense as a discussion point if instead of
being about deleting data it's more about getting started early on the
problem of re-surveying data which might be removed.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jun 12, 2011, at 18:16, Adam Hoyle adam.li...@dotankstudios.com wrote:
Wow, what an incendiary email, I presume that was intentional and so as an
outsider I feel compelled to respond with these 3 thoughts:
1) Unnecessary destruction of data seems particularly short sighted (maybe it
is necessary, I'm not equipped to judge to be honest).
2) The points that are in the link in your email all seem perfectly
reasonable, which makes me wonder what your objections to them are.
3) Are you carrying out some-kind of personal vendetta (or are you leading a
group vendetta) against this TimSC person? I only ask because that is how it
comes across to someone who is not at all engaged in the politics and history
of involvement behind the open street map project.
Adam
On 12 Jun 2011, at 15:44, Andrew wrote:
There are many landuse polygons in the London area that were created by user
TimSC, who has not yet accepted the Contributor Terms. They will all be
purged
from the database when the licence changes if he continues not to do so.
TimSC
is now demanding changes to the way OSM is run with the treat of not
accepting
the CTs. (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.legal/6102)
I
believe that, whatever the merits what he wants are, his methods are
unacceptable and the community should reject them.
I therefore propose to delete every landuse polygon that TimSC created with
the hope that they will eventually be replaced with polygons based on high-
resolution imagery and ground surveys that we can use going forwards.
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb