Re: [Talk-GB] Roundabouts one piece or segregated

[Dave F via Talk-GB]

On 23/12/2019 18:28, David Woolley wrote:

On 23/12/2019 18:15, Nick Allen wrote:
I may be missing something here, but 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477263099 looks okay to me.




The OP was proposing that 
, 
, and 

Re: [Talk-GB] Roundabouts one piece or segregated

[Nick Allen]

Hi,
Yes, but the way it is currently mapped is the way I would chose, and
have utilised on many roundabouts for public transport &  cycle
routes. 
Has something changed? If so I wasn't aware?
Regards
NickTallguy
On Mon, 2019-12-23 at 18:28 +, David Woolley wrote:
> On 23/12/2019 18:15, Nick Allen wrote:
> I may be missing something here, but 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477263099 looks okay to me.
> 
> 
> The OP was proposing that <
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477263099>, <
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757674481>, and <
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757543147 should be merged into a,
> single, closed loop.
> ___Talk-GB mailing
> listtalk...@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Roundabouts one piece or segregated

[David Woolley]

On 23/12/2019 18:15, Nick Allen wrote:
I may be missing something here, but 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477263099 looks okay to me.





The OP was proposing that , 
, and 

Re: [Talk-GB] Roundabouts one piece or segregated

[Nick Allen]

Hi,

I may be missing something here, but 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477263099 looks okay to me. 

The wiki at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Public_transport_routes
 didn't give me any clues either.

Regards

Nick
(Tallguy)

On Mon, 2019-12-23 at 14:08 +1100, Warin wrote:
> I'm looking at Wivenhoe B1028 way 477263099.
> This is a segment of a roundabout.
> 
> Would it not be better for the way to be a single feature in OSM?
> 
> I think the route relations now handle roundabouts so there should be no 
> problem there.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Roundabouts one piece or segregated

[David Woolley via Talk-GB]

On 23/12/2019 03:08, Warin wrote:

I'm looking at Wivenhoe B1028 way 477263099.
This is a segment of a roundabout.

Would it not be better for the way to be a single feature in OSM?


It is rarely a good idea to revert from more concrete to more abstract, 
so I would say no.


Incidentally, many things mapped as roundabouts aren't legally 
roundabouts, but rather traffic circles.


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb