Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] Import Progress

2017-03-24 Thread Andy Robinson
Harry, and everyone else, 
I'm sure Brian will get back to everyone on all of this when he's back in 
circulation. He's not been around since these issues were raised. There is 
obviously a lot to digest and clearly there are some specific points to take on 
board so I'm sure when he's had time to go through everything we can move on.

Cheers and happy mapping.

Andy

-Original Message-
From: Harry Wood [mailto:m...@harrywood.co.uk] 
Sent: 24 March 2017 15:18
To: Andy Townsend; Andy Mabbett
Cc: talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Import Progress

I've created a wiki page specifically about the tree data import.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data

It would be better if somebody involved in running the import, would do this 
(per the Import Guidelines), but I've drawn together various info I could find 
from Brian's blog posts, and from poking at the data myself.

I didn't poke at the origin data. We could document the complete list of fields 
they provide.
Also is the whole data set is now imported? I count ~43000 nodes, but Brian's 
blog mentions 76,000 trees. How many changesets was that? To what extent has 
the data now been modified after import? What is 'usrn'?

Harry

Andy Townsend wrote:
> If it exists, an actual link would be really useful here.  I'm aware 
> of 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/2017-Ma
> rch/002127.html but that is by no means a "well-defined and 
> transparent plan".
...
> It'd be great to be able to move forward here - to identify the parts 
> of the process that were missed, to have a discussion about tags 
> (including answering e.g. Will's questions from 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-March/020058.ht
> ml ).  The replies to this thread make it pretty clear that the West 
> Midlands group has some work to do to persuade the majority of the UK 
> OSM community that the approach taken so far is a good one.

___
Talk-GB mailing list
talk...@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands


Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] Import Progress

2017-03-24 Thread Harry Wood
I've created a wiki page specifically about the tree data import.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data

It would be better if somebody involved in running the import, would do this 
(per the Import Guidelines), but I've drawn together various info I could find 
from Brian's blog posts, and from poking at the data myself.

I didn't poke at the origin data. We could document the complete list of fields 
they provide.
Also is the whole data set is now imported? I count ~43000 nodes, but Brian's 
blog mentions 76,000 trees. How many changesets was that? To what extent has 
the data now been modified after import? What is 'usrn'?

Harry

Andy Townsend wrote:
> If it exists, an actual link would be really useful here.  I'm aware of 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/2017-March/002127.html
>  
> but that is by no means a "well-defined and transparent plan". 
...
> It'd be great to be able to move forward here - to identify the parts of 
> the process that were missed, to have a discussion about tags (including 
> answering e.g. Will's questions from 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-March/020058.html 
> ).  The replies to this thread make it pretty clear that the West 
> Midlands group has some work to do to persuade the majority of the UK 
> OSM community that the approach taken so far is a good one.

___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands