Hello,
just to make the second method discribed by David a little bit more concrete:
You model the riverbank (some say riverbed) with the island as a hole.
At least the outer bound (way/ways) is tagged with waterway=riverbank,
or you can tag the whole relation (multipolygon).
You can use several ways for discribing the bounds as long as they are
connected. Details can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon
In any way the 'main' river way should be kept in addition to the riverbank.
regards
Olaf Hasemann
Am Montag, 22. Februar 2010 13:05 schrieb David Groom:
> Pierre
>
> These additional ways are not duplicates, as they do not follow the same
> path as the main river. If you delete the shorter ways then the islands
> will "disappear" from the map.
>
> There are two possible methods of mapping these islands.
>
> 1) the simple method, which has been used in your example, where the main
> river is drawn as one way, and the path of the river round an island is
> drawn as another way.
>
> 2) use areas and relations, here the main "outside of the river" would be
> drawn as one way, the island would be drawn as another way, and both would
> be added to a multipolygon relation.
>
> David
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Pierre Beland
> To: talk-ht@openstreetmap.org
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 2:09 AM
> Subject: [Talk-ht] River ways : How to treat Duplicates
>
>
>
>
> Before deleting duplicate ways for rivers, I want your advice.
>
> For Example, Les Trois Rivières, way=49375347 is the main river way. But
> we also find few ways that trace a second route around islands : ways
> 48392811, 48392826, 48475427, 48475510, 48475442, 48474646, 48476419,
> 48474401, 48477201, 48474784, 48475251. Should these segments be considered
> as duplicates and deleted
>
>
> Pierre Beland
>
>
>
> ---
>---
>
>
> ___
> Talk-ht mailing list
> Talk-ht@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ht
___
Talk-ht mailing list
Talk-ht@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ht