Re: [OSM-talk-ie] mapping roads

2014-03-15 Thread Daniel Cussen
It would be useful if we got a firm no, before we start re-inventing the wheel.
Personally I would not need an app. There are loads of OSM apps that
allow editing on the go. It would be useful to track the number of
zones entered to see if we are missing any.

On 14/03/2014, Donie Kelly donie.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
 Would it be useful if I released an app that allowed you to mark the
 beginning and end of the zones? I could also gather the speed limit if you
 drive it at close to the limits?

 Could we get the community to help out?

 I'm thinking of releasing it for free.  A paid option gets you live camera
 reports.

 I love to get your help so I can do this without risk of breaching
 copyrights.

 Donie

 On 14 Mar 2014, at 19:50, Daniel Cussen d...@post.com wrote:

 I've just got a response from An Garda that my request has been passed up
 the chain.
 Fingers crossed.
 Donie

 Donie Did you ever get an official response from the Gardai regarding
 your request to use the data from Gardai.ie speedzones?

 I am very interested in putting in this data too. If we get the
 official NO then we can begin mapping them ourselves and proactively
 seeking them out and marking them. I travel on national routes
 countrywide quite often so I could start getting the GPS positions of
 the signs on each side of the road, if we cannot use the Gardai info.

 So the first thing should be to get an official respose, and if it is
 yes then it should be easy to map the zones

 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement


 On 14/03/2014, Donie Kelly donie.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
 Can we add the restricted speed zones? The ones the go safe cameras are
 on?
 Just the speed limits on those stretches?

 I'm working on an app for the speed zones and I'd like to be able to pop
 up
 the speed limits as they are not always signed.

 I can statically scan for updates to release to the app when updates on
 the
 roads are implemented.

 Any objections on using the data for this?

 Donie

 On 14 Mar 2014, at 18:27, da fo43 daf...@outlook.com wrote:

 Hello All, First
 time posting on the mailing list but I've spoken individually to a
 number of you already. There can't be too many roads still to map in
 Ireland now so I guess the next step would be to improve the quality by
 filling in road numbers, names, etc. So I'm going to propose a few
 standards and see what people think. 1.   Map L roads 1000 to 4999
 (Local Primary) as 'Tertiary' and all other public roads as
 'Unclassified'
 or 'Residential'.
 I know people have a lot of differing views on this and will admit that
 some local primary roads seem to have less importance than Local
 Secondary and Local Tertiary roads but really I think it's better to go
 with what is designated rather than making judgement calls. On some
 parts of the map all roads are being set to 'Tertiary' so really I
 don't
 think the current system works. All other roads are mapped as per
 designation so I personally don't see why this should be any different.
 2.   Labeling roads L1000- with spaces.
 I see on some parts of the map that roads are being labelled with a
 space 'L 1234' instead of 'L1234'. I would be in favour of sticking to
 one standard, and going with the majority in not using a space.
 3.   Labeling roads over L.
 I propose the labeling roads listed as L12341 as L1234-1 as
 this makes it easier to read and work out which branch of
 primary/secondary road it belongs to. I guess this might not suit
 everyone.

 4.   Non public roads to be displayed as 'Service' or 'Track' only.
 It's not always obvious if some roads are private (especially some
 housing estates) but where it is known for certain they are private
 then
 I would be in favour of using a 'service' road rather than
 'residential' or 'unclassified'.

 Hopefully
 we can agree on some things and apologies if I have overwritten
 anyone's work recently, it's certainly not my intention to do so and I
 will go with whatever the consensus is. Lastly I was planning on making
 some small updates to the Wiki page, just a general cleanup on removing
 dead links and adding a sat nav section, if anyone has any objections
 please let me know.

 David

 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] mapping roads

2014-03-15 Thread Andrew McCarthy
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:06:30PM +, Donie Kelly wrote:
 I got nothing back. Didn't follow it up. 

The Garda website says it complies with the Regulations on the Re-Use
of Public Sector Information:
http://www.garda.ie/Controller.aspx?Page=1442Lang=1

You might have better luck contacting the people at http://psi.gov.ie/,
they might be able to clarify about reusing information in OSM.

Cheers,

Andrew

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] mapping roads

2014-03-15 Thread Donie Kelly
I’ve followed up with both now. 
Thanks for the links. I had let it slide but I’d really like to get this app 
moving again… I need it myself.

Anybody interested in helping me get these mapped ourselves? If we gather the 
data ourselves we are under no obligation to anybody?

I’ve set up a few routes with the enforcement on them and I need you guys to 
check them. You can use the following query at 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/index.html and it will highlight the roads with speed 
limits and enforcement on them. There are two on the ennis road leaving 
limerick and one outside Banagher in Offaly. Can you guys check they are done 
ok?

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?q=PCEtLQpUaGlzIMSHIGFuIGV4YW1wbGUgT3ZlcnBhc8SIcXXEmXkuxIRyecSJdCBvdcSoYsSmcHJlxJ1pbmcgdGjElVJ1xI1ixKt0b8SNYWJvxJghClnEqiBjxIwgZsSzZCBtb8SwxI7EkMSSxJTEiHdpxLfEtsS4IExvYcWQxL9vbMSjxII-CjzEu2nFgMWpCTzEn8ShxLZ5cGU9IndheSLFqSAJxbBoxJwta3Yga8W4ZW5mxZNjZW3GinQiIHbFuG1heHPFtmVkIi_Fr8WwYsWDeC3FssSlIHt7xqJveH19xp8KxbAvxqZ5xak8L8Wsxa4KxarEr8SzxKjFkmTFtyLFg2TFvMawPMSwY3Vyc8SVdMW1x4Jkb3duxp7Gtsa9bsa_b8eBxbhza2XElMS_x5XGnwc=BGGE0A8XKNR

I can build this query into the back end of the app and turn it into a form the 
app can use. It will be delivered to the app as regular updates automatically 
so updates to the OSM will make it into the app every day or week or whatever 
the update interval is.

I’d rather use the OSM as a data source that is dynamic so that if new zones 
appear in future we can get them into the app with no delay or intervention by 
me. 

I’m using parse.com as the backend if anybody wants to give me a hand… :)

Donie

On 15 Mar 2014, at 22:31, Andrew McCarthy m...@andrewmccarthy.ie wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:06:30PM +, Donie Kelly wrote:
 I got nothing back. Didn't follow it up. 
 
 The Garda website says it complies with the Regulations on the Re-Use
 of Public Sector Information:
   http://www.garda.ie/Controller.aspx?Page=1442Lang=1
 
 You might have better luck contacting the people at http://psi.gov.ie/,
 they might be able to clarify about reusing information in OSM.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Andrew
 
 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] mapping roads

2014-03-15 Thread Ken Guest
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:27 PM, da fo43 daf...@outlook.com wrote:

 Hello All, First
  time posting on the mailing list but I've spoken individually to a
 number of you already. There can't be too many roads still to map in
 Ireland now so I guess the next step would be to improve the quality by
 filling in road numbers, names, etc. So I'm going to propose a few
 standards and see what people think. 1.   Map L roads 1000 to 4999
 (Local Primary) as 'Tertiary' and all other public roads as 'Unclassified'
 or 'Residential'.


Changing the tagging of roads based on an arbitrary reason such as an
assigned L ref value where we presume there is a consistent scheme applied
to it is mindless. Not all [county] councils assigned values based on the
quality of the road, I know of at least one where the assigned value is
based on the electoral division that the road is in.

Changing the tagging of anything based on the self-perceived notion that
you know better where in actual fact you might not, is little more than
mindless vandalism. Good intentions or not. This is why I hope you are
looking for advice first, here and now, before you change anything based on
your gut feel.


  I know people have a lot of differing views on this and will admit that
  some local primary roads seem to have less importance than Local
 Secondary and Local Tertiary roads but really I think it's better to go
 with what is designated rather than making judgement calls. On some
 parts of the map all roads are being set to 'Tertiary' so really I don't
  think the current system works. All other roads are mapped as per
 designation so I personally don't see why this should be any different.



Tag a road as how it is - if a road is primarily residential then tag it as
residential. If a road, no matter what the classification is according to
how you interpret an L-ref number, is only good enough for being
unclassified rather than, say tertiary, then tag it as that. If some
remnant of the old N7 is now little more than a cul-de-sac with a few
houses on it, tag it as such, not highway=primary :-)

Take a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway to see what I
mean, and remember:

  If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and smell's like a duck
then it's a duck.



  2.   Labeling roads L1000- with spaces.
  I see on some parts of the map that roads are being labelled with a
 space 'L 1234' instead of 'L1234'. I would be in favour of sticking to
 one standard, and going with the majority in not using a space.


Not having spaces is good, but please don't readjust the formatting
otherwise! Read on...


  3.   Labeling roads over L.
  I propose the labeling roads listed as L12341 as L1234-1 as
 this makes it easier to read and work out which branch of
 primary/secondary road it belongs to. I guess this might not suit
 everyone.


Ground Truth requires that you map it as you see it, not as how you wish
you saw it.
Please don't remove hyphens from where you think they don't belong and add
them to where you want them. There are enough standards without making up
more - or I suppose you could say people get confused easily enough without
adding reformatting into the mix.



 4.   Non public roads to be displayed as 'Service' or 'Track' only.
  It's not always obvious if some roads are private (especially some
 housing estates) but where it is known for certain they are private then
  I would be in favour of using a 'service' road rather than
 'residential' or 'unclassified'.



If the main use of a road is residential (e.g. down a cul-de-sac or in a
housing estate), then tag it as residential. Tracks are roads for
agricultural or forestry use. Private residential roads should be tagged
highway=residential;access=private not as highway=service which means
something completely different (and used to tag things such as alleys,
parking aisles and the likes).

Remember my duck sentence? :-)


Ken



-- 
http://about.me/kenguest/
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie