Good point, something I hadn't considered
On 10 Aug 2015 15:37, "Rory McCann" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/08/15 00:13, Dave Corley wrote:
> > - In terms of representation, when it comes to looking for data
> > from govt. bodies, again I would keep it simple. For formal (in
> > person, snail mail) representations, if the body is based in NI, it
> > falls to OSM Ireland, if the body is based elsewhere it falls to
> > OSM UK.
>
> I don't know about this. I'd suggest allowing either group to be able
> to make formal representations. Who knows, maybe some governmental
> body might be more receptive to something from one group or the other?
> Both groups can and should discuss together before making any formal
> requests. We both want the same thing, and it would suck if we tied
> ourselves down to one method that will bite us later. Why not keep our
> options open?
>
> Rory
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVyLb7AAoJEOrWdmeZivv27IMH+gKyx0pdP2GY/g13bqcn5dgQ
> eNUbmVt8/ggVhfn0Wy1VuMIUkM0RyRGdJlhEdMoGw5PtRnFsLeM44hDFfTJ/u1DO
> B8d19bbgzEvjkMtBmhqeaEn4KScOwCXyWhv2u0OS/AVApYr1EXotN0vSLqOvsDPw
> NRWTFTln3k1u//Po9v9T2S/ucwOTVmo0UaL8GO3Mwfe5K3pcFdBiTsseFNOzzcRV
> 0gGFCF+G5Ftmtoa0hq9d/yIpbbHiayKpJKk1iaA3TDK3QPhlGi6g2VKvZqUVLJjN
> 2sWWa9d/zhw041m+0tGdSDhPuYEuK4y5i4DN5Df+iwGizh/+kHP3IufELgqcKYI=
> =xcpq
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> ___
> Talk-ie mailing list
> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
