Re: [Talk-it] R: non trovo piu di un comune su OSMAND neanche con la mappe aggiornate

2013-09-20 Per discussione Giacomo Boschi
Il giorno 20 settembre 2013 02:36, yahoo-pier_andreit  ha scritto:

> ho aggiornato la mappa italy e lazio-italy versioni del 11/09/13 e
> 13/09/13, ma mancano almeno i comuni di Castelforte Santi Cosma e Damiano
> Minturno, come posso aggiornare le mappe?? dove posso trovare il
> database e aggiornarlo???
>

I comuni ci sono. Purtroppo osmand ha un comportamento poco intuitivo:
durante la digitazione mostra solo i comuni indicati come city e town, ma
non i village. Per vedere i village bisogna premere il pulsante "Ricerca
comuni/codice postale". L'ho scoperto solo da poco.

-- 
Giacomo Boschi
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


Re: [Talk-it] OSMF local chapters

2013-09-20 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Penso che saresti stato di aiuto, visto che hai esperienze di come vanno le
cose in Wikimedia. Si continua con la bozza del statuto di associazione e
fra 2 settimane (circa) ci sarà una nuova riunione, forse anche tramite
altri canali (mailing-list, irc, etc.).

ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


Re: [Talk-it] OSMF local chapters

2013-09-20 Per discussione Maurizio Napolitano
Se non erro ha partecipato Simone

--
Maurizio 'napo' Napolitano
http://de.straba.us
Il giorno 20/set/2013 19:01, "Cristian Consonni" 
ha scritto:

> Il 20 settembre 2013 15:17, Martin Koppenhoefer
>  ha scritto:
> > Oggi alle 16:00 (CET) / 14:00 (UTC) ci sarà una conferenza telefonica per
> > parlare dei "local chapters". Qualcuno di voi ci sarà?
>
> Peccato, mi sarebbe interessata.
>
> C
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


[Talk-it] R: Re: R: Re: R: non trovo piu di un comune su OSMAND neanche con la mappe aggiornate

2013-09-20 Per discussione beppebo...@libero.it
prova a far così disinstalla osmand

scarica l'ultima versione e installala

scarica il file italy no lazio

e poi esegui la ricerca

se ci sono nelle mappe nel file italy c'è tutto in quelli regionali a volte ci 
sono dei dati mancanti e non so il perchè

ciao

se i problemi persistono proprio non saprei



>Messaggio originale
>Da: pier_andr...@yahoo.it
>Data: 20/09/2013 13.45
>A: 
>Ogg: Re: [Talk-it] R: Re: R: non trovo piu di un comune su OSMAND neanche con 
la mappe aggiornate
>
>On 09/20/2013 08:06 AM, beppebo...@libero.it wrote:
>> probabilmente i nomi non sono inseriti, inseriscili in osm
>>
>
>come faccio a inserirli in OSM???
>in osm www.openstreetmap., riesco a trovare i comuni che in osmand 
>non trovo, percio' che intendi inseriscili in osm??
>
>> se scarichi i due file fanno conflitto, installa solo il file italy e poi 
a
>> questo punto installa le mappe del 21/9
>>
>> ciao
>>
>
>non e' che osmand mi fa scegliere che mappe installare, lui al massimo 
>aggiorna a quelle disponibili piu recenti, e sono quelle che ho 
>installato, come faccio a scaricare e installare le mappe che dici tu??
>
>grazie ciao :-) :-) pier
>
>___
>Talk-it mailing list
>Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>



___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


Re: [Talk-it] OSMF local chapters

2013-09-20 Per discussione Cristian Consonni
Il 20 settembre 2013 15:17, Martin Koppenhoefer
 ha scritto:
> Oggi alle 16:00 (CET) / 14:00 (UTC) ci sarà una conferenza telefonica per
> parlare dei "local chapters". Qualcuno di voi ci sarà?

Peccato, mi sarebbe interessata.

C

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


[Talk-it] OSMF local chapters

2013-09-20 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Oggi alle 16:00 (CET) / 14:00 (UTC) ci sarà una conferenza telefonica per
parlare dei "local chapters". Qualcuno di voi ci sarà?

ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


Re: [Talk-it] Embed di una mappa OSM con immagini sa satellite/aeree

2013-09-20 Per discussione Maurizio Napolitano
> Nella risposta che mi ha dato il Presidente del BGLUG[5] mi chiedeva
> se c'era modo di avere anche la visualizzazione "satellite" ed i
> parcheggi.

stavo per risponderti di usare il WMS della regione lombardia
usando leaflet
http://leafletjs.com/reference.html

ma ho visto che mentre qui
http://www.cartografia.regione.lombardia.it/viewer25/index.jsp?parameters={%27srsWkid%27:32632,%27serviceLMOperator%27:%27exclude%27,%27widgetVisible%27:%27Gestisci%20contenuto%27,%27servicesLM%27:[{%27wkid%27:32632,%27queryAndZoom%27:null,%27servicename%27:%27%27,%27servicehost%27:%27http://www.cartografia.regione.lombardia.it/ArcGIS10/services/wms/ortofoto2012_wms/MapServer/WMSServer%27,%27type%27:%27OGC:WMS%27,%27label%27:%27Ortofoto%20AGEA%202012%20%28Web%20Map%20Server%29%27,%27layerDefinitions%27:[],%27visible%27:%27true%27,%27url%27:%27http://www.cartografia.regione.lombardia.it/ArcGIS10/services/wms/ortofoto2012_wms/MapServer/WMSServer%27,%27docuuid%27:%27{B11D8EA2-CF15-B780-5F33-CE0E91E8F45E}%27,%27layerId%27:0,%27alpha%27:0.7}],%27serviceBMVisible%27:%27%27}
ti appare
... se fai la richiesta normale ... ti manda a quel paese

curiosamente pero' le tile sono pubbliche
es.
http://www.cartografia.regione.lombardia.it/ArcGIS10P/rest/services/BaseMap/ortofoto2012UTM32N/MapServer/tile/13/72818/83865

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


Re: [Talk-it] Embed di una mappa OSM con immagini sa satellite/aeree

2013-09-20 Per discussione Carlo Stemberger

Il 19/09/2013 15:43, sabas88 ha scritto:
Fare una estrazione con overpass-api e mostrare il layer geojson? 
http://leafletjs.com/examples/geojson.html


Si, se non erro CoinMap ad esempio usa proprio questo approccio: 
https://github.com/prusnak/coinmap


Carlo

--
 .'  `.   | Registered Linux User #443882
 |a_a  |  | http://counter.li.org/  .''`.
 \<_)__/  +--- : :'  :
 /(   )\  ---+ `. `'`
|\`>  <  /\  Registered Debian User #9 |   `-
\_|=='|_/   http://debiancounter.altervista.org/ |


___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


Re: [Talk-it] R: Re: R: non trovo piu di un comune su OSMAND neanche con la mappe aggiornate

2013-09-20 Per discussione yahoo-pier_andreit

On 09/20/2013 08:06 AM, beppebo...@libero.it wrote:

probabilmente i nomi non sono inseriti, inseriscili in osm



come faccio a inserirli in OSM???
in osm www.openstreetmap., riesco a trovare i comuni che in osmand 
non trovo, percio' che intendi inseriscili in osm??



se scarichi i due file fanno conflitto, installa solo il file italy e poi a
questo punto installa le mappe del 21/9

ciao



non e' che osmand mi fa scegliere che mappe installare, lui al massimo 
aggiorna a quelle disponibili piu recenti, e sono quelle che ho 
installato, come faccio a scaricare e installare le mappe che dici tu??


grazie ciao :-) :-) pier

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


[Talk-it] Fwd: [Imports] Introducing OSMLY

2013-09-20 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Segnalo questo nuovo tool per organizzare/eseguire gli imports:


-- Forwarded message --
From: Aaron Lidman 
Date: 2013/9/20
Subject: [Imports] Introducing OSMLY
To: talk...@openstreetmap.org, impo...@openstreetmap.org


 The following post is best viewed at http://osmly.com full text is posted
below for posterity.







OSMLY is a simple browser based importer for OpenStreetMap. It makes
importing easy by presenting each feature one at a time, allowing users to
manually review the item, make any needed adjustments to positions or tags,
and upload directly to OSM. It also allows for reporting problems that
other users can look over and a quality assurance mode where administrative
users can confirm everything that has been uploaded. The aim is to make
simple imports easier, more cooperative, and less error prone.


http://osmly.com/screenshots/example.jpg


Try the demo: http://osmly.com/la-parks.html


OSMLY was born out of a frustration with the way imports are organized. I
was preparing some imports for Los Angeles County, reading up on past
imports and organized things according to how I see they are being done
today (wiki, spreadsheets, many .osm files, JOSM). I wasn't into it. The
organization and tools involved seems too complicated and clunky for
getting more than a small number of people involved.


Even with very simple data we would have to deal with many .osm files each
containing many features themselves, a central spreadsheet for tracking who
is doing what and the status of each group of items, and everyone would
have to use JOSM. Then editing involves managing multiple layers in JOSM,
downloading the area around each feature, looking around and resolving any
conflicts, uploading in a small batch, and making sure to tag changesets
correctly. Ideally, someone would then go back, search for the changesets
and confirm everything was done correctly.


http://osmly.com/screenshots/overview.jpg


That's too complicated for my liking and the pool of users who know how to
do all this without making mistakes is too small. On the other hand, most
of that complexity is necessary for organizing the people involved and
maintaining some quality to the data going into OSM. I want a simpler and
more automated way of handling the most manual and repetitive parts for
really basic imports. I just want a simple way for someone with OSM
experience and knowledge but not necessarily a GIS data or programming
background to help out with basic tasks and share their knowledge to get
more data on the map.


http://osmly.com/screenshots/QA.jpg


I built OSMLY to reduce the complexity of doing simple imports with many
people and many features. It's just the essentials: editing geometry,
fixing tags, displaying relevant nearby features from OSM, flagging
problems and uploading to OSM. Features are served from a simple database
to keep track of everything/everyone and different actions are allowed
based on an feature's status. Once an item is submitted it's available for
Quality Assurance where other users can confirm everything was done
correctly and flagged results can get attention from more experienced users
in JOSM.


http://osmly.com/screenshots/geojson.png


Technically, OSMLY takes in GeoJSON data and makes sure geometry is valid,
simplifies, flags obviously difficult items, adds bounds for each item, and
converts everything to a sqlite database ready to be served up to the
world. A simple server takes care of routing requests from the browser to
database queries and returning results. Once the user has received a new
feature the surrounding area is download from an OSM server and those
results are filtered for relevant geometry. Then it's all displayed on the
map. From there it gets a bit more complex depending on the user's actions.


http://osmly.com/screenshots/basic.jpg


Some key features:

* Context - nearby relevant features that may conflict are shown
alongside the item being edited along with complete tags. Context filtering
can be set using regular OSM tags. http://osmly.com/screenshots/context.png

* Quality Assurance - administrative users, specified in the settings,
can review everything that has been submitted and confirm each item has
been done correctly

* Edit in JSOM - every item can be remotely opened and completed in
JOSM if you prefer. http://osmly.com/screenshots/inJOSM.png

* Tag Manipulation - depending on your data source, you might not have
to do any tag manipulation before OSMLY. Tag keys can be renamed, added,
and removed.

* User Whitelist - specify exactly which users are allowed on an import
or allow everyone (default)


Limitations:

Currently OSMLY only works with polygons. Eventually, time allowing, I'd
like to expand to other GeoJSON feature types (points and linestrings).
OSMLY is only ment for simple imports so there aren't plans for
implementing multipolygons or anything else too complex. Some of thi