Re: [Talk-in] Question regarding open-elevation map

[Arun Ganesh]

It should definitely be SRTM, there is no other open global DEM of that
quality.

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Deepthi Patric 
wrote:

> How does the elevation map work ? Does it work by extracting contours from
> SRTM ? Or does it use point-sampling tool ?
>
> Regards,
> Deepthi J
>
> ___
> Talk-in mailing list
> Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
>
>
___
Talk-in mailing list
Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in

Re: [Talk-it] alberi monumentali

[Giuseppe Cillis]

Per la questione età , da tecnico del settore, direi che sarebbe meglio
evitare di inserire formule di stima visto che spesso le formule sono da
contestualizzare.
Per cui, per riassumere, vorrei posizionare gli alberi relativi alla mia
regione (Basilicata)... come mi muovo ? Utilizzo questi tag?
node: 40.539028, 16.328194
ele=500
natural=tree
species= Quercus pubescens Willd.
species:it=Roverella
circumference=495
start_date=1819|1726|1621 (singolo|filare|bosco)
height=24
denotation=natural_monument
ref:mipaaf=01/H687/MT/17
changeset
source = Ministero delle Politiche Agricole - MIPAAF

Il giorno 30 maggio 2018 20:38, Martin Koppenhoefer 
ha scritto:

>
>
> 2018-05-30 14:53 GMT+02:00 Cascafico Giovanni :
>
>> Il giorno 30 maggio 2018 12:21, Martin Koppenhoefer <
>> dieterdre...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>>> ref:mipaaf ci è utile? Come nome del tag va bene.
>>>
>>> Potrebbe essere utile se un giorno redessero disponibili le schede
>> specifiche dell'albero.
>>
>
>
> si, conosco questa idea, ma nella realtà non è mai successo che un id
> importato in OSM è stato utile. ;-)
> Per me si può anche importare, solo che non ci credo ;-)
>
>
>
>>
>> Ho aggiunto la start_date, stimata  secondo dei criteri approssimativi di
>> crescita della circonferenza che dipendono fortemente dalla posizione
>> relativa ad altri alberi (competizione). Anche se il form del ministero
>> richiedeva di specificare albero singolo, in filare, in bosco, nel dataset
>> non mi pare ci sia questo campo, per cui un eventuale import dovrebbe
>> tenerne conto (avessimo un landuse nazionale!); intanto ho riportato le tre
>> stime, per esempio
>> start_date=1885|1823|1753 (singolo|filare|bosco)
>>
>
>
> forse in rari casi il start_date è conosciuto (per esempio perché c'era
> una cerimonia per la piantumazione).
>
> Ciao,
> Martin
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[OSM-talk] Remote Sensing / DOP / DIY people

[Florian Lohoff]

Hi,
is there a Mailinglist for the Technical aspects of DIY Remote Sensing
e.g. Aerial imaging? 

I am talking about Drone/Copter/Autonomous flying like Sensefly Ebee 
and the like.

As a lot of people are not capable of buying of the shelve equipment
like the Ebee it might be interesting to get people together with
their DIY projects. Autonomous Fixed Wings could be build in the range
of 300€ - But then IMHO the hard part starts.

Camera, Georeferencing the GeoTIFFs, creating a WMS service to be
able to use them with Josm etc. Getting together an Open Source
toolchain, docker containers, howtos etc 


Here is a (German) walk through in building a FPV Wing. We wouldnt need
the FPV parts and this size is most likely not capable of carrying a
camera but its a start.

https://blog.seidel-philipp.de/fpv-wing-aus-kopter-teilen-bauen-mit-inav/


For somebody who has dealt with electronics in the past its Buildable
but i am having a hard time getting it actually to fly.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
 UTF-8 Test: The  ran after a , but the  ran away


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-cz] Data ze ZÚ

[Honza Cibulka]

Otevřeli to omylem, už je to zablokovaný ;)

Jan Cibulka
 
tel. 776 307 158
http://datastory.cz

> On 31 May 2018, at 09:45, Vladimír Semotán  wrote:
> 
> Zdravím, 
> nemáte někdo prosím aktuální informace, jestli to už jde stahovat, nebo ne? 
> Snažím se hledat, zkouším veřejný služby na geoportálu ČÚZK (podle 
> https://datastory.cz/2017_02_15_%C4%8C%C3%9AZK%20otev%C5%99el%20data%20v%C4%8Detn%C4%9B%20ZABAGEDu.html),
>  ale moc moudrý z toho nejsem. Nedaří nic stáhnout (nejsem v GISech moc 
> kovaný). 
> 
> Díky, 
> V.
> 
> Dne 26. dubna 2018 1:34 Jan Macura  napsal(a):
>> Ahoj,
>> 
>> 2018-04-23 16:23 GMT+02:00 Lukas Gebauer :
>>> > Výškopis pro OSM vůbec přínosný není, protože OSM
>>> > (téměř) data o výšce nesbírá.
>>> 
>>> Opět s tebou nemohu souhlasit. Pro ČR existuje tak podrobný výškopis 
>>> z laserového měření, že se podle toho dá zmapovat kdejaký sráz, val, 
>>> úvoz, atd. A to pro OSM přínos je, protože to z ortomapy fakt 
>>> nevyčteš.
>> 
>> Ano, to máš pravdu. A nevyčteš totéž, snadněji, ze ZM 10, resp. SM5V? Asi ne 
>> ve stejný podrobnosti, ale pro OSM asi více než dostatečně.
>> Nicméně je fakt, že pro přesnou polohu lesních cest jsou data z laserscanu 
>> přesnější, než ortofoto (o družicových snímcích nemluvě). Beru.
>> 
>> H.
>> 
>> ___
>> Talk-cz mailing list
>> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>> https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
>> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
> https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020i and Wikidata

[Jonathan Brown]

Has anyone thought of using Wikidata to enhance the BC2020i project work with 
secondary and postsecondary students?  
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page

How could structured, linked open data help municipalities and regions engage 
students in collaborative research projects? We are exploring ways to build on 
the Durham Mapathon event of May 3. At that event, Durham Region staff 
collaborated with senior secondary school teachers and students from Clarington 
Municipality on policy challenges. The Durham Region GIS staff provided the 
technical support. 

Jonathan 

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-cz] Data ze ZÚ

[Marián Kyral]

Ahoj,

a co přesně chceš stáhnout a v jakém formátu? Vrstvy jsou přístupné přes WFS
a něco přes WMS.





http://geoportal.cuzk.cz/(S(khzqw4qeybzadiuamv5le5kn))/Default.aspx?mode=
TextMeta=sit.stah.uvod=sit.stah_tab=sekce-03-gp=33




http://geoportal.cuzk.cz/(S(khzqw4qeybzadiuamv5le5kn))/Default.aspx?mode=
TextMeta=WMS.uvod=WMS.uvod_tab=sekce-03-gp=31





To co s těmi daty všechno můžeš dělat už je jiná písnička.




Marián





-- Původní e-mail --
Od: Vladimír Semotán 
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic 
Datum: 31. 5. 2018 15:49:38
Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Data ze ZÚ
"

Zdravím,


nemáte někdo prosím aktuální informace, jestli to už jde stahovat, nebo ne?
Snažím se hledat, zkouším veřejný služby na geoportálu ČÚZK (podle https://
datastory.cz/2017_02_15_%C4%8C%C3%9AZK%20otev%C5%99el%20data%20v%C4%8Detn%C
4%9B%20ZABAGEDu.html
(https://datastory.cz/2017_02_15_%C4%8C%C3%9AZK%20otev%C5%99el%20data%20v%C4%8Detn%C4%9B%20ZABAGEDu.html)
), ale moc moudrý z toho nejsem. Nedaří nic stáhnout (nejsem v GISech moc
kovaný).





Díky,


V.





Dne 26. dubna 2018 1:34 Jan Macura mailto:macura...@gmail.com)> napsal(a):
"
Ahoj,




2018-04-23 16:23 GMT+02:00 Lukas Gebauer mailto:gebyl...@mlp.cz)>:
"> Výškopis pro OSM vůbec přínosný není, protože OSM
> (téměř) data o výšce nesbírá.

Opět s tebou nemohu souhlasit. Pro ČR existuje tak podrobný výškopis
z laserového měření, že se podle toho dá zmapovat kdejaký sráz, val,
úvoz, atd. A to pro OSM přínos je, protože to z ortomapy fakt
nevyčteš."



Ano, to máš pravdu. A nevyčteš totéž, snadněji, ze ZM 10, resp. SM5V? Asi ne
ve stejný podrobnosti, ale pro OSM asi více než dostatečně.


Nicméně je fakt, že pro přesnou polohu lesních cest jsou data z laserscanu
přesnější, než ortofoto (o družicových snímcích nemluvě). Beru.



H.






___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org(mailto:Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
(https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz)
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz(https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz)

"


___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
"___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [Talk-cz] api.osm.cz

[Marián Kyral]

No api.osm.cz fakt nefunguje. A asi ani nikdy nebude. Zkus https://api.
openstreetmap.cz/ - to mi funguje.




Marián







-- Původní e-mail --
Od: Tom Ka 
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic 
Datum: 31. 5. 2018 14:17:46
Předmět: [Talk-cz] api.osm.cz
"Ahoj, jen info, api.osm.cz je od dnesniho rana (04:01) nedostupne.
Snad s tim Michal Grezl brzo neco udela.

Bye

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
"___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

[Talk-in] Question regarding open-elevation map

[Deepthi Patric]

How does the elevation map work ? Does it work by extracting contours from
SRTM ? Or does it use point-sampling tool ?

Regards,
Deepthi J
___
Talk-in mailing list
Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in

Re: [Talk-GB] Council Footpath data

[Chris Hill]

Robert,

thanks for chasing the East Riding of Yorkshire council to receive their 
rights of way data licenced as OGL. I failed to get this but your 
tenacity, knowledge and skilful wording made the difference. Thanks again.


Chris


On 30/05/2018 22:47, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:

On 30 May 2018 at 11:37, Adam Snape  wrote:

Over the coming months I'm hoping to individually clarify licensing with all
of the authorities which haven't explicitly, unambiguously and publicly
licensed their RoW data under OGL3 (and, yes, I know that's most of them).
I'll also try and get new or updated data where not currently available or
several years old.

That sounds great. Some time ago I was planning to do something
similar, but have been side-tracked by other projects and have never
found the time. This is as far as I got:
http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/open-data


In the slightly longer term I think our aim needs to be to persuade all
authorities to proactively publish new versions of their data as open data,
rather than individuals having to individually badger authorities to update
their data. Under their Publication Schemes they should start doing this
automatically once information is supplied the first time, but it seems that
only a minority of authorities who have released data currently publish it
proactively.

Indeed. Also, the Environmental Information Regulations (which PRoW
GIS data probably fall under, rather than FOI, though FOI Publication
Schemes still apply) also includes provision for councils to
proactively digitise and publish environmental data they hold --
whether requested or not-- but they don't seem to be making much
progress with this...

Anyway, Adam, I've just sent you a longer private message with some
more thoughts you might be interested in.

Robert.



--
cheers
Chris Hill (chillly)


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Council Footpath data

[Nick Whitelegg]

(Adam - apologies for not quoting, but this email client performs the annoying 
habit of top-posting and haven't figured out a way to get it to do standard 
quotes).


So, just to clarify, taking my local authority (Hampshire) as an example, does 
this page _definitely_ confirm that their RoW data is available under OGL?


https://www.hants.gov.uk/aboutthecouncil/informationandstats/opendata/opendatasearch/publicrightsofway

Reason being that I'm now in a position where I may be able to do something 
with this data and I'd like to use Hampshire as it's my local county.

Thanks,

Nick



From: Adam Snape 
Sent: 30 May 2018 11:37:47
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists); talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Council Footpath data

Hi,

Just a word of warning to double check the licensing terms before use. Many 
councils' licensing is ambiguous in that they'll refer to the OGL then state or 
link to the incompatible OS Open Data attribution terms.

Whilst it's a wonderful resource and I think Barry has done a great job, the 
rowmaps site doesn't help with licensing clarity. There are quite a few 
references to unverifiable private email communications where the licence terms 
differ from the publicly available terms. Any mention of the OGL is taken at 
face value even if when checked the licence is actually the OS modified OGL ie. 
the incompatible OS Open Data licence! Perhaps most seriously, rowmaps also 
relies on a misinterpretation of communication with OS to suggest that OS Open 
Data licensed material is now automatically OGL3 licenced material.

All of this matters very little to most users of rowmaps but for OSM purposes 
as we require ODBL compatibility we need greater clarity.

Over the coming months I'm hoping to individually clarify licensing with all of 
the authorities which haven't explicitly, unambiguously and publicly licensed 
their RoW data under OGL3 (and, yes, I know that's most of them). I'll also try 
and get new or updated data where not currently available or several years old. 
Ideally I'll get the authorities to include a clear unambiguous licence on 
their websites but, failing that, I'll publish the relevant communication 
online so that it is verifiable and we do at least have certainty about the 
data currently available to us.

In the slightly longer term I think our aim needs to be to persuade all 
authorities to proactively publish new versions of their data as open data, 
rather than individuals having to individually badger authorities to update 
their data. Under their Publication Schemes they should start doing this 
automatically once information is supplied the first time, but it seems that 
only a minority of authorities who have released data currently publish it 
proactively.

Kind regards,

Adam


On 27 May 2018 at 11:21, Nick Whitelegg 
mailto:nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk>> wrote:


Thanks for that - looks like a few councils are OGL which means we should 
theoretically be able to add designation tags from the council data.


Agree about not copying the data verbatim from council data - am more 
interested in giving people a way to easily identify council paths unmapped on 
OSM.


Nick





___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 409

[Tom Ka]

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 409 týdeníku WeeklyOSM:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/10371

* Kůrovec a KČT.
* Dobíjecí stanice.
* Kopie Strava pro SK.
* Sezónní vodní toky.
* Ekonomika z OSM dat.
* Ebola v Kongu.
* Farmářské obchody.
* Novinky Overpass API.
* Výběr geokodéru.

Pěkné počtení ...

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [Talk-cz] Data ze ZÚ

[Vladimír Semotán]

Zdravím,
nemáte někdo prosím aktuální informace, jestli to už jde stahovat, nebo ne?
Snažím se hledat, zkouším veřejný služby na geoportálu ČÚZK (podle
https://datastory.cz/2017_02_15_%C4%8C%C3%9AZK%20otev%C5%99el%20data%20v%C4%8Detn%C4%9B%20ZABAGEDu.html),
ale moc moudrý z toho nejsem. Nedaří nic stáhnout (nejsem v GISech moc
kovaný).

Díky,
V.

Dne 26. dubna 2018 1:34 Jan Macura  napsal(a):

> Ahoj,
>
> 2018-04-23 16:23 GMT+02:00 Lukas Gebauer :
>
>> > Výškopis pro OSM vůbec přínosný není, protože OSM
>> > (téměř) data o výšce nesbírá.
>>
>> Opět s tebou nemohu souhlasit. Pro ČR existuje tak podrobný výškopis
>> z laserového měření, že se podle toho dá zmapovat kdejaký sráz, val,
>> úvoz, atd. A to pro OSM přínos je, protože to z ortomapy fakt
>> nevyčteš.
>
>
> Ano, to máš pravdu. A nevyčteš totéž, snadněji, ze ZM 10, resp. SM5V? Asi
> ne ve stejný podrobnosti, ale pro OSM asi více než dostatečně.
> Nicméně je fakt, že pro přesnou polohu lesních cest jsou data z laserscanu
> přesnější, než ortofoto (o družicových snímcích nemluvě). Beru.
>
> H.
>
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
> https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
>
>
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

[Talk-cz] api.osm.cz

[Tom Ka]

Ahoj, jen info, api.osm.cz je od dnesniho rana (04:01) nedostupne.
Snad s tim Michal Grezl brzo neco udela.

Bye

___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

[Simon Slater]

On Wednesday, 30 May 2018 6:10:54 PM AEST Jonathon Rossi wrote:
> use of mailing lists it is common people forget to reply all.

I use "Reply to List" - easy as pressing L.
-- 
Regards
Simon Slater

Registered Linux User #463789 @ http://linuxcounter.net

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] Perth Canning Rv wetland Relation: 8337801

[Warin]

Hi,

I have repaired Relation: 8337801  - wetland marsh that had been altered by an 
Apple person.

It was identified by OSMinspector as a probable error (and boy was it).

It is now closed and has no crossing members. So technically better. But I am 
far from local .. so it lacks verification.

If someone knows the area they should be able to do better than my poor 
attempts based on rough satellite views.

I also included more bits in the Relation: Canning River (8337802) - makes it 
easier on making the wetland relation.

Thanks for any local help there.


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au