Re: [OSM-talk] odbl
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 23:10:38 -, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: So basically you are saying that it is not possible to explain it in layman's terms. Thank you for your input. No, just that your more likely to get an answer about the legal side of things in legal-talk. -- Robert ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Gun Location Sensors
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:36:07 -, Jeffrey Martin dogs...@gmail.com wrote: I googled and found that the brand name is Secures. I also found this article with a picture. http://media.www.jhunewsletter.com/media/storage/paper932/news/2009/12/03/NewsFeatures/Gun-Detection.Sensors.Installed.Around.City-3845405.shtml This article says they may be disguised as vents or bird houses. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/fs000201.pdf A box like that could be anything! ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] NOVAM viewer
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:27:16 +0100, Brian Prangle bpran...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi everyone Shelter = yes/no I think is essential to leave in as a requirement as to whether a bus stop is completley surveyed or not. For two reasons: indication of a shelter is a representation of what's present on the ground and it's a pretty siginificant presence ( after all we tag and map smaller things like post boxes and park benches!); and it's also useful for bus passengers to know whether they're going to get wet or not when waiting for a bus ( for when we can eventually actually render this on maps) How about adding an option to set wheelchair=yes to mark the new higher kerbs that are suddenly appearing everywhere (at least round here anyway) http://www.flickr.com/photos/pobice/3925707792/ -- Robert ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] NOVAM viewer
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:58:15 +0100, Christoph Boehme christ...@b3e.net wrote: Robert Naylor wrote: How about adding an option to set wheelchair=yes to mark the new higher kerbs that are suddenly appearing everywhere (at least round here anyway) http://www.flickr.com/photos/pobice/3925707792/ I would prefer to call it something like barrierfree=yes as it is not only helpful for wheelchair users. Maybe just raised_kerb=yes or kerb=raised as I'm not sure if its just me but barrierfree doesn't really suggest wheelchair/buggy/what ever accessible. In fact it sounds more like tagging that there isn't a barrier=fence or something in between the bus and the bus stop. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] NOVAM viewer
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:58:09 +0100, Christoph Boehme christ...@b3e.net wrote: Robert Naylor wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:58:15 +0100, Christoph Boehme christ...@b3e.net wrote: Robert Naylor wrote: How about adding an option to set wheelchair=yes to mark the new higher kerbs that are suddenly appearing everywhere (at least round here anyway) http://www.flickr.com/photos/pobice/3925707792/ I would prefer to call it something like barrierfree=yes as it is not only helpful for wheelchair users. Maybe just raised_kerb=yes or kerb=raised as I'm not sure if its just me but barrierfree doesn't really suggest wheelchair/buggy/what ever accessible. kerb=raised is a good idea (which could be combined with kerb=lowered for pedestrian crossings) as the bus stop only becomes accessible (for wheelchair users) if it is served by a low-floor bus. I'll be switching to using kerb=raised now. Although I assume if they've altered the kerb that they buses serving the route would be low-floor buses. On second thoughts after hearing about a bus stop which got built on the wrong street - and maintained maybe not :) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] Revert changeset (was Fixing duplicate nodes/ways)
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 14:16 +0100, an Alice Kaerast wrote: Is there any way that changesets #1420511 and #1420511 can be reverted? I would imagine not given that work has continued since then. Alternatively, how can we remove all the duplicate nodes and ways over this large area? I feel absolutely terrible for not noticing this sooner, and am terribly sorry for the problems caused. Is there any way to remove the items in this changeset that haven't been updated since upload on mass? I've tried to fix the odd item, but there is a lot of duplicated data. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing duplicate nodes/ways
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:12:06 +0100, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, Alice Kaerast wrote: Is there any way that changesets #1420511 and #1420511 can be reverted? I'm trying my hand at it now. Both numbers given above are the same, did you mean another changeset besides 1420511? Bye Frederik Its this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1420551 -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Potted plants vs. garden beds
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:35:24 +0100, Chris Hill chillly...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I don't think they are garden beds. This would usually bigger and usually at ground level and part of a garden. A potted plant tends to be a plant grown indoors in a pot also known as a house plant. The containers with plants in might be known as planters. I'm not sure the rows of planters with big spaces between really are a barrier. They could be described as a hedge, which is just a row of plants so barrier=hedge. How about barrier=bollard as they seem to perform the same function, they just look a bit better than your standard bollard. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] josm error message
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:27:16 +0100, Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote: Ulf Mehlig ulf.mehlig at gmx.net writes: Trying to upload some changes with JOSM, I receive the following error message: Cannot read numeric value from response before being asked to authenticate myself. Is this server-, data- or JOSM-related? Same error here. JOSM Revision: 1529. Nothing goes through. Same here. I've used wireshark to see what was going on and it was failing on authentication. (I haven't saved my username and password.) I entered my username and password in via preference's and tried again - it worked fine. -- Robert ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
