Re: [Talk-ko] boundaries

[Dongha Hwang]

+  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77488808#map=10/37.5566/125.1192
"ROK is possessing 12 nautical mile around Baengnyeong-do"
ᐧ

2019년 12월 20일 (금) 오후 9:31, Dongha Hwang 님이 작성:

> Sorry for the late response.
>
> User natureman did that edit, arguing "There is no island between
> Daecheong-do(대청도) and Yeonpyeong-do(연평도), so ROK doesn't possess the gap."
> However, Regarding my investigation, ROK argues that they must possess the
> area under 'Northern Limit Line'[2], but DPRK argues under 'Korea West Sea
> Maritime Military Demarcation line'[3].
>
> I think of this as an example of the disputed territory between two
> nations, but I've no idea about the situation...
>
> [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78538157
> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Limit_Line
> [3]
> https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%A1%B0%EC%84%A0_%EC%84%9C%ED%95%B4_%ED%95%B4%EC%83%81_%EA%B5%B0%EC%82%AC%EB%B6%84%EA%B3%84%EC%84%A0
> ᐧ
>
> 2019년 11월 27일 (수) 오후 9:12, 님이 작성:
>
>> Correction: The north WEST is looking strange.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> walter
>> --
>> My projects:
>>
>> Admin Boundaries of the World 
>> Missing Boundaries
>> 
>> Emergency Map 
>> Postal Code Map (Germany only) 
>> Fools (QA for zipcodes in Germany) 
>> Postcode Boundaries of Germany
>> 
>> OSM Software Watchlist
>> 
>> ___
>> Talk-ko mailing list
>> Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko
>>
>
___
Talk-ko mailing list
Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko

Re: [Talk-ko] boundaries

[Dongha Hwang]

Sorry for the late response.

User natureman did that edit, arguing "There is no island between
Daecheong-do(대청도) and Yeonpyeong-do(연평도), so ROK doesn't possess the gap."
However, Regarding my investigation, ROK argues that they must possess the
area under 'Northern Limit Line'[2], but DPRK argues under 'Korea West Sea
Maritime Military Demarcation line'[3].

I think of this as an example of the disputed territory between two
nations, but I've no idea about the situation...

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78538157
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Limit_Line
[3]
https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%A1%B0%EC%84%A0_%EC%84%9C%ED%95%B4_%ED%95%B4%EC%83%81_%EA%B5%B0%EC%82%AC%EB%B6%84%EA%B3%84%EC%84%A0
ᐧ

2019년 11월 27일 (수) 오후 9:12, 님이 작성:

> Correction: The north WEST is looking strange.
>
> Regards
>
> walter
> --
> My projects:
>
> Admin Boundaries of the World 
> Missing Boundaries
> 
> Emergency Map 
> Postal Code Map (Germany only) 
> Fools (QA for zipcodes in Germany) 
> Postcode Boundaries of Germany
> 
> OSM Software Watchlist
> 
> ___
> Talk-ko mailing list
> Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko
>
___
Talk-ko mailing list
Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko

[Talk-ko] boundaries

[wambacher]

Correction: The north WEST is looking strange.

Regards

walter

--
My projects:

Admin Boundaries of the World 
Missing Boundaries 


Emergency Map 
Postal Code Map (Germany only) 
Fools (QA for zipcodes in Germany) 
Postcode Boundaries of Germany 
OSM Software Watchlist 

___
Talk-ko mailing list
Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko

[Talk-ko] boundaries

[wambacher]

Hi,

the admin boundary of South Korea is looking strange. see 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/307756

especially the north east .

regards
walter, germany

--
My projects:

Admin Boundaries of the World 
Missing Boundaries 


Emergency Map 
Postal Code Map (Germany only) 
Fools (QA for zipcodes in Germany) 
Postcode Boundaries of Germany 
OSM Software Watchlist 

___
Talk-ko mailing list
Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko

[Talk-ko] Boundaries

[Robert Helvie]

I just wanted to say thanks to user "namuori" for adding in the province
boundaries for Korea. That is one thing that has been missing from Korea
for a while.

Also, I would like to make a suggestion/request. Now that we have
boundaries, please do not connect (join) the boundaries to any streets,
rivers, trails (any ways) in the OSM data. It is perfectly acceptable to
have the boundaries follow or parallel a way in OSM with separate nodes.

And in fact, if the boundary is kept separate from the other way data, it
makes working with OSM data much easier.
If more boundaries are added, it is better to not use existing ways (roads,
rivers, trails) as part of the relationship. Just add any additional ways
needed for any boundary relationships.
Keeping boundary data separate for now will help when new people start
editing (easier to understand).
And it makes easier to render and use OpenStreetMap on GPS and mobile
devices.

Thanks again to "namuori" and thanks to all the mappers in Korea. Things
are starting to look much better.

Remember don't copy from other maps or imagery (except Bing [when
adjusted]) and have fun!

Robert (alimamo)

*"We should give meaning to life, not wait for life to
give us meaning. "*
~ unknown
---
___
Talk-ko mailing list
Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko