Re: [talk-ph] Media Coverage

2009-01-19 Thread maning sambale
So it's here:
http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/?page=business6_jan20_2009

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:56 AM, maning sambale
 wrote:
> My take:
> On attracting more contributors:
> Yes! By all means.
>
> On vandalism:
> We all know OSM is a wiki.  So nobody can stop vandalism, in my
> experience most newbie mappers do not really vandalize, they're just
> making mistakes.  We all do at some point of our mapping.
>
> That being said, "with more eyeballs, all bugs are shallow".
> Currently there are no tools to effectively monitor perceived
> vandalism (intentional or not).  The future api should be able to
> address some of them:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6
>
>>> Agree I am sick of seeing on maps "MY house" or "randy's house" listed..
> I don't see a problem with this as long as we follow the addressing schema:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
>
> On moderating changes:
> I don't think any tool for approving/rejecting changes could work.
> Only more human eyes can work.  I use ito's osm mapper to monitor
> changes in my mapping area.  On thing I can say for prospective
> vandals.  Don't mess with my mapping area!  I will revert your edits
> right away.  In most cases, wala pa namang nag-ba-vandal :).  Any mode
> of policing might be futile.
>
> On mistakes by newbies:
> I usually contact them with a friendly message via the osm send
> message function.  If I see them making mistakes, I contact them
> directly and ask them to correct them.  I don't revert edits by other
> especially if it's not around my immediate mapping area.  I also use
> openstreetbugs to flag errors.
>
> OSM is a self-service project anybody can do whatever they want.
> Others may I ask then: So can I trust OSM data?  My take, can you
> trust government data in the Philippines:
> http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/comparing-philippine-road-data/
>
> Keep on mapping.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Jim Morgan  wrote:
>> ian lopez wrote, On Monday, January 19, 2009 10:12 AM:
>>> The media coverage may be good for the Pinoy OSM community, but I'm
>>> probably concerned that this would bring in "vandals". Hopefully, it
>>> wouldn't happen.
>>
>> You know the saying  there's no such thing as bad publicity.
>>
>> Well yes, I guess there is always a risk, but we can't have it both ways. We 
>> need more contributors, so we need more coverage. I think most people will 
>> just use the data to export maps in any case, but if they do that, then we 
>> also get exposure when people ask them where they got the map from. I think 
>> the actual mapping bit will only appeal to a certain kind of person.
>>
>> But this is an interesting point. What protection do we have against the 
>> deletion of information, accidental or otherwise? I remember when I started 
>> on OSM, a large area I'd worked on was deleted, but I think it was 
>> eventually restored from a backup. Can we roll back changes? Specifically, 
>> can we roll back changes made by a particular user? Are backups held at OSM 
>> central, or are we responsible for holding them ourselves.
>>
>> Its a tricky one to police. Should we have an identity check for people 
>> signing up? Verification by phone for example. Probably not, as its against 
>> the ethos of Open-ness.
>>
>> Should we have a moderator who needs to approve changes? This is how 
>> wikipedia copes with the problem. Maybe if we could  have moderator approval 
>> for changes over a certain number of nodes? Just thinking aloud here. I'm 
>> guessing none of this control is available within the OSM backend. But 
>> perhaps they could build it in if it is requested.
>>
>> Just for the record, I'm a professional paranoiac: I'm in IT security, so 
>> these are the sorts of questions I have to ask my clients every day.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> --
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] 0.6 move and downtime

2009-01-19 Thread maning sambale
Announcement from the main talk list.


-- Forwarded message --
From: SteveC 
Date: Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] 0.6 move and downtime
To: Talk Openstreetmap 


Dear all

We had a review call today on the technical side of OSM and one of the
things that came up was the transition to API 0.6

   http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6

API 0.6 is the latest and greatest in OSM APIs and brings scrummy
goodness like changesets. You can read more at the wiki page. A lot of
work has gone in to it from a number of people.

The downside is that there needs to be some database downtime while
the change happens. This means a period of time without login, editing
and so on. The slippy map will of course still work.

We have agreed a date of 21/22 March. During this time, and possibly
for a little while after, you won't be able to log in or edit while
things are upgraded.

Technical questions on this should be thrown at Matt Amos and TomH.

So, apologies, but hopefully this is enough advance warning for you to
avoid activities around that time. From there OSM will be stronger,
better, faster, longer and higher than before.

Best

Steve


___
talk mailing list
t...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph