Re: [talk-ph] tracing individual rice paddies

[Erwin Olario]

A bund is also defined as an embankment to control the flow of water. And
for reference, the English equivalent for the Tagalog term "pilapil" is
dyke or dike [0] or bund [1].

I am withdrawing my suggestion for the dyke tag, and second Maning's tag
man_made=bund as technically more appropriate in the context of Asian rice
fields and paddies. If this motion is carried, let's not forget to document
this somewhere [2][3].

[0] http://tl.w3dictionary.org/index.php?q=pilapil
[1] http://www.binisaya.com/node/21&search=root&word=pilapil
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbund
[3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions



*Erwin Olario*
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
» email: erwin@ *n**gnu**IT**y**.**net*
 | gov...@gmail.com
» mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013
» OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B


On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:18 PM, maning sambale  wrote:

> Yes, truly awesome work by the Lubao MPDC staff especially Pepe.  Just
> a bit of update from what I heard from Pepe and others.
> They were able to use the map in the preparation for Glenda.  Right
> now, they are asking each barangay captain to identify key features in
> the map like (amenities, shops, name of rivers, sitios, etc) which
> they now add in the map.
>
> Tasking manager job is still not finished [0], and they appreciate
> everybody's review especially with validating the task.  They are also
> having difficulty tagging some features (same as this original
> thread), I asked them to list them and send to this mailinglist so we
> can help them identify or create (if necessary) the best tag.
>
> Sorry for the digression, so what's the best tag now for paths along
> rice paddies? Should it be man_made=bund [1]? :)
>
> [0] http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/329
> [1] http://www.mozda.net/mozda6.html
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Erwin Olario  wrote:
> >
> > On a related note, should we encourage mapping of individual rice
> paddies,
> > similar to what's being done with fish ponds?
> >
> > Erwin Olario
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > » email: er...@ngnuity.net | gov...@gmail.com
> > » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013
> > » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93
> D56B
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Erwin Olario  wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> It's probably not being used as such but rice are flood crops and the
> wiki
> >> page for dyke states it as "an embankment built to *restrict the flow of
> >> water or other liquids*" , which in this applies to restricting the
> water
> >> within the paddies.
> >>
> >> Is there a more appropriate tag?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Erwin Olario
> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >> » email: er...@ngnuity.net | gov...@gmail.com
> >> » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013
> >> » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93
> >> D56B
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think neither tag is appropriate. man_made=dyke doesn't seem to be
> >>> appropriate since a dyke's purpose is to prevent flooding, and these
> rice
> >>> paddy embankments do not do that.
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 11, 2014 5:32 AM, "Erwin Olario"  wrote:
> 
> 
>  First of all, kudos to the volunteers working in the Lubao area[0] in
>  Pampanga for the level of details they are adding to OpenStreetMap.
> 
>  I do wonder, however, if the appropriate tags are being used. In this
>  case,  paddy field levees are being tagged as highway=path, when in
> fact
>  they are primarily used as embankments, not as paths.
> 
>  Many of us here in the mailing list would consider Lubao as a local
>  showcase for OpenStreetMap and perhaps, like me, would like it to
> show what
>  "Philippine Mapping Convention" is like in real life.
> 
>  I normally use the following tags for rice paddies:
>  landuse=farmland
>  crop=rice
>  farm=flooded_crops
> 
>  What are your thoughts about tagging ways between paddies as
>  man_made=dyke [1] over highway=path ?
> 
>  [0] http://osm.org/go/4zOPCCmZg-?m=
>  [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Ddyke
> 
> 
> 
>  Erwin Olario
>  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>  » email: er...@ngnuity.net | gov...@gmail.com
>  » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013
>  » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93
>  D56B
> 
>  ___
>  talk-ph mailing list
>  talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
> 
> >>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > talk-ph mailing list
> > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
> >
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ---

Re: [talk-ph] tracing individual rice paddies

[maning sambale]

Yes, truly awesome work by the Lubao MPDC staff especially Pepe.  Just
a bit of update from what I heard from Pepe and others.
They were able to use the map in the preparation for Glenda.  Right
now, they are asking each barangay captain to identify key features in
the map like (amenities, shops, name of rivers, sitios, etc) which
they now add in the map.

Tasking manager job is still not finished [0], and they appreciate
everybody's review especially with validating the task.  They are also
having difficulty tagging some features (same as this original
thread), I asked them to list them and send to this mailinglist so we
can help them identify or create (if necessary) the best tag.

Sorry for the digression, so what's the best tag now for paths along
rice paddies? Should it be man_made=bund [1]? :)

[0] http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/329
[1] http://www.mozda.net/mozda6.html


On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Erwin Olario  wrote:
>
> On a related note, should we encourage mapping of individual rice paddies,
> similar to what's being done with fish ponds?
>
> Erwin Olario
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> » email: er...@ngnuity.net | gov...@gmail.com
> » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013
> » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Erwin Olario  wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's probably not being used as such but rice are flood crops and the wiki
>> page for dyke states it as "an embankment built to *restrict the flow of
>> water or other liquids*" , which in this applies to restricting the water
>> within the paddies.
>>
>> Is there a more appropriate tag?
>>
>>
>>
>> Erwin Olario
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> » email: er...@ngnuity.net | gov...@gmail.com
>> » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013
>> » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93
>> D56B
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think neither tag is appropriate. man_made=dyke doesn't seem to be
>>> appropriate since a dyke's purpose is to prevent flooding, and these rice
>>> paddy embankments do not do that.
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2014 5:32 AM, "Erwin Olario"  wrote:


 First of all, kudos to the volunteers working in the Lubao area[0] in
 Pampanga for the level of details they are adding to OpenStreetMap.

 I do wonder, however, if the appropriate tags are being used. In this
 case,  paddy field levees are being tagged as highway=path, when in fact
 they are primarily used as embankments, not as paths.

 Many of us here in the mailing list would consider Lubao as a local
 showcase for OpenStreetMap and perhaps, like me, would like it to show what
 "Philippine Mapping Convention" is like in real life.

 I normally use the following tags for rice paddies:
 landuse=farmland
 crop=rice
 farm=flooded_crops

 What are your thoughts about tagging ways between paddies as
 man_made=dyke [1] over highway=path ?

 [0] http://osm.org/go/4zOPCCmZg-?m=
 [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Ddyke



 Erwin Olario
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 » email: er...@ngnuity.net | gov...@gmail.com
 » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013
 » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93
 D56B

 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

>>
>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] parcel lot details in Subic

[maning sambale]

The most common question by LGUs about OSM is whether it is possible
to add parcel data into the db.  I always said no primarily because of
legal concerns and I think it would be very difficult to map.

Unitl I saw this,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/14.88074/120.20926

Note that the mapper is using only iD.

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph