I don't think we can have any definitive solution here. People will
interact with the LGU of their preference or practicality despite what
boundaries on paper or laws state.
Long-time OSM mapper Rally have plenty of stories regarding people choosing
Taytay vs. Cainta.
My personal preference is to go with what laws state in absence of any
additional info. (Note that laws creating or converting LGUs almost always
have a "disclaimer" about boundary disputes.) Next in preference is a
variation of the "on-the-ground" rule: check what residents consider their
LGUs to be: where they vote, which LGUs they get their cedulas, or register
their businesses in, or file real estate taxes, etc.
~Eugene
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 4:06 AM Jherome Miguel
wrote:
> In light of previous incidents where there have been attempts to shoehorn
> some land developments (usually subdivisions or planned developments) into
> one LGU (usually a city or municipality, or a barangay) where legally it
> straddles two or more, e.g. the CCP Complex between Manila and Pasay, The
> Glens at Park Spring between San Pedro and Dasmariñas, I would want to
> start a discussion about dealing with legally-defined LGU boundaries where
> there have been a recent development built above it. I'm noticing there has
> been a tendency to place a certain land development across a long-existing
> legal boundary within one LGU, and I also admit I had that temptation in
> the past as well. ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
