Re: [talk-ph] DPWH bridge data attributes

2021-10-11 Thread Erwin Olario 
Good point, Ian. I'll see if the original request can be amended.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
» email: erwin@ *n**gnu**it**y**.xyz*

» mobile: https://t.me/GOwin
» OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B


On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:01 PM Ian Lopez  wrote:

> I have no objections with adding data in connection to this request, but
> it would be helpful if the last checked date (date of most recent
> inspection or survey by DPWH and/or its contractors) is present in the DPWH
> bridge inventory. Nonetheless, I'm hopeful that the request will be
> fulfilled and that the data will be released in due time.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ian Lopez
>
> -
> OpenStreetMap/Twitter/Telegram: ianlopez1115
> Facebook/Messenger: ian.lopez
>
>
> On Monday, October 11, 2021, 09:41:48 AM GMT+8, Erwin Olario <
> gov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> This is a re-post [0] of a query I made in the OSMph Telegram channel.
>
> I made an FOI request [1] from DPWH re their bridge inventory on behalf of
> the local community. They have additional requirements  (i.e. writing in
> "official letterhead", etc) but before I proceed, I'd like to know if there
> are any objections or concerns about this request from this channel.
>
> Depending on the quality of the data and if we get the permission to use
> the dataset,  it may be used to validate the information already in OSM, or
> conflate additional attributes not yet in OSM.
>
> /Erwin
>
> [0]: https://t.me/OSMph/20310
> [1]
> https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHgsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEURQV0gtMjM2NjM0MzM2MjA4DA
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> » email: erwin@ *n**gnu**it**y**.xyz*
> 
> » mobile: https://t.me/GOwin
> » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93
> D56B
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Data improvements in the Philippines

2021-10-11 Thread Andrew Wiseman via talk-ph 
Hi Erwin,

Thanks for the response! Could you share some of the examples where they don’t 
match so we can take a look?

The street names were added from address point data that we have. It was 
conflated from the address points to nearby street segments so it is possible 
that some might not be correct or may actually be for another nearby street, 
which is why I suggest that if you do want to use it it is verified on the 
ground. The address point data was collected through a variety of methods 
including field survey. 

Andrew 


Andrew Wiseman |  Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 | andrew_wise...@apple.com 



> On Oct 6, 2021, at 5:50 PM, Erwin Olario  wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrew. Thank you for sharing this.
> 
> May we know how this information was collected? I did some random checking in 
> my neighbourhood, and some of the names in your database don't match or only 
> partially match what's on the ground. 
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> » email: er...@ngnuity.xyz
> » mobile: https://t.me/GOwin
> » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 1:59 AM Andrew Wiseman via talk-ph 
>  wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> This is Andrew again from the Apple team. I wanted to let you know that we 
> are sharing street names missing from OSM in the Philippines under the ODbL 
> in case you were interested in taking a look. The data is in a geojson file 
> with line geometry, name and OSM way ID(s). There is more information and you 
> can download the file here: 
> https://github.com/osmlab/appledata/blob/master/STREETNAMES.md
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew
> 
> Andrew Wiseman |  Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 | andrew_wise...@apple.com
> 
>> On May 28, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Andrew Wiseman  wrote:
>> 
>> Hello talk-ph,
>> 
>> This is Andrew again from the Apple Maps team. We are planning to work on 
>> some data corrections and improvements to OSM in the Philippines around the 
>> road network — for example, sometimes there are missing roads or routing 
>> issues due to incorrect intersections or missing connections. We will make 
>> sure to follow the appropriate OSM and local guidelines.
>> 
>> In the future we also plan to do some improvements to coastal features and 
>> land use/land cover polygons, such as parks, university and hospital 
>> campuses, airports and similar features. Some examples may be things like 
>> coastlines and national parks that are missing a tag or are from old imports 
>> that may not be very accurate. I’ll reach out before we start that effort 
>> too. 
>> 
>> I wanted to see if you had any suggestions or feedback on the road network, 
>> such as if there are places we should take a look or other useful resources.
>> 
>> There is more information on our Github page: 
>> https://github.com/osmlab/appledata/issues/160
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Andrew 
>> 
>> Andrew Wiseman |  Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 | andrew_wise...@apple.com
>> 
> 
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] DPWH bridge data attributes

2021-10-11 Thread Ian Lopez via talk-ph 
I have no objections with adding data in connection to this request, but it 
would be helpful if the last checked date (date of most recent inspection or 
survey by DPWH and/or its contractors) is present in the DPWH bridge inventory. 
Nonetheless, I'm hopeful that the request will be fulfilled and that the data 
will be released in due time.
Regards,
Ian Lopez
-
 OpenStreetMap/Twitter/Telegram: ianlopez1115
Facebook/Messenger: ian.lopez 

On Monday, October 11, 2021, 09:41:48 AM GMT+8, Erwin Olario 
 wrote:  
 
 This is a re-post [0] of a query I made in the OSMph Telegram channel.

I made an FOI request [1] from DPWH re their bridge inventory on behalf of the 
local community. They have additional requirements  (i.e. writing in "official 
letterhead", etc) but before I proceed, I'd like to know if there are any 
objections or concerns about this request from this channel. 
Depending on the quality of the data and if we get the permission to use the 
dataset,  it may be used to validate the information already in OSM, or 
conflate additional attributes not yet in OSM.
/Erwin

[0]: https://t.me/OSMph/20310[1] 
https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHgsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEURQV0gtMjM2NjM0MzM2MjA4DA

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - » email: er...@ngnuity.xyz » mobile: 
https://t.me/GOwin» OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 
81CE 3A93 D56B___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph