Re: [talk-ph] Allowed uses of map

2011-01-13 Thread sorabsuperstar
 [http://www.gmanews.tv/story/210236/afp-eyes-transfer-of-major-service-commands-to-camp-aguinaldo]
 Is this an allowed use of OpenStreetMap? Is the Base map from 
 OpenStreetMap sufficient?

 BTW, nice use of OSM. ;-)

But yet it is non-licence-complaint use of OSM.

A correct notification for this map could for example look like
 © OpenStreetMap contributors and GMANews.TV, CC-BY-SA

This said, it is pretty obvious to me that GMA did not act in bad faith. They 
tried to give attribution to OSM, they just don't know how to do it the right 
way :P
Theoretically problematic is that the license tag is missing too. So 
technically speaking they did not relicense their derivative work share alike. 
But practically I do not think that anyone wants to reuse that image anyway.

Btw: License or not, it is certainly not a copyright violation if Wayne posts 
the link to that website in an email. :)

Cheers
soeren___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


[talk-ph] Garminasus A50 and Maning's OSM-Gamin-files

2011-01-13 Thread sorabsuperstar
Hi all (particularly maning)

I just installed Maning's OSM-Garmin-file conversion 
([http://esambale.wikispaces.com/osmphil_garmin]) on my new A50 (the Gaminasus 
Android phone).
And - Hooray - it works. Kudos to Maning, Garmin and Asus. The A50 acts like 
any other Garmin device in terms of ./map/gsuppmap.img

However what I observed is that there is a huge number of placetags recognized 
as Cities. Not only each Brgy and subdivisions thereof, but even single 
buildings with names.
In result the phone apparently can't handle the data flood and indexes only the 
first few hundred entrees for each initial letter. E.g. for M from M'lang, 
North Cotabato to Maharlika.
Did anyone observe the same on Garmin devices? Any idea how to fix it?

cheers
Soeren

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


[talk-ph] Google's Ed

2008-12-25 Thread sorabsuperstar
Hi all,

and merry Christmas. :)

Regarding the issue of Wikimapia using googles images for tracing, while we 
don't because we honor google's IP (...),
I would just like to update you that I do not take any action yet, because I am 
still monitoring the outcome of this talk on Ed Parsons Blog 
(http://www.edparsons.com/2008/10/who-map-is-it-anyway/). Apparently the public 
already increases the pressure on PArsons and Google to clarify the situation. 
Best case scenario: Google will generally allow it. 
However if they expressly forbit it and eforce this generally, it is also fine. 
Worst case scenario is what we have right now: Google is not allowing it, but 
tacitly tolerate it from Wikimapia; which in practical result means that decent 
projects like OSM are punished for their respect for google's IP.

Lets see. Eventually google has to react to this. They are tooo big to hide 
behind the tree. :)

Happy New YEar 

Soeren


___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] another road renamed, another border duspute

2008-12-17 Thread sorabsuperstar
Hi guys,

sorry, i can hardly follow up anymore. I made the mistake to join three global 
OSM-talk-groups (talk, talk-legal and legal-general) and since then my inbox is 
BLOW AWAY by incomming traffic :/

Reg. the matter at hand:
It is in fact a little bit tricky. Buendia Ave is tagged Senator Gil Puyat on a 
large strip now.
Hmm. To be honest - and this is nothing against Senator Puyat - but I 
absolutely dont know anyone who calls that Street Puyat rather than Buendia. At 
least not the Makati portion of it.
I think it should be name= and alt_name= for the names commonly used, i.e. the 
name ppl on the street actually use for that street. The rederers should 
display them as something like [name]([alt_name]), which they dont do yet, 
afaik.
old_name= should be used for a former name, that is commonly accepted as 
derelicted. A tag new_name= might be used for a new name, that has not yet been 
commonly adopted ... and then eventually become alt_name, then name. OSM is a 
living map,that will adopt changes in the realworld at any time.

Displaying historic names (i.e. names that fall under old_name=) on the normal 
map will make it confusing. For a historic map, someone should create a special 
historic-renderer. (That's the good thing about OSM, that you can use the data 
in many different ways.)

Cheers

Soren

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
 Gesendet: 17.12.08 03:31:20
 An: Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
 CC: OSM talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 Betreff: Re: [talk-ph] another road renamed, another border duspute

 Can't see why not.
 
 On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
  Can we invent a new tag? Something like old_name_until=2008 to go with
  old_name?
 
  Some names are so old (like Gov. Forbes for A.H. Lacson Ave. in Sampaloc or
  even Dewey Boulevard for Roxas Boulevard) that most people don't know them
  anymore.
 
  Renderers can then render the name of the street like name (old name) and
  dropping out the (old name) part if the old name is more than X years old,
  where X is a renderer-specified number.
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:51 AM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  In updating renamed roads, can we add alternate names
  like
  old_name:Timog Avenue
  name:GMA Drive
 
  Or something similar to that effect?  For instance Gil Puyat is still
  popularly known as Buendia (Boonja in some
  foreign-made-highly-inaccurate-maps)
 
 
 
  On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:16 PM, ian lopez ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com
  wrote:
   From what I had read in the recent days, 11th Jamboree Street from eds
   to
   Timog Avenue is now known as GMA Drive. This is similar to renaming
   Scout
   Albano to Eugenio Lopez, Jr. Drive a few years back.
  
   Also, portions of Barangay San Lorenzo are being relocated to Barangays
   Pio
   del Pilar and Bangkal, whcih is technically illegal (in my opinion),
   since
   it needs a law to be passed by both houses of Congress and the
   President's
   signature for it to be oficial. I'm not concerned with the motives
   behind
   it. Rather, I'm putting this up as a reminder: don't move the boundaries
   (for now).
  
   These challenges for us isn't that exciting anyway. But I'm posting it
   for
   information's sake.
  
  
   ___
   talk-ph mailing list
   talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
   http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  cheers,
  maning
  --
  Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
  wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
  blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
  --
 
  ___
  talk-ph mailing list
  talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 
 
 
  --
  http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 cheers,
 maning
 --
 Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
 wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
 blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
 --
 
 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 



___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] wikipage philippines clean-up

2008-12-02 Thread sorabsuperstar
@ local tag: I endorse loc_place or at least ph_place
as it looks the underscore is the established syntax in OSM for something like 
that (see loc_name , reg_name, nat_name, etc

@ disputes and virtual shotguns: Joke lang, M8 :)

Cheers 


 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: maning sambale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Gesendet: 02.12.08 11:37:59
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CC: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 Betreff: Re: [talk-ph] wikipage philippines clean-up

 I'd vote for:
 place=village
 place:ph=barangay
 plus maybe an admin_level=9 or is it too much?
 
 and create a wikipage expalining ph specific tags
 
 cheers,
 maning
 
 On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:05 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Sure,
 
  It's the very point in Wikisystems, that many ppl together put together the 
  arcticles :)
  I dont think we need something like an actual Wiki-Admin yet, since we 
  are a very small goup.
 
  What I intended to do ist cleaning up our recommendations for effective 
  mapping in the Philippines (i.e. tagging conventions ;)). And put this to a 
  seperate wikipage, every neeby should read before starting :)
 
  Where are we at with the Brgy tagging issue?
  I suggest to leave the place tag as is (i.e. village for brgys)
  However introducing an additional loc_place/nat_place tag to takes 
  account of local concepts - as in the Philippines the Baragay is - is a 
  good idea in my opinion, but should be a global concept and thus should be 
  elevated to the root of OSM.
 
  Cheers
 
 
 
 
  -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
  Von: Eugene Alvin Villar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Gesendet: 26.11.08 16:56:40
  An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Betreff: Re: [talk-ph] wikipage philippines clean-up
 
 
  I can probably prep up the image I used on http://en.wikipedia.org/
  wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines for OSM. :-)
 
 
   On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I was already thinking of doing this,
   however I would suggest to wait till we are at one about certain
  tagging rules.
 
   Cheers
   Soren
   
 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: maning sambale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Gesendet: 26.11.08 07:38:35
 An: talk-ph talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 Betreff: Re: [talk-ph] wikipage philippines clean-up
 
 
 
  
 I'm thinking maybe we can pimp this page a bit to be more
  enticing to
 new Pinoy mappers.

 On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:36 PM, maning sambale
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi, I posted this in the talk of
  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:WikiProject_Philippines.
 
  Somebody might be interested be a wiki admin (me is poor in
  wiki
  editing)
 
  Can we clean this up a bit? I think this should be the main
  page of
  what we do in the Philippines. Currenlty, it a clutter of
  loose notes
  about everything and anything on OSM philippines. A separate
  page
  perhaps about metromanila and other provinces, tagging
  conventions,
  and neat stuff you do with the data. Maning
 
  cheers,
  maning
  --
  |-|
  --|
  | __.-._ |Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great. -
  Yoda |
  | '-._7' |Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.
  Branden|
  | /'.-c |Linux registered user #402901, http://counter.li.org/
  |
  | | /T |http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ |
  | _)_/L I http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ |
  |-|
  --|
 



 --
 |-|--
  |
 | __.-._ |Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great. -Yoda |
 | '-._7' |Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.
  Branden|
 | /'.-c |Linux registered user #402901, http://counter.li.org/ |
 | | /T |http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ |
 | _)_/L I http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ |
 |-|--
  |

 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

   
   
 
 
 
   ___
   talk-ph mailing list
  talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 
 
 
  --
  http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  talk-ph mailing list
  talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 |-|--|
 | __.-._  |Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great. -Yoda |
 | '-._7' |Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden|
 |  /'.-c  |Linux registered user #402901, http://counter.li.org/ |
 |  |  /T  |http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ |
 | _)_/L I http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ |