Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - RFC - Public Transport
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) te...@teddy.ch wrote: Other mappers want to map a stop_position. At the moment they abuse highway=bus_stop as stop_position. What do you suggest these mappers to use for as stop_position? If someone maps a single node on the way and calls it highway=bus_stop, then that should be OK (but not recommended). If someone then wants to put highway=bus_stop nodes on either side, that should be seen as the more correct tagging. The original node should be stripped of it's highway=bus_stop tag, or changed to something meaningless like highway=bus_stop_group_centroid or highway=bus_stop_position (if it genuinely is a stopping position, rather than a group centroid). Richard ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - RFC - Public Transport
On 12/29/2010 12:30 AM, Richard Mann wrote: If someone maps a single node on the way and calls it highway=bus_stop, then that should be OK (but not recommended). unified_stoparea recommends that. You would allow but not recommend it, correct? If someone then wants to put highway=bus_stop nodes on either side, that should be seen as the more correct tagging. The original node should be stripped of it's highway=bus_stop tag, or changed to something meaningless like highway=bus_stop_group_centroid or highway=bus_stop_position (if it genuinely is a stopping position, rather than a group centroid). What about changing it to platform, if it is really the platform/pole? Regards Teddy ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
