Re: [Talk-us] Can-Amera border, states and provinces.

2009-08-16 Thread Minh Nguyen
Ngày 8/15/09 12:48 PM, Sam Vekemans viết:
 Also,
 Perhaps explaining (on the wiki, as an example) why the boarder between
 Spain  Portugal shows up lighter than the border between Germany and
 Poland.  As that might give the reader a clue, and better understanding
 of the issue.

 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.5lon=9.2zoom=4layers=B000FTF
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.5lon=9.2zoom=4layers=B000FTF

 Or maybe if there is another wiki page somewhere else that explains it.
 In that case, a link would suffice.

Someone on either the dev or U.S. list explained that borders with fewer 
twists and turns will show up lighter when zoomed out. That is, Mapnik 
doesn't perform any smoothing on country boundaries yet.

Also, changeset 17070 [1] sounds like an attempt to address this issue.

[1] http://trac.osm.org/changeset/17070

-- 
Minh Nguyen m...@zoomtown.com
[[en:User:Mxn]] [[vi:User:Mxn]] [[m:User:Mxn]]
AIM: trycom2000; Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] [Talk-ca] Can-Amera border, states and provinces.

2009-08-16 Thread Richard Weait
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, James Ewenve6...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Richard Weaitrich...@weait.com wrote:

 I think the provincial / state borders will continue to be yucky on
 the main map until mapnik supports rendering different style sheets
 per region / country.

 My thoughts exactly, but does the OSM project support
 continent/country wide style sheets? I suspect not, so the next step
 would be to figure out who to query about this, and whether it would
 be concept that would be supported. Would this be something that would
 be up to the end user?

Well we are all the OSM project, so regional styles would have some
support; you and me at least. ;-)  How to implement it?  That's a
question.

 If understand the concept, the main slippy map is just a place to show
 what is in the database, and it would be up to the end user to render
 tiles and create a display mechanism for their own use.

So, IF mapnik / osmarender supported regions style sheets,
and IF regional style sheets existed for USA and Canada,
and IF the Foundation / server team decided to support the idea,
then the main site could serve regional tiles to all who visit.

I think that the first two points are the tricky ones.

 We, in North America, get to see what is
 essentially a European style sheet, and as those countries are
 smaller, rendering their states / provinces at zoom 3 is just as
 stupid as not rendering ours at zoom 3.

 Yes, I agree that there's no way that we can come up with a style
 sheet that will work everywhere.

Well it won't be ideal to the eyes of everyone.  The current mapnik
style, for example is about a bajillion times prettier than the old
vectors and 8 colours from early on in the project.  SteveC (if I
remember correctly) put up a slide at SotM showing the old rendering.
The difference and progress is nothing short of stunning.

Thank you, Steve Chilton and other cartographers!

 I think that's why the mantra Don't
 tag for the renderers has come to be. People are trying to tag things
 so they render on the slippy map in a manner in which they would like
 to see.

 I think that some of that is being done already anyway, since the
 major highways in Alberta at least have been bumped up from Primary to
 Trunk, and now to Motorway. With them tagged as Trunk or Motorway they
 show up until zoom level 5, with Primary roads disappearing at zoom
 level 7. You need to be at zoom level 5 before you can see the whole
 province, but the provincial admin boundary doesn't show up until zoom
 level 11.

Right.  Er, correct, and it looks wrong.

Anybody can fix this.  I played with mapnik a bit, just to see the
provinces. Please be gentle to my delicate server and connection.

http://weait.com/maps/?zoom=2lat=44.70531lon=-83.54813layers=0B0

So with a server and connectivity, and a slightly-revised version of
the default style, anybody can serve a better OSM for Canada than the
current default.  Same goes for USA and state borders.  No
Mapnik/osmarender changes required.

Would the main OSM site connect to and defer to the regional server?
I don't know.  How would traffic compare on the regional sites?  I
don't know.

I'll keep working on the style as I learn more about mapnik.  I'll
probably have a mapnik article on my site in the next little while
too.

Best regards,
Richard

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Status of TIGER update

2009-08-16 Thread Apollinaris Schoell

no info in the wiki.
Is this documented somewhere?


On Aug 16, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Chris Hunter wrote:

Looks like the 2008 data for my area (TN) just got uploaded about 5  
hours ago if I did the time conversion right.


On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Richard Shank deve...@zestic.com  
wrote:
I was wonder what the status is of the update with the 2008 TIGER  
data.

Who is handling that?  Also, will part of this include adding address
data to OSM from the TIGER data.

Richard

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Status of TIGER update

2009-08-16 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Chris Hunterchunter...@gmail.com wrote:
 Looks like the 2008 data for my area (TN) just got uploaded about 5 hours
 ago if I did the time conversion right.

That was just the place boundaries data, which didn't exist in OSM
until this upload.  Updating the TIGER street data and adding
addressing is going to be a far more involved problem...


Chris (aka TIGERcnl)

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us