[Talk-us] Unpaved streets
Hello, In my neighborhood there are some unpaved residential streets. How should those be tagged? highway=track highway=residential surface=unpaved BTW does highway=residential imply surface=paved? Thanks in advance, N. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Unpaved streets
ian wrote: On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Nakor nakor...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In my neighborhood there are some unpaved residential streets. How should those be tagged? highway=track highway=residential surface=unpaved That's how I've been doing it. do you have a way of rendering those unpaved streets distinctively? paul =- paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 61.7 degrees) ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Unpaved streets
On 09/03/2009 09:17 AM, Ian Dees wrote: No tag should ever imply any other tag. It's always better to be more verbose than not. No it's not. Are you seriously putting oneway=no (just to name one example) on every street you tag? -Alex Mauer hawke signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] TopOSM Colorado
Hi All! It's been a while since the last TopOSM update, but I haven't been resting. After Massachusetts, I decided to pick a state with somewhat more interesting topography: Colorado. http://toposm.com/co/ There are still a few rough edges and things that are missing (like the map legend), so consider it a preview. TopOSM-CO has a few important differences from TopOSM-MA: * Color-by-elevation in base layer. * Contour lines and hillshading generated from NED [1]. * Hydrography (lakes, rivers, wetlands etc) from NHD [2]. * The hillshading, contour lines and map features are on separate layers. Use the layer switcher (top right +) to toggle. Since the data is nationwide, the same technique could (theoretically) be used to generate a complete TopOSM map of the US, or even the world by using e.g. SRTM for elevation and OSM for hydrography. I'll update the TopOSM wiki page [3] with the changes in this version as soon as I can. - Lars [1] National Elevation Dataset. Available for the entire US. http://ned.usgs.gov/ [2] National Hydrography Dataset. Available for the entire US. There is some effort to import this into OSM, but we're not there yet. http://nhd.usgs.gov/ [3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TopOSM -- Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] TopOSM Colorado
TopOSM-CO has a few important differences from TopOSM-MA: What, MASSGIS doesn't cover Aspen? * Color-by-elevation in base layer. interesting * Contour lines and hillshading generated from NED [1]. does that mean you're interpolating lines from a grid? * Hydrography (lakes, rivers, wetlands etc) from NHD [2]. which will eventually be in OSM * The hillshading, contour lines and map features are on separate layers. Use the layer switcher (top right +) to toggle. AWESOME. that's beautiful. Since the data is nationwide, the same technique could (theoretically) be used to generate a complete TopOSM map of the US, or even the world by using e.g. SRTM for elevation and OSM for hydrography. requiring only a render farm plus some config ? Use any perl in ingesting or anything? -- Bill n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
