[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2012-12-26

2012-12-27 Thread Dave Hansen
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:

http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl

If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask.  However, please do not send me private mail.  The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@ list, others can benefit.

Downloads:

http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2012-12-26

Map to visualize what each file contains:


http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2012-12-26/kml/kml.html


FAQ



Why did you do this?

I wrote scripts to joined them myself to lessen the impact
of doing a large join on Lambertus's server.  I've also
cut them in large longitude swaths that should fit conveniently
on removable media.  

http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2012-12-26

Can or should I seed the torrents?

Yes!!  If you use the .torrent files, please seed.  That web
server is in the UK, and it helps to have some peers on this
side of the Atlantic.

Why is my map missing small rectangular areas?

There have been some missing tiles from Lambertus's map (the
red rectangles),  I don't see any at the moment, so you may
want to update if you had issues with the last set.

Why can I not copy the large files to my new SD card?

If you buy a new card (especially SDHC), some are FAT16 from
the factory.  I had to reformat it to let me create a 2GB
file.

Does your map cover Mexico/Canada?

Yes!!  I have, for the purposes of this map, annexed Ontario
in to the USA.  Some areas of North America that are close
to the US also just happen to get pulled in to these maps.
This might not happen forever, and if you would like your
non-US area to get included, let me know. 

-- Dave


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] shawnee county landuse

2012-12-27 Thread Mike Dupont
Well I have been looking into the law today, and I talked to the gis expert
at the county.
First of all we are not importing the peoples names, so anyone doing a mass
mailing would be be just getting the address.
The data that we imported is being bought by many companies he said. And
the address information is being also available from the post as well.
I am going to talk to more people in the county or the state, but my first
contact said there should be no problem. All we are importing is the fact
that there is a house there with that number and the zipcode and the type
of landuse.


On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
 wrote:

 Sorry, I did not finish that. I have already written to legal about it.
 Trulia and Zillow are using this data in full. I have stripped out all
 personal and contact information so I think that it should not fall under
 the no selling of contact info clause.
 The data is basically PD/ disclaimed
 http://www.snco.us/Ap/B_prop/Disclaimer.shtm

 the relevant law is :

 Kansas Open Records Act Statement

 By accessing this site, you are required to make the following
 certification pursuant to K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2): the requester does not
 intend to, and will not: (A) Use any list of names or addresses contained
 in or derived from the records or information for the purpose of selling or
 offering for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any
 person who resides at any address listed; or (B) sell, give or otherwise
 make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in or
 derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that
 person to sell or offer for sale any property or service to any person
 listed or to any person who resides at any address listed.

 maybe you could say that you can use osm to create an address db, but i
 think we should look into it
 mike


 On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Mike Dupont 
 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:

 2.   **What is the license that this data is under? I did not see a
 copyright statement.

 This is basically PD data from the government. under the open data act
 the only restriction is that the
 http://kansasstatutes.lesterama.org/Chapter_45/Article_2/#45-216




 --
 James Michael DuPont
 Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
 Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion
 http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
 Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
 Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
 Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3




-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Proposed import: Alaska Boroughs/CPDs

2012-12-27 Thread Jeff Meyer
Paul -

I'm grateful for your efforts here.

I'd like to use this import as a test case for further discussing our
current import guidelines and policies.

In particular:
- Is 3 days a suitable duration for reviewing proposed imports?
- Should there be an entry for this import on the Import Catalogue page?
- Should the Alaska import use a separate account from other imports you've
coordinated?

Yes, these q's may sound a little snarky (hopefully in a friendly way ; )
), but I am sincerely interested in resolving answers to these questions so
we can help clarify guidance moving forward.

(my take on the answers are: no (2 weeks minimum), no (that page is a
disaster), and no clue.)

Thanks, Jeff


On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
  From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
  Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed import: Alaska Boroughs/CPDs
 
  Given that the comments received have been generally positive and the
  concerns raised are addressed I'm going to go ahead and start post-
  processing the data so I can merge it in as well as figuring out how the
  heck to identify all the existing imported borough/CPD boundaries, all
  tagged differently.
 
  Completed successfully. Because the boundaries are now much less nodey
 the
  boundaries went from about 170k nodes to 25k nodes.
 
  I added wikipedia=* and website=* tags as applicable. Wikipedia tags
 should
  help Nominatim determine importance when there are two places with the
 same
  name.
 
  As most states aren't adding counties at the rate that Alaska has added
  boroughs I doubt it'll come up again but I documented the SQL I used to
  identify and delete the existing boundaries without conflicts on deleted
  nodes at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Alaska/TIGER_Counties.

 Thanks for cleaning this up.

 Toby

 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us




-- 
Jeff Meyer
Global World History Atlas
www.gwhat.org
j...@gwhat.org
206-676-2347
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] shawnee county landuse

2012-12-27 Thread Toby Murray
While we didn't discuss it in terms of this specific law, this does
match my conversation with the Riley county GIS department. As long as
names aren't used, they do not have any problems with their
information being used in OSM.

Toby


On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Mike  Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Well I have been looking into the law today, and I talked to the gis expert
 at the county.
 First of all we are not importing the peoples names, so anyone doing a mass
 mailing would be be just getting the address.
 The data that we imported is being bought by many companies he said. And the
 address information is being also available from the post as well.
 I am going to talk to more people in the county or the state, but my first
 contact said there should be no problem. All we are importing is the fact
 that there is a house there with that number and the zipcode and the type of
 landuse.


 On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Mike Dupont
 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Sorry, I did not finish that. I have already written to legal about it.
 Trulia and Zillow are using this data in full. I have stripped out all
 personal and contact information so I think that it should not fall under
 the no selling of contact info clause.
 The data is basically PD/ disclaimed
 http://www.snco.us/Ap/B_prop/Disclaimer.shtm

 the relevant law is :

 Kansas Open Records Act Statement

 By accessing this site, you are required to make the following
 certification pursuant to K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2): the requester does not
 intend to, and will not: (A) Use any list of names or addresses contained in
 or derived from the records or information for the purpose of selling or
 offering for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any
 person who resides at any address listed; or (B) sell, give or otherwise
 make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in or
 derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that
 person to sell or offer for sale any property or service to any person
 listed or to any person who resides at any address listed.

 maybe you could say that you can use osm to create an address db, but i
 think we should look into it
 mike


 On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Mike Dupont
 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:

 2.   What is the license that this data is under? I did not see a
 copyright statement.

 This is basically PD data from the government. under the open data act
 the only restriction is that the
 http://kansasstatutes.lesterama.org/Chapter_45/Article_2/#45-216




 --
 James Michael DuPont
 Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
 Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion
 http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
 Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
 Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
 Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3




 --
 James Michael DuPont
 Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
 Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
 Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
 Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
 Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3

 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] shawnee county landuse

2012-12-27 Thread Jeff Meyer
Given the extreme concern many people have about protecting the integrity
of OSM data, why not just get a brief email from Riley County GIS stating
just that? If there's no explicit statement clarifying this on the web, an
email from a county official would be better safe than sorry, no?

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:

 While we didn't discuss it in terms of this specific law, this does
 match my conversation with the Riley county GIS department. As long as
 names aren't used, they do not have any problems with their
 information being used in OSM.

 Toby


 On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Mike  Dupont
 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
  Well I have been looking into the law today, and I talked to the gis
 expert
  at the county.
  First of all we are not importing the peoples names, so anyone doing a
 mass
  mailing would be be just getting the address.
  The data that we imported is being bought by many companies he said. And
 the
  address information is being also available from the post as well.
  I am going to talk to more people in the county or the state, but my
 first
  contact said there should be no problem. All we are importing is the fact
  that there is a house there with that number and the zipcode and the
 type of
  landuse.
 
 
  On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Mike Dupont
  jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
  Sorry, I did not finish that. I have already written to legal about it.
  Trulia and Zillow are using this data in full. I have stripped out all
  personal and contact information so I think that it should not fall
 under
  the no selling of contact info clause.
  The data is basically PD/ disclaimed
  http://www.snco.us/Ap/B_prop/Disclaimer.shtm
 
  the relevant law is :
 
  Kansas Open Records Act Statement
 
  By accessing this site, you are required to make the following
  certification pursuant to K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2): the requester does not
  intend to, and will not: (A) Use any list of names or addresses
 contained in
  or derived from the records or information for the purpose of selling or
  offering for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any
  person who resides at any address listed; or (B) sell, give or otherwise
  make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained
 in or
  derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that
  person to sell or offer for sale any property or service to any person
  listed or to any person who resides at any address listed.
 
  maybe you could say that you can use osm to create an address db, but i
  think we should look into it
  mike
 
 
  On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Mike Dupont
  jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
  2.   What is the license that this data is under? I did not see a
  copyright statement.
 
  This is basically PD data from the government. under the open data act
  the only restriction is that the
  http://kansasstatutes.lesterama.org/Chapter_45/Article_2/#45-216
 
 
 
 
  --
  James Michael DuPont
  Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
  Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion
  http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
  Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
  Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
  Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow
 http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3
 
 
 
 
  --
  James Michael DuPont
  Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
  Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion
 http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
  Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
  Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
  Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow
 http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3
 
  ___
  Talk-us mailing list
  Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
 

 ___
 Imports mailing list
 impo...@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports




-- 
Jeff Meyer
Global World History Atlas
www.gwhat.org
j...@gwhat.org
206-676-2347
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] shawnee county landuse

2012-12-27 Thread Mike Dupont
This is about shawnee county, not riley. I am working on getting a
written confirmation, until then I will not import any more data, just
continue to clean up what I have imported.
mike

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
 While we didn't discuss it in terms of this specific law, this does
 match my conversation with the Riley county GIS department. As long as
 names aren't used, they do not have any problems with their
 information being used in OSM.

 Toby


 On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Mike  Dupont
 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Well I have been looking into the law today, and I talked to the gis expert
 at the county.
 First of all we are not importing the peoples names, so anyone doing a mass
 mailing would be be just getting the address.
 The data that we imported is being bought by many companies he said. And the
 address information is being also available from the post as well.
 I am going to talk to more people in the county or the state, but my first
 contact said there should be no problem. All we are importing is the fact
 that there is a house there with that number and the zipcode and the type of
 landuse.


 On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Mike Dupont
 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Sorry, I did not finish that. I have already written to legal about it.
 Trulia and Zillow are using this data in full. I have stripped out all
 personal and contact information so I think that it should not fall under
 the no selling of contact info clause.
 The data is basically PD/ disclaimed
 http://www.snco.us/Ap/B_prop/Disclaimer.shtm

 the relevant law is :

 Kansas Open Records Act Statement

 By accessing this site, you are required to make the following
 certification pursuant to K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2): the requester does not
 intend to, and will not: (A) Use any list of names or addresses contained in
 or derived from the records or information for the purpose of selling or
 offering for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any
 person who resides at any address listed; or (B) sell, give or otherwise
 make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in or
 derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that
 person to sell or offer for sale any property or service to any person
 listed or to any person who resides at any address listed.

 maybe you could say that you can use osm to create an address db, but i
 think we should look into it
 mike


 On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Mike Dupont
 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:

 2.   What is the license that this data is under? I did not see a
 copyright statement.

 This is basically PD data from the government. under the open data act
 the only restriction is that the
 http://kansasstatutes.lesterama.org/Chapter_45/Article_2/#45-216




 --
 James Michael DuPont
 Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
 Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion
 http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
 Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
 Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
 Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3




 --
 James Michael DuPont
 Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
 Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
 Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
 Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
 Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3

 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us



-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] shawnee county landuse

2012-12-27 Thread Richard Welty

On 12/27/12 2:46 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:

This is about shawnee county, not riley. I am working on getting a
written confirmation, until then I will not import any more data, just
continue to clean up what I have imported.


thank you.

we really do need to take this much care whenever we bring in a new data 
source.


richard


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us