Re: [Talk-us] Feature Proposal - RFC - Marijuana

2014-01-02 Thread Martijn van Exel
I would look at how these places are already tagged in, say,
Amsterdam. I know, I should know, having lived there for 20 years, but
I don't :p

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Adam Schreiber
 wrote:
> Perhaps shop=marijuana, marijuana:recreational=yes/no,
> marijuana:medicinal=yes/no, marijuana:paraphernalia=yes/no,
> marijuana:edibles=yes/no?
>
> Cheers,
> Adam
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
>  wrote:
>>
>> 2014/1/3 Russell Deffner 
>>>
>>> Maybe more so if you are in Colorado, as sales of Marijuana to adults (for
>>> recreation/any use) began the morning of the first.  Therefor I propose the
>>> usage of shop=marijuana for this new business, have created a wiki-page for
>>> the proposal -
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Marijuana, and will
>>> leave it open for a commenting period of no shorter than two weeks.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> the proposal is quite specific, you write: "a shop that is a State or other
>> licensed facility allowed to sell marijuana for recreation use."
>> not sure if those two requirements (license and recreation use) are
>> fundamental. What about a shop that sells marijuana in an area where no
>> license is required, or a shop that sells it for religious use? Maybe you
>> could go without them (e.g. "a shop selling primarily marijuana") or choose
>> your alternative wording (any use instead of recreation).
>>
>> cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us



-- 
Martijn van Exel
President, US Chapter
OpenStreetMap
http://openstreetmap.us/
http://osm.org/

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Feature Proposal - RFC - Marijuana

2014-01-02 Thread Adam Schreiber
Perhaps shop=marijuana, marijuana:recreational=yes/no,
marijuana:medicinal=yes/no, marijuana:paraphernalia=yes/no,
marijuana:edibles=yes/no?

Cheers,
Adam

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
 wrote:
>
> 2014/1/3 Russell Deffner 
>>
>> Maybe more so if you are in Colorado, as sales of Marijuana to adults (for
>> recreation/any use) began the morning of the first.  Therefor I propose the
>> usage of shop=marijuana for this new business, have created a wiki-page for
>> the proposal -
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Marijuana, and will
>> leave it open for a commenting period of no shorter than two weeks.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> the proposal is quite specific, you write: "a shop that is a State or other
> licensed facility allowed to sell marijuana for recreation use."
> not sure if those two requirements (license and recreation use) are
> fundamental. What about a shop that sells marijuana in an area where no
> license is required, or a shop that sells it for religious use? Maybe you
> could go without them (e.g. "a shop selling primarily marijuana") or choose
> your alternative wording (any use instead of recreation).
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Feature Proposal - RFC - Marijuana

2014-01-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014/1/3 Russell Deffner 

> Maybe more so if you are in Colorado, as sales of Marijuana to adults (for
> recreation/any use) began the morning of the first.  Therefor I propose the
> usage of shop=marijuana for this new business, have created a wiki-page for
> the proposal -
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Marijuana, and will
> leave it open for a commenting period of no shorter than two weeks.
>
>
>


the proposal is quite specific, you write: "a shop that is a State or other
licensed facility allowed to sell marijuana for recreation use."
not sure if those two requirements (license and recreation use) are
fundamental. What about a shop that sells marijuana in an area where no
license is required, or a shop that sells it for religious use? Maybe you
could go without them (e.g. "a shop selling primarily marijuana") or choose
your alternative wording (any use instead of recreation).

cheers,
Martin
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


[Talk-us] Feature Proposal - RFC - Marijuana

2014-01-02 Thread Russell Deffner
Happy New Year,

 

Maybe more so if you are in Colorado, as sales of Marijuana to adults (for
recreation/any use) began the morning of the first.  Therefor I propose the
usage of shop=marijuana for this new business, have created a wiki-page for
the proposal -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Marijuana, and will
leave it open for a commenting period of no shorter than two weeks.

 

Cheers,

=Russ

 

russdeffner on OSM  

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] USBRS WikiProject seeks volunteers

2014-01-02 Thread Paul Johnson
I'm interested in working 66 current and future routes in Oklahoma and
Tulsa/Fort Smith/Ponca City-adjacent regions of Kansas, Missouri and
Arkansas; possibly slightly farther out than that depending on how well I
know the land.


On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 4:23 PM, stevea  wrote:

> OSM's USBRS WikiProject (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
> wiki/WikiProject_U.S._Bicycle_Route_System) seeks volunteers to help map
> new proposed United States Bicycle Routes.  Please see the Proposed Routes
> section of that wiki, a reference and status report for the project.  Right
> now,
>
> USBR 10 in Washington state
> USBR 11 in Virginia
> USBR 30 in Wisconsin
> USBRs 35, 36 and 50 in Indiana
> USBR 66 in California, New Mexico and Oklahoma
> USBR 76 in Wyoming and
> USBR 90 in Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana
>
> are emerging proposed routes.  Very helpful would be additional
> experienced OSM volunteers, comfortable editing OSM relations, to create
> and/or improve the proposed bicycle routes in these areas, largely by
> adding route members to a new relation from a soft-copy map or text
> description of the proposed route.
>
> If you wish to help build our national bicycle network in OSM, please
> contact Kerry Irons of the Adventure Cycling Association, a long-time
> contributor to these talk-us pages.  Kerry will match you with a route, and
> email-introduce you to a statewide USBR coordinator -- your primary contact
> -- who provides route data for you to enter into OSM.  Meanwhile, the wiki
> page offers any necessary OSM technical guidance, as well as acts as a
> progress reporting mechanism. Volunteer stevea in California (
> stevea...@softworkers.com) is acting OSM coach and wiki maintainer on the
> project, please cc: him on your USBR coordinator emails.
>
> It is important to communicate your intentions, progress and completions
> via email or preferably wiki.  The project has established process and
> enjoys new growth by asking widely for additional volunteers, so please pay
> attention to the many moving parts by keeping the communication flowing
> where it needs to.  (Get route data from a state USBR coordinator, update
> your progress in the wiki or send email to stevea to do so).  USBRS is
> nearly 10,000 kilometers and has momentum to grow to 20,000 in the
> medium-term future.  Help out by adopting a route near you!
>
> Though this work isn't difficult, each route might take a few hours of
> effort starting with a few emails.  After you add a proposed route to OSM,
> one reward is to see the dashed red lines of a proposed USBR blossom in
> Cycle Map layer.  Other rewards happen for on-the-ground participants
> (cities, counties, state DOTs, the public, stakeholders, bicycle coalition
> groups...), who see the newly proposed route in our plastic, widely
> available map.  This encourages consensus of the proposed route to emerge
> in a geographically friendly way, facilitating harmonious progress towards
> AASHTO approval.  Then, once a route is approved by AASHTO, its
> "state=proposed" tag is simply deleted in OSM.
>
> To begin your contributions to this OSM WikiProject, email Kerry on
> irons54vortex at gmail (dot) com.  Put "USBR mapping in OSM" in the Subject
> line and tell him where you like to map.  Thank you!
>
> (Kerry and I worked on this volunteer solicitation together -- it very
> much comes from not just him but from both of us.)
>
> SteveA
> California
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us