Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

2017-01-04 Thread Ian Dees 
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Mike N  wrote:

> On 1/4/2017 9:58 PM, James Mast wrote:
>
>> So, hopefully some more new imagery that we can use to update highway
>> projects will be showing up soon
>>
>
>   I haven't been able to use NAIP WMS links since the USGS scaled back on
> their online services.   Do they work for you?


The link that James gave points to USDA's NAIP server, which is quite a bit
faster than USGS's.

I'm interested in getting this data (all of NAIP at least) downloaded and
tiled/cached for OSM US. If anyone is interested in working with me on
this, let me know.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

2017-01-04 Thread Ryan Cooper 
Kentucky also has 2016 NAIP imagery available through the state's GIS
office:
http://kyraster.ky.gov/arcgis/rest/services/ImageServices/Ky_NAIP_2016_2FT/ImageServer
http://kyraster.ky.gov/arcgis/rest/services/ImageServices/Ky_NAIP_2016_60cm_WGS84WM/ImageServer




On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:58 PM, James Mast 
wrote:

> https://gis.apfo.usda.gov/arcgis/rest/services/NAIP
>
> Folder: NAIP 
> gis.apfo.usda.gov
> ArcGIS REST Services Directory Login: Home > services > NAIP: Help | API
> Reference: JSON | SOAP
>
> Just happened to check out the link (which I do every once in awhile) and
> noticed that two states that now finally have 2016 imagery online, which
> are Massachusetts & Tennessee.  The rest of states that have 2014 are
> also supposedly due 2016 refreshes as well (I know NC was on the list for
> sure).  So, hopefully some more new imagery that we can use to update
> highway projects will be showing up soon. [image: ]
>
>
> Have fun guys!! [image: ]
>
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>


-- 
Ryan Cooper
ryancooper...@gmail.com
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

2017-01-04 Thread James Mast 
I tested out the new 2016 TN link in JOSM before I sent the original email and 
it worked perfectly fine for me.


From: Mike N 
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 10:05:13 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts 
& Tennessee)

On 1/4/2017 9:58 PM, James Mast wrote:
> So, hopefully some more new imagery that we can use to update highway
> projects will be showing up soon

   I haven't been able to use NAIP WMS links since the USGS scaled back
on their online services.   Do they work for you?

Mike

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

2017-01-04 Thread Mike N 

On 1/4/2017 9:58 PM, James Mast wrote:

So, hopefully some more new imagery that we can use to update highway
projects will be showing up soon


  I haven't been able to use NAIP WMS links since the USGS scaled back 
on their online services.   Do they work for you?


   Mike

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

2017-01-04 Thread James Mast 
https://gis.apfo.usda.gov/arcgis/rest/services/NAIP

Folder: NAIP
gis.apfo.usda.gov
ArcGIS REST Services Directory Login: Home > services > NAIP: Help | API 
Reference: JSON | SOAP


Just happened to check out the link (which I do every once in awhile) and 
noticed that two states that now finally have 2016 imagery online, which are 
Massachusetts & Tennessee.  The rest of states that have 2014 are also 
supposedly due 2016 refreshes as well (I know NC was on the list for sure).  
So, hopefully some more new imagery that we can use to update highway projects 
will be showing up soon. []

Have fun guys!! []
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Relation roles: Clockwise and Counterclockwise route directions? (e.g. Pittsburgh's Belts)

2017-01-04 Thread Paul Johnson 
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Albert Pundt  wrote:

> I know that north/south/east/west directions are preferred for relation
> roles of one-way route segments (e.g. one-way pairs or divided highways),
> but what about clockwise and counterclockwise? Often beltways, like D.C.'s
> Capital Beltway, are signed such that they abruptly go from north/south to
> east/west, but then you have routes like Pittsburgh's Belt System, where
> the Belts aren't signed with directions at all. These seem to be given "CW"
> (clockwise) and "CCW" (counterclockwise) roles. Is this correct, or does
> "forward" or some other role need to be used?
>

Always use forward/backward as the role if the member is a way.  Always use
a cardinal or clockwise/anticlockwise for the role on a route master when
the members are relations.  Trying to use anything other than
forward/backward on ways makes routes an extraordinary pain in the butt if
not unmaintainable.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us