Re: [Talk-us] Functional Classification question in the Kansas City area

2017-09-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Max Erickson  wrote:

> Given that the HFCS can simply be added as another tag, I don't see
> any reason to force OSM tagging away from what is sensible just to
> line up with what the state says.
>

This.  If the HFCS is known, add that in a separate tag.  This can help
provide context with mappers not necessarily intimately familiar with the
area when trying to work out what to set an obviously wrong highway=* tag.
HFCS (or it's equivalents or analogues) are not the sole deciding factor
outside of the UK, where the highway=* tag is actually congruent by design.

I usually go by capacity potential, network and historical significance.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Functional Classification question in the Kansas City area

2017-09-23 Thread Max Erickson
Given that the HFCS can simply be added as another tag, I don't see
any reason to force OSM tagging away from what is sensible just to
line up with what the state says.

Max

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


[Talk-us] Functional Classification question in the Kansas City area

2017-09-23 Thread Joseph Barnes
Hello all, 

 

So for the past few months, user UAN51 (I've invited him to join this
thread) has been applying MODOT's Highway Functional Classification System
(HFCS) to primary and lower roads in the KCMO area. This has led to some
things (like part of US 169 and US 69 being secondary roads, MO 273 being a
secondary road when it's in just as good of condition as US 59 from 273 to
St. Joe) that just don't seem right to me. We have talked about this, and am
unable to agree. Now, I know I'm not the best person to deal with
classification issues (e.g. that time I overinterpreted the motorway tag and
applied it everywhere in the US because I didn't have anything better to
do), so I thought I'd ask for your opinion on this. Should we use solely
HFCS to determine the classification tag of primary and under roads?

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us