Re: [Talk-us] fake mapping

2020-06-08 Thread Evin Fairchild
Could you provide a link to the area you're referring to?

Thanks, Evin

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 3:27 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours
> by public transportation.
>
> the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the
> dam, which was not there in 1969
>
> when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were
> all marked unmaintained track road.
>
> there are pologons around the greens, holes and fairways not the whole
> property, where natural woods
>
> that have separate pologons.
>
> the point is there is to much there to fix.
>
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


[Talk-us] fake mapping

2020-06-08 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us

just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours by 
public transportation.
 
the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the dam, 
which was not there in 1969
 
when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were all 
marked unmaintained track road.
 
there are pologons around the greens, holes and fairways not the whole 
property, where natural woods
 
that have separate pologons.  
 
the point is there is to much there to fix.  
 
 ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] river - stream

2020-06-08 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us

YES !, i guess what i am saying i would like to see more drop down options.
  
>Monday, June 8, 2020 8:36 AM -05:00 from nwastra :
> 
>I am not very familiar with the iD editor but I notice that where a stream and 
>highway cross, what boxes and dropdowns are offered depends what you have 
>selected.
>If you have the stream selected you will be offered tunnel/culvert/layer/etc 
>as options.
>If you have the highway selected you will be offered bridge/tunnel/ford/etc.
> 
>Is this the reason you are not seeing the options you expect?
>
>On 8 Jun 2020, at 10:49 pm, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk < t...@openstreetmap.org 
>> wrote:
> 
>>>i guss what i am saying, add a tunnel is wrong, when the road is on the 
>>>bridge, and the drop down box
>> 
>>says culvert. again i am only seeing the ID map.
>>i just tried it, it only says add a tunnel, then river is under bridge. 
>>>Monday, June 8, 2020 7:00 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk < 
>>>t...@openstreetmap.org >:
>>> 
>>>Is there anything wrong with that?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>Jun 8, 2020, 13:57 by  t...@openstreetmap.org :
>in the ID editor, if you draw a stream - river  line, and it crosses a 
>road, you get a warning, with the suggestion
> 
>add a bridge or tunnel. 
> 
>>Monday, June 8, 2020 5:13 AM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer < 
>>dieterdre...@gmail.com >:
>> 
>>Am Sa., 6. Juni 2020 um 18:02 Uhr schrieb Dave F via talk < 
>>t...@openstreetmap.org >:
>>>Do you have an example?
>> 
>>A simple example for a tunnel (here subway) on a bridge would be this:
>>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757824513
>>https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pont_Morand
>> 
>>>Whether it's a bridge or tunnel is fairly easily defined by determining
>>>which is taking the load.
>>>If a tunnel's structure was removed, would whitewater's above it
>>>collapse? If 'yes' then it's a tunnel.
>> 
>>what I wrote was that - according to some technical definitions - a 
>>tunnel must not have something above it, it may be sufficient that it is 
>>closed and long enough. I am not sure if we share these definitions in 
>>OSM.
>>According to the current wiki, "a tunnel is an underground passage for a 
>>road or similar." and also: " tunnel =* is used for roads, railway line, 
>>canals etc that run underground (in  tunnel ). "  This doesn't appear to 
>>be exhaustive / complete, tunnels could also run underwater, above ground 
>>and potentially in the future even in space, no?
>>Many current underwater tunnels are also "underground", as they are often 
>>running in a man made structure (embankment like) on the ground or below 
>>the water body/river in the ground
>> 
>>Cheers
>>Martin
>>___
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] VANDALISM !

2020-06-08 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us

That is a good question, I answered him on what he sent me, that he was 
complaining about in the form of a threat,
 
as andy said,
 
I was trying fix the ghost issue on a 10 year old  National Hydrography 
Dataset, download that was one 81 mile
 
multipolygon that was not even his edit, I answered him with the wiki. rule, 
and he attacked all my that day’s 
 
river edits some i have been working on for a year, attacking other issues next 
to the river as well
 
things that have been all ready ? by others users.
  
>Sunday, June 7, 2020 11:59 PM -05:00 from Alessandro Sarretta 
>:
> 
>If this is the changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86230442 ), 
>where is the discussion?
>Ale
>On 07/06/20 17:33, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>>86230442
>>>Sunday, June 7, 2020 8:47 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk < 
>>>t...@openstreetmap.org >:
>>> 
>>>Provide a link to the changeset.
>>>
>>>DaveF
>___
>talk mailing list
>t...@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk 
 
 
 
 ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us