Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Edit Attacks

2020-06-10 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us
I am not a native speaker, but as far as I know "freak" is pejorative and quite 
strong 
slur.

If I am right and it has strong negative associations - please do not use it on 
mailing lists
or elsewhere in OSM.

Jun 10, 2020, 23:41 by talk-us@openstreetmap.org:

> this is a good one because i had a back and forth discussion with somebody 
> that was 
> calling me out on my edit because from space this looked like a flat surface 
> and then explaned
> how to list it as non active.
>  
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802256628#map=16/42.1110/-87.8160
>  
> but the thing is the river was a 10 year old 81 mile download that maye 
> should not be as to the Wiki.
> and this guy must be a river freak just like the bus stop guy who thought he 
> own the map.
>  
>
>> Wednesday, June 10, 2020 2:26 PM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk 
>> :
>>  
>> Can you link any specific changeset damaging data
>> or object that was deleted and should not be?
>>  
>> Linked ones
>> http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=86230442
>> http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=85357849
>> appear to not be problematic
>>  
>> ( >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/233949#map=9/41.8982/-87.7286
>> is on boundary of unreasonably large relation, but it is not
>> something very problematic)
>>  
>> Jun 10, 2020, 15:27 by talk-us@openstreetmap.org:
>>
>>>     Last week I edited a 10 year old, 81 mile>>>  MultiPolygon with GHOSTS 
>>> in the ID editor, all I know, Someone
>>>  
>>> took offence to that,  >>> 
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85357849#map=13/42.0813/-87.8854
>>>  
>>> and attacked all my edits of that day, and as he moved from north to south, 
>>> every thing I did for the
>>>  
>>> last year.   >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86230442>>>  , 
>>> with things other people had already
>>>  
>>> called me on, (discussion). so >>>  >>> exposing>>>  my self everything I 
>>> have done in the last 24 hours is under question
>>>  
>>> from people who are not local but in Europe. even my visit to the golf 
>>> course is in question a 7 year stale edit.
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>
>>  
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> t...@openstreetmap.org 
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>  
>  
>  
>  
>

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Edit Attacks

2020-06-10 Thread Andy Townsend

On 10/06/2020 22:41, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
this is a good one because i had a back and forth discussion with 
somebody that was
calling me out on my edit because from space this looked like a flat 
surface and then explaned

how to list it as non active.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802256628#map=16/42.1110/-87.8160



Well that's been a golf course for only a month:

http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=802256628

If that isn't a golf course, I suggest you discuss that with the person 
who added that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84983669 .



but the thing is the river was a 10 year old 81 mile download that 
maye should not be as to the Wiki.
and this guy must be a river freak just like the bus stop guy who 
thought he own the map.


As I suggested earlier, it'd definitely make sense to split up some of 
the huge "natural=water; water=river" areas such as 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/233949 , but anyone who does that 
will need to do it in such as way that it doesn't accidentally delete 
large lengths of riverbank (which happened last time).


Best Regards,

Andy



___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Edit Attacks

2020-06-10 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us

this is a good one because i had a back and forth discussion with somebody that 
was 
calling me out on my edit because from space this looked like a flat surface 
and then explaned
how to list it as non active.
 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802256628#map=16/42.1110/-87.8160
 
but the thing is the river was a 10 year old 81 mile download that maye should 
not be as to the Wiki.
and this guy must be a river freak just like the bus stop guy who thought he 
own the map.
  
>Wednesday, June 10, 2020 2:26 PM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk 
>:
> 
>Can you link any specific changeset damaging data
>or object that was deleted and should not be?
> 
>Linked ones
>http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=86230442
>http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=85357849
>appear to not be problematic
> 
>(  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/233949#map=9/41.8982/-87.7286
>is on boundary of unreasonably large relation, but it is not
>something very problematic)
> 
>Jun 10, 2020, 15:27 by talk-us@openstreetmap.org:
>>    Last week I edited a 10 year old, 81 mile  MultiPolygon with GHOSTS in 
>>the ID editor, all I know, Someone
>> 
>>took offence to that,   
>>https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85357849#map=13/42.0813/-87.8854
>> 
>>and attacked all my edits of that day, and as he moved from north to south, 
>>every thing I did for the
>> 
>>last year.    https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86230442  , with things 
>>other people had already
>> 
>>called me on, (discussion). so    exposing  my self everything I have done in 
>>the last 24 hours is under question
>> 
>>from people who are not local but in Europe. even my visit to the golf course 
>>is in question a 7 year stale edit.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>___
>talk mailing list
>t...@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
 
 
 
 ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Edit Attacks

2020-06-10 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us
Can you link any specific changeset damaging data
or object that was deleted and should not be?

Linked ones 
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=86230442
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=85357849
appear to not be problematic

( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/233949#map=9/41.8982/-87.7286 
is on boundary of unreasonably large relation, but it is not
something very problematic)
 
Jun 10, 2020, 15:27 by talk-us@openstreetmap.org:

>     Last week I edited a 10 year old, 81 mile>  MultiPolygon with GHOSTS in 
> the ID editor, all I know, Someone
>  
> took offence to that,  > 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85357849#map=13/42.0813/-87.8854
>  
> and attacked all my edits of that day, and as he moved from north to south, 
> every thing I did for the
>  
> last year.   > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86230442>  , with 
> things other people had already
>  
> called me on, (discussion). so >  > exposing>  my self everything I have done 
> in the last 24 hours is under question
>  
> from people who are not local but in Europe. even my visit to the golf course 
> is in question a 7 year stale edit.
>  
>  
>  
>

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Edit Attacks

2020-06-10 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us

    Last week I edited a 10 year old, 81 mile  MultiPolygon with GHOSTS in the 
ID editor, all I know, Someone 
 
took offence to that,   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85357849#map=13/42.0813/-87.8854
 
and attacked all my edits of that day, and as he moved from north to south, 
every thing I did for the
 
last year.    https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86230442  , with things 
other people had already
 
called me on, (discussion). so    exposing  my self everything I have done in 
the last 24 hours is under question
 
from people who are not local but in Europe. even my visit to the golf course 
is in question a 7 year stale edit.
 
 
 ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us