Re: [Talk-us] Mtb Route Relations

2020-08-04 Thread Nathan Hartley
 Following this thread.

I have the same question, after recently moving the names that folks had
added to the way (and bridge) segments, of a linear park spanning lower
Michigan, to the relations representing the trail segment. The entire trail
is known as " The Great Lake-to-Lake Trails" [image: relation]
 7962984
, whereas it has segments known by other
names. For instance, 22 miles are also known as the "Mike Levine Lakelands
Trail State Park" [image: relation]
 272564
. I felt this was the most accurate way to
map this trail. However, the temptation is strong to "map for the
renderer", after seeing the trail names disappear from the rendered map
.

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 6:55 PM Mike Thompson  wrote:

> Let's say you have a trail in the US National Forest that was specifically
> created for mountain biking. It has a name and a FS trail number. It is
> represented in OSM by three ways currently: before a bridge, the bridge,
> and after the bridge.
>
> Is this a good candidate for a route relation?
> Should name=* tag appear just on the relation, or on all of the member
> ways as well?
> Should ref=* tag appear just on the relation, or on all of the members as
> well?
>
> I am assuming that physical and legal access tags should only appear on
> the member ways, even if every member has the same value, right?
>
> Just don't want to break anything...
>
> Mike
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] State Open Data

2018-09-11 Thread Nathan Hartley
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Clifford Snow 
wrote:

> A few months back I made available Washington State Roads background layer
> available for use in JOSM and iD. (Shoutout to Mapbox for providing free
> hosting of this service.) I would like to add other states but need your
> help finding open data suitable for inclusion in OSM.
>


I have seen where many area specific Wiki pages will have a "potential
source of import data" section. Recently, I ran across a Wiki page that
attempted to catalog this type of information, for locations around the
world, in one place.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_Datasources


Here are two sites that I know about, which have also been added to the
Potential_Datasources page:

The State of Michigan
http://gis.midnr.opendata.arcgis.com/

North Country National Scenic Trail
https://gis-nct.opendata.arcgis.com/
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us