Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?
On 9/30/15 12:47 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote: > Wow. I have not gotten to the point, in my mapping adventures, where I > have had to look at changesets like this. A new thing to learn. > > Thanks for the reverts. I will get to fixing the rest of that soon. > > you may want to look to newer TIGER boundary data as it does change over time. 2014 City boundaries for California may be found here, already converted into useful forms: GeoJSON: https://github.com/boundaryissues/TIGER2014/blob/master/place/CA/tl_2014_06_place-25.geojson Shapefiles: https://github.com/boundaryissues/TIGER2014/blob/master/place/CA/tl_2014_06_place-25.zip richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:12:52 + (UTC) Minh Nguyen wrote: > Jack Burke writes: > > > > > You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I > > can find > the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. > AFAICT, it isn't a consolidated city-County, so it should exist. > > Looks like the original TIGER boundary way got deleted back in 2010, > and I can't find any traces of ways that superseded it: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4084221 > > As a first step, I undeleted that way using Potlatch 1: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33135846 > > Now it needs to be turned into a relation and integrated with the > adjacent boundary ways. > Wow. I have not gotten to the point, in my mapping adventures, where I have had to look at changesets like this. A new thing to learn. Thanks for the reverts. I will get to fixing the rest of that soon. thanx - ray ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?
I just like the surprise way in which the issue was resolved. Good work all around! -- SEJ -- twitter: @geomantic -- skype: sejohnson8 There are two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete data. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Jack Burke writes: > > > > > You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I can > find > the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. AFAICT, it > isn't a consolidated city-County, so it should exist. > > Looks like the original TIGER boundary way got deleted back in 2010, and I > can't find any traces of ways that superseded it: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4084221 > > As a first step, I undeleted that way using Potlatch 1: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33135846 > > Now it needs to be turned into a relation and integrated with the adjacent > boundary ways. > > -- > m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us > > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?
Jack Burke writes: > > You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I can find the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. AFAICT, it isn't a consolidated city-County, so it should exist. Looks like the original TIGER boundary way got deleted back in 2010, and I can't find any traces of ways that superseded it: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4084221 As a first step, I undeleted that way using Potlatch 1: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33135846 Now it needs to be turned into a relation and integrated with the adjacent boundary ways. -- m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?
You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I can find the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. AFAICT, it isn't a consolidated city-County, so it should exist. -jack On September 29, 2015 5:10:25 PM EDT, Ray Kiddy wrote: > >I have been fixing up boundaries of cities in California and I have >found something odd. > >Where is the city of Sacramento? > >There is a city there. There is a county. The county boundaries are at >http://openstreetmap.org/relation/396460 and that all looks good. And >it is not a county/city hybrid thing like San Francisco. Yes? And I can >find the cities of West Sacramento, Rancho Cordova and others nearby, >But I cannot find boundaries for the actual city of Sacramento. Google >has boundaries for it, but OSM does not? > >Or is there some way I should be finding it that I am not doing? I >guess it could be mis-spelled. > >I am going to the area around the county in >http://overpass-turbo.eu/ and doing this search: > >[out:json][timeout:360]; >( >relation["name"="Sacramento"]({{bbox}}); >way["name"="Sacramento"]({{bbox}}); >node["name"="Sacramento"]({{bbox}}); >); >out body; >>; >out skel qt; > >It finds lot of stuff, but no city. Any ideas? > >cheers - ray > > > >___ >Talk-us mailing list >Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- Typos courtesy of fancy auto-spell technology. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?
I have been fixing up boundaries of cities in California and I have found something odd. Where is the city of Sacramento? There is a city there. There is a county. The county boundaries are at http://openstreetmap.org/relation/396460 and that all looks good. And it is not a county/city hybrid thing like San Francisco. Yes? And I can find the cities of West Sacramento, Rancho Cordova and others nearby, But I cannot find boundaries for the actual city of Sacramento. Google has boundaries for it, but OSM does not? Or is there some way I should be finding it that I am not doing? I guess it could be mis-spelled. I am going to the area around the county in http://overpass-turbo.eu/ and doing this search: [out:json][timeout:360]; ( relation["name"="Sacramento"]({{bbox}}); way["name"="Sacramento"]({{bbox}}); node["name"="Sacramento"]({{bbox}}); ); out body; >; out skel qt; It finds lot of stuff, but no city. Any ideas? cheers - ray ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us