Re: [Talk-us] Desert wash that is also vehicle track or path?

[John Eldredge]

The two-relations approach would also handle any points where the roadway 
and stream diverge. For example, if the stream goes over falls, even falls 
only a meter high, vehicles will have to diverge onto the bank to go around 
the drop-off, not over it.


--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot 
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.




On October 28, 2015 6:33:23 PM Greg Troxel  wrote:


Tod Fitch  writes:


My inclination is to use one way but that gives an issue with the
name=* tag. In the case of the Cherry Wash Trail there is two names
(“Cherry Wash” and “Cherry Wash Trail”).

My thought is to use one way with the following tags:

highway=path
name=Cherry Wash Trail
alt_name=Cherry Wash
waterway=stream
intermittent=yes


Without thinking too much:

  one way for the feature

  a relation with one member for the trail
  a relation with one member for the stream

That seems cleaner and gets the names right.



--
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us




___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Desert wash that is also vehicle track or path?

[Tod Fitch]

I have worked with multipolygon relations and with route relations, but I am 
unfamiliar with a relation for a single stream or highway way. What type(s) 
would those relations be?

> On Oct 28, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Greg Troxel  wrote:
> 
> 
> Tod Fitch  writes:
> 
>> My inclination is to use one way but that gives an issue with the
>> name=* tag. In the case of the Cherry Wash Trail there is two names
>> (“Cherry Wash” and “Cherry Wash Trail”).
>> 
>> My thought is to use one way with the following tags:
>> 
>> highway=path
>> name=Cherry Wash Trail
>> alt_name=Cherry Wash
>> waterway=stream
>> intermittent=yes
> 
> Without thinking too much:
> 
>  one way for the feature
> 
>  a relation with one member for the trail
>  a relation with one member for the stream
> 
> That seems cleaner and gets the names right.
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us