Re: [Talk-us] Functional Classification question in the Kansas City area

2017-09-23 Thread Paul Johnson 
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Max Erickson  wrote:

> Given that the HFCS can simply be added as another tag, I don't see
> any reason to force OSM tagging away from what is sensible just to
> line up with what the state says.
>

This.  If the HFCS is known, add that in a separate tag.  This can help
provide context with mappers not necessarily intimately familiar with the
area when trying to work out what to set an obviously wrong highway=* tag.
HFCS (or it's equivalents or analogues) are not the sole deciding factor
outside of the UK, where the highway=* tag is actually congruent by design.

I usually go by capacity potential, network and historical significance.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Functional Classification question in the Kansas City area

2017-09-23 Thread Max Erickson 
Given that the HFCS can simply be added as another tag, I don't see
any reason to force OSM tagging away from what is sensible just to
line up with what the state says.

Max

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us