Re: Downloading Messages-feature request
On 30-07-2001 at 19:17:56 (GMT +0800) (which was 12:17 where I live) Thomas F wrote regarding the subject of Downloading Messages-feature request Using: The Bat! (v1.54 Beta/4) Personal Hello Thomas, TF If the message is bigger than xxx KB, download the header only, and TF *leave the message on server* regardless of the settings in the TF account properties. TF With this downloaded header, provide a button with which you can TF decide whether to a.) Downlaod the full message at next mail check, or TF b.) delete the message from server at next mailcheck. Now this would be nice and functional. You have my vote here! Regards -- Manfred ___ [ TheBat 1.53o (FE1905D5), Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 ] -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The Bat! - bug report
Hello SyP, On Monday, July 30, 2001 at 12:52:19 PM you wrote (at least in part): S so there must be other factors That's what my first though was too after I couldn't confirm your report. But I've absolutely no idea where to start :-( S FYI: quite != quiet Thx ... seems one can notice I'm not native english *GGG* -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) It is my firm belief that it is a mistake to hold firm beliefs. -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Subject)
-- Krzysztof Kudacik | PGPKeyID:0x6563B85A Corporate: http://www.psf.org.pl http://thebat.pl http://camera.art.pl The Bat! 1.54 Beta/4 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
html engine - 'show RFC-822 message headers' buglet
Hello List, I received a message with the following header Return-Path: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 17646 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2001 10:57:12 - Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.88) by morpheus.zone35.de with SMTP; 30 Jul 2001 10:57:12 - Received: from signum1226.demon.co.uk ([158.152.123.80] helo=signumserver.1226.net) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15RAjX-000N6j-0U for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:57:12 +0100 Received: by SIGNUMSERVER with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id P0YV0Q2L; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:00:49 +0100 Message-ID: 413E362AE782D511991300C0F02A096134BC@SIGNUMSERVER From: System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undeliverable: Re: tcpserver Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:00:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) X-MS-Embedded-Report: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_=_NextPart_000_01C119B0.0E839A10 when in RTF-viewer and using Shift+Ctrl+K for viewing headers it looks like this: ... Received: by SIGNUMSERVER with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id P0YV0Q2L; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:00:49 +0100 ON ONE LINE Message-ID: 413E362AE782D511991300C0F02A096134BC@SIGNUMSERVER From: System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] /ON ONE LINE To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... If I export the message, move the Messgae-ID line somewhere else everything is shown normal, only if _THIS_ message id line is directly before From there's the buglet. This does not happen when viewing with PTV, only new RTF viewer I've checked the source in a HEX viewer and there's nothing unusual before 'From:' ... normal '0x0D0A' line termination, like every other line too. To become more strange: I've received a similar mail some days ago, from the same server, only differences are Date, Message-ID and of course Subject and Received lines. Everything is shown normal. Has anybody a hint/idea what to check for, what to alter to find out _what_ causes this behavior? If something 's still unclear from my description write me, I'll make a screenshot and put it online. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) My powers are beyond your understanding! -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin-request: unsubscribe user
Hello List-Admins, could one of the admins please be so kind and unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] I received meanwhile two mails from him to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no subject. First mail was from Sun, 29 Jul 2001 20:54:04 +0200 second Mon, 30 Jul 2001 14:23:05 +0200 Seems automatic unsubscription does not work :-(/ Thx Pit -- Regards Peter Palmreuther mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) I may have my faults, but being wrong isn't one of them. -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Downloading Messages-feature request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Monday, July 30, 2001, 1:46:51 PM, -=/ Cees /=- wrote: Duh... how about a firewall and anti virusscanner? Duh! How'bout understanding my request. I'm not infected with it and I run ZoneAlarm but downloading tons of infected mail isn't my cup of tea. - -- Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner! __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team iQA/AwUBO2VQrvFgRjY97rftEQKiRACglXpgKfARXoDiMoCPzVloMBsTm7QAoJr1 PPfM0y6A4MfIk2WRtK9da+vf =18k/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Downloading Messages-feature request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Monday, July 30, 2001, 2:17:56 PM, Thomas F wrote: If the message is bigger than xxx KB, download the header only, and *leave the message on server* regardless of the settings in the account properties. With this downloaded header, provide a button with which you can decide whether to a.) Downlaod the full message at next mail check, or b.) delete the message from server at next mailcheck. Hey, I'm not picky :) If this feature will be included, I don't really care for it's incarnation as long as it is there ;) - -- Capital punishment means never having to say YOU AGAIN? __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team iQA/AwUBO2VRf/FgRjY97rftEQJbtQCgicEY9zCAoAcAJ1lr/g10qzJruZEAoNl3 cO68cJFxWzgaswo0DkkQN2fS =pPxT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (No Subject)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Monday, July 30, 2001, 3:23:05 PM, Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote: Krzystof, no offence, but why do you keep sending these empty mails ? - -- Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional. - --Mad Scientist __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team iQA/AwUBO2V5R/FgRjY97rftEQLYHACg2IyUYCl7Qd/SCwL18D0WlNbE/EIAoO2S R3ILPZIegAs/dHkZaNBeBhDI =+7aJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with pgp-signature MIME-Section
Hello All, When I read my messages of the Linux Kernel Mailing List (LKML) I sometimes see a message in the preview window with an attachment named message.att. Opening the attachment shows that this attachment is the pgp-signature part (see below). ===Quoting the message Received: from vger.kernel.org by mx03.web.de with smtp [... stripped to relevant parts] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:25:33PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: =20 KERN_BANNER cool, what about kbannerd ? --=20 John Lenton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Random fortune: A longo prazo, estaremos todos mortos. -- John Maynard Keynes=20 --7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7O6IAgPqu395ykGsRAnoaAKCktfnIoy1oiEW8HUX9HqmHgzq19ACeMvQn dnaK/Glfc6zx6n01btkGFmw= =tZkE -END PGP SIGNATURE- --7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ===Quoting the message Question: Is the section boundary/description Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T Content-Disposition: inline standard ? If this Question is answered Yes then TheBat shouldn't show the signature section as attachment or it should show the signature inline at the end of the message. In addition to that TheBat should mark this message as PGP-signed and offer the reader to check the signature for validity (against the key-ring). -- Bye Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with pgp-signature MIME-Section
Hello Thomas, On Sunday, July 29, 2001 at 7:27:49 PM you wrote (at least in part): TS Is the section boundary/description Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=7LkOrbQMr4cezO2T Content-Disposition: inline TS standard ? it is. TS If this Question is answered Yes then TheBat shouldn't show the TS signature section as attachment or it should show the signature TS inline at the end of the message. Nope, it shouldn't! TS In addition to that TheBat should mark this message as PGP-signed and TS offer the reader to check the signature for validity (against the TS key-ring). Nope, it can't (yet). What mutt does is PGP/MIME and that's slightly different from what TB! does for signing messages. TB! is (yet) not able to encrypt/sign PGP/MIME or decrypt/verify PGP/MIME. TB! should _not_ show the signature inline because: you can save the message as text file without attachement, save the attachment and decrypt/verify by PGP directly. Showing the signature inline would it make quite impossible to save the message correctly. Nevertheless showing the signature inline does not make _any_ sense as you are not able to do something useful with this signature in that state, because verifying from within TB! is impossible. As I not yet received such a message could you answer me one question: offers TB! the possibility to see the attachment as text (register card below the message preview pane)? This could be a quite interesting function as it prevents me from saving the attachment, opening it in my gvim just for recognizing it 'not interesting text'. CYa Pit -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) LSD melts in your mind, not in your hands. -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Kill dupes function doesn't works
Hello all, Monday, July 30, 2001, Peter Palmreuther wrote: PP Hello Marek, PP On Monday, July 30, 2001 at 11:51:54 AM you wrote (at least in part): MM I will sent You example messages from home. PP Thx ... will do some testings than :-) here they are. -- Bye Marek Mikus Using the best The Bat! 1.54 Beta/4 under the worst Windows 98 4.10 Build A AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 256 MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:19:24 +0100 Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How come Opera and others call theirs ECMAscript? This is a European standard which was supposed to resolve the incompatibility of various implementations of JavaScript, unfortunately it doesn't. Many sites are still coded for Netscape 4.7x which is the most non-compliant browser, these sites have another set of code to make them work with IE. Opera won't work with either implementation, and the only browser which is fully compliant (NS6) nobody uses What a mess! -- Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com http://www.gunfleet.com/linux_links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~ Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends! http://us.click.yahoo.com/l3joGB/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/CxaWlB/TM -_- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:19:24 +0100 Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How come Opera and others call theirs ECMAscript? This is a European standard which was supposed to resolve the incompatibility of various implementations of JavaScript, unfortunately it doesn't. Many sites are still coded for Netscape 4.7x which is the most non-compliant browser, these sites have another set of code to make them work with IE. Opera won't work with either implementation, and the only browser which is fully compliant (NS6) nobody uses What a mess! -- Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com http://www.gunfleet.com/linux_links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-~ Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends! http://us.click.yahoo.com/l3joGB/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/CxaWlB/TM -_- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
