Re[4]: TheBat! Pro
Greetings Joseph, Sunday, June 23, 2002, 12:12:07 PM, you wrote: JN> What does that mean? How are they different? Unless I'm mistaken, he means that the software is using Russian standard encryption Algorithms vice something like RSA, PGP or one of the US Government algorithms or algorithms contolled by the US (RSA, DES, etc). The US does the same thing by denying an export license to products containing a crypto system with more than an X bit encryption key. As I recall for a long time that was 64 bits, but it may have been less, and I don't know the current status of such Export laws. I think it may have been OBE because of strong easily available European encryption systems (among others). As I recall the US Government tried to make a case that Encryption was effectively military hardware in the context of export laws. Of course my knowledge of Crypto systems and export licenses and whatnot is somewhat out of date, and I could be TOTALLY wrong . -- Best regards, Scott Forget Outlook Express, I use The Bat! 1.60c On an Abit KT7-RAID with a Thunderbird 900, and 512Megs of RAM. Burdened by: Windows XP Home (V 5.1.2600) _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[3]: TheBat! Pro
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, Alexander Leschinsky wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AL> Russian crypto-standards Alexander, What does that mean? How are they different? -- JN _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: TheBat! Pro
Hello tracer, On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:17:29 +0700 (23.06.02 13:17 my local time) you wrote about "TheBat! Pro", at least in part: t> More secure??? or less... Simply different, more universal,less expensive t> And why the export restriction?? Why not?! Russian crypto-standards was used in it -- Best regards, Alexander Leschinsky Powered by The Bat! 1.60q Weakened by Windows 98 4.10. A - MOTD: Let us make a special effort to stop communicating with each other, so we can have some conversation. Judith Martin, (Miss Manners) _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
"User-Agent" vs. "X-Mailer"
Hello list I got today a message where the MUA wasn't indicated with "X-Mailer" but User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011126 Netscape6/6.2.1 Is this a new definition? Seems TheBat! can handle it very good - thanks a lot. -- Best regards, Martin Schochmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Bug: SMTP dialog
Hello Allie C Martin, On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 06:42:39 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, June 15, 2002, 6:42:39 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Allie C Martin wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Martin Schoch [MS] wrote: JP>>> So there is no bug. If you prefer to have a hostname in there JP>>> (why would you want to?!), then set it in the right properties, JP>>> namely the TCP/IP properties. MS>> Can you say me exactly where. > I think this is what they're referring to: > In Win95, you can go into the network properties and then bring up the > properties for tcp/ip->dialup adapter. Go to the DNS tab and enable > DNS. Put the host name as the machine name and put in your ISP DNS > server addresses. Done. > In Win2k, things don't seem to be as straight-forward. I don't see a > place to enter a host name. Sorry for adding one more message to this dead horse... Under Xp, and I havent got a 2000 system handy its under the tcp/ip network protocols of the dialup adapter. However if you mess around with it the wrong way the result can easily be no internet... Now forgetting the original subject as its more a matter of opinion whats best, there is a very good reason to use IP numbers where ever you can and where they arent changing. Many times I have had problems that some nameserver gets confused and if one specifies one's smtp and pop with the correct IP numbers instead of using some auto setting, one will find, as mentioned, increased speed as the nameserver doesnt have to be accessed to find the mail server. I have been in situations where the only way to get mail to / from my customers was to use known ip addresses. And, while for convenience I may not specify them in customers systems, the ones I likely will need are sitting on a printout above my desk. Secondly from a security point of view the less user specified data is passed on the better... Why does one want people to know that its a specific person using a DELL -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.60q mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] C.C.S. Associates FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753 pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: TheBat! Pro
Hello Alexander Leschinsky, On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:45:28 +0600 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, June 23, 2002, 6:45:28 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Alexander Leschinsky wrote: > Hello tracer, >On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:25:32 +0700 (23.06.02 04:25 my local time) >you wrote about "TheBat! Pro", >at least in part: t>> Seems very similar to the secure bat unless I miss something... > Different hardware-token used More secure??? or less... I myself am not that fond of the manufacturer of the token as used on secure bat but can obviously not comment on whats used in the Pro version... And why the export restriction?? -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.60q mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] C.C.S. Associates FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753 pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
