Re: Does imported messages sometimes loose the last characters?
On Monday, November 15, 2004, 23:47, Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote: In my opinion, lines of text creating message body should end with CRLF pairs. The Bat! probably takes into account each two last characters of each line and assumes that they are CRLF. However, in last line it is not true, because in this specific message it ends with 'ME'. Such strict behaviour is not needed here, because The Bat! should test the last character pair either before displaying or converting. So, this is a bug :-( Thanks for answering, both to you Zygmunt and to Mark Partous. I've filed a bug report at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4059 -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
double-byte editing is broken since 3.0.2.x?
i've reported bug but it doesn't seem to get any attention. hope some ritlab guys in this forum can see it. since 3.0.2.x (the first one i tried and confirmed this problem is 3.0.2.2), chinese editing is broken in windows editor mode: - now backspace can only delete a half of a chinese character (3.0.1.33 deletes the entire char, which is good) - now the line wrapping for chinese is wrong. 3.0.2.x wraps chinese as if it were english (wrap at spaces), however this doesn't work for chinese. 3.0.1.33 does the chinese wrap very well (wrap by characters). it seems that there is some significant changes in windows editor since 3.0.2.x which caused this significant change. is any ritlab guy aware of this? i tried 3.0.2.7 just now and it is still broken. fyi here is the bug i reported (id 3991): https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3991 any attention is appreciated. -- Samson, using Agent newsreader Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Does imported messages sometimes loose the last characters?
Hallo Marcus, On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:09:39 +0100GMT (15-11-2004, 23:09 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MO This actually was how the message did look like from the beginning, it MO was me removing the trailing CR/LF before importing it. Now, before I MO open up a bug report, is this a bug, or are there some RFC(s) specifying MO a message *should* end with CR/LF? I guess it might stand to reason that all messages end with CR/LF, because during the smtp protocol everything sent to the server after the DATA command has been issued is considered as the message until a dot on a separate line is encountered. In order to get that dot on a separate line, the last line of the message should end with CR/LF -- Groetjes, Roelof Veni, Vidi, VCR - I came, I saw, I videotaped it The Bat! 3.0.2.7 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgpxP54OTIKHT.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Does imported messages sometimes loose the last characters?
On Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 10:38, Roelof Otten wrote: I guess it might stand to reason that all messages end with CR/LF, because during the smtp protocol everything sent to the server after the DATA command has been issued is considered as the message until a dot on a separate line is encountered. In order to get that dot on a separate line, the last line of the message should end with CR/LF Sounds reasonable. If the only way to end up with a truncated message is to do as I did, import a erroneous message, then maybe we should not bother with this anymore. I would appreciate if you added this to the BT item I referred to earlier. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Does imported messages sometimes loose the last characters?
Hallo Marcus, On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:47:16 +0100GMT (16-11-2004, 10:47 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MO I would appreciate if you added this to the BT item I referred to MO earlier. Done. -- Groetjes, Roelof To err is human. Obviously, humans have bugs in the source code. - SLR The Bat! 3.0.2.7 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgp68ZJUDnfJB.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: MicroEd as standalone?
On Thursday, November 11, 2004, 09:31, Marcus Ohlström wrote: Are there any possibility MicroEd will ever be released as a standalone editor? I often find myself opening up a new message just to use MicroEd to format or compile text. I would love having MicroEd as my default editor, but as long as there is no standalone version... Still no words from Ritlabs.. I filed a wish, please add your notes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4060 -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re:Cookies in The Bat! Pro with OTF
G'day Stuart,
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, at 13:27:41 [GMT +] (00:27 here) you wrote:
Z Is this meant to happen?
It's not happening here. My cookie file is in
D:\Program Files\TheBat!\MailPwd and as you can see below all is
well.
Is it linked to SmartBat?
--
znark
:flag-australia:
The Bat! 3.0.2.7Windows XP - Service Pack 2, Build 2600
Hotmail Popper 2.1.1POPFile 0.22.1 PGP 8.1 \ GPG 1.2.5
þÉt.
F¸4²á(âØÓ¥I=\.û¼z=Ã+!àG\8?ùÿ#/ê¨ba¥%MøÛ+¨ß*·y# âqªÖ{ ±;Ú¶ËSìe`U0Tæ»å_дwUpæç
êÄú)`¬trCÇÿ¬ñ¡éN*1é5XæX½Ì`+\¶²vé¢kÔc{YñÀ%©È¾D3x£-$5ýÚ`ª¯ÊM´cÁlí/XÁ\Yÿ²D¶Ï)×V»=êZ+UÑ Yô¸d¶/
Ó
([EMAIL PROTECTED] Ü^
UðMATò·+ ^ %wóÙD£Å 85*®r/ü¨6ØãÁº³ØfpOðYö1æ
Mkåcs.â.='N\æa Å6E ],_¡ TàWK
üHs^·xÕ~h6Úh¬½¢9ONÑûnT\à¼û¨ÉRy´H¿{ªïü·Îît¼o'ïØùK¦ÕC¤»5¦¬]èvÑr»8¶î'2K´FVqÎ-\#©ÖÁ .×
Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Cookies in The Bat! Pro with OTF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Z Is it linked to SmartBat? Yes, although I never edit it in smartbat. However, I can see your problem in that I have 2 other files that are only accessed (very occasionally) from smartbat and they both contain garbage.! - -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.3, MyGate (v1.0) and rss2pop3 (v1.2). PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com If practice makes perfect, and nobody's perfect, why practice? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0 Comment: Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com; iQA/AwUBQZngr9ttnLhkydF1EQLu2QCg28U6++3RBTvREedfyLyWtPFwcPAAn2Nr 3MarWfxGrb9ObwLva+E6jex9 =X009 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re:Cookies in The Bat! Pro with OTF
G'day Stuart, On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, at 11:12:29 [GMT +] (22:12 here) you wrote: Z Is it linked to SmartBat? Yes, although I never edit it in smartbat. However, I can see your problem in that I have 2 other files that are only accessed (very occasionally) from smartbat and they both contain garbage.! So is this a bug? Is The Bat! trying to encrypt all the text files attached to smartbat as well? -- znark :flag-australia: The Bat! 3.0.2.7Windows XP - Service Pack 2, Build 2600 Hotmail Popper 2.1.1POPFile 0.22.1 PGP 8.1 \ GPG 1.2.5 ¡±§Æa:DtýM´OajØ7ì»uöÞZÎ%k÷è#ëSo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re:Cookies in The Bat! Pro with OTF
G'day znark, On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, at 20:52:55 [GMT +1100] (20:52 here) you wrote: G'day TBBETA, Notice my tag line which is obtained from a text file in the root of the mail base directory. The file is linked to SmartBat so I can add extra cookies. Is this meant to happen? I also noticed that other text files linked to SmartBat are corrupted(\encrypted) the same except for the default smartbat.txt file which I notice has been converted to smartbat.eni (I think) should be .ext I changed the file extension of the encrypted text files to .ext closed the pad (text file) in smartbat and reopened it with the new file extension. The files are readable. However my cookie file (cookie.ext - encrypted text file) cannot be read from by the template it still produced garbage (After I changed the reply\new message template to reflect the file extension change) So it appears that the cookie file has to be plain text and not encrypted text even though the encrypted text file can be read by smartbat. -- znark :flag-australia: The Bat! 3.0.2.7Windows XP - Service Pack 2, Build 2600 Hotmail Popper 2.1.1POPFile 0.22.1 PGP 8.1 \ GPG 1.2.5 They told me I was gullible ... and I believed them! Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Cookies in The Bat! Pro with OTF
Hello all, Tuesday, November 16, 2004, znark wrote: So is this a bug? Is The Bat! trying to encrypt all the text files attached to smartbat as well? all files with SmartBat files included are encrypted and this is not a bug. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.0.2.7 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
two ISO tables
Hello Tbbeta, Does anybody have (could create) the two XLT tables for The Bat! ISO-8859-13 ISO-8859-16 If yes, could you please post them to http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=149 !? Thank you very much in advance! -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Test message
Hello Stuart! On Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 1:53:22 PM you wrote: AM Just a test. Ignore if you can. :) Tried. Couldn't. 8-) I could, I could. :bounce-cheshire: -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.2.7 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am. (Derek Leveret) Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
BayesIt! strikes back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This morning I found the computer I run TB! showing a pop-up with the following text: counter error in nspamdict, with a OK button. Ah well. I knew Alexey is still working out the bugs. So I decided to look up the bayesit.log. Last entry is on Nov 14th: 14.11.2004 19:59:12 Current recalculation session is interrupted.. Now, I do remember that I closed TB! two days ago at about 21:00. I am also very sure I restarted it yesterday at about 19:00. But, going on. There's a 'BayesIt1' folder, same level as my original 'BayesIt', with some files, and dated Nov 16th. All files under it, including the temp working folders are timestamped at about 03:45 Nov 16. Except... '.\BayesIt1\Base\Transact\autotrain.bys' is timestamped 07:18 this morning. So. 1. The BayesIt! log has not been updated since Nov 14th;2. There's a new 'BayesIt1' folder, out of the blue; 3. BayesIt! got (it seems) utterly lost. This is BayesIt! 0.74. I do not remember any new official version from Alexey -- is there one? - -- ..hggdh.. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.6 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: public key at pgp.mit.edu iD8DBQFBmgpPVFMjkob7xf8RAqBwAKCzb3hf2LiwX81AMI0WX7gYdd+XGACgnpMr dFCWL4eEKxe4oGNPPMMNe2w= =3087 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: BayesIt! strikes back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A bit more of info -- I looked up the BayesIt! configuration. I was magiacally changed to NO logging, and the directory was indeed set to BayesIt1. I do not mind auto-configuring software, but I really do expect it to at least notify me that it decided to change my settings. I am not very happy, right now. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: public key at pgp.mit.edu iD8DBQFBmg91VFMjkob7xf8RAh+VAJ9+xQyVjOFKVhdJIc/0HgLhYBG27ACffhwv a0BBAjcfyuL116eq67u+Ipk= =JmBi -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: BayesIt! strikes back
Hello, hggdh. You wrote 16.11.2004 @ 22:32 in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] using mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.2.6) Professional h A bit more of info -- I looked up the BayesIt! configuration. I was h magiacally changed to NO logging, and the directory was indeed set to h BayesIt1. h I do not mind auto-configuring software, but I really do expect it to h at least notify me that it decided to change my settings. hm... Believe me, there is no such code in the BayesIt! It makes it's configuration during the first run by determining the working folder of The Bat! (the value of [HKCU\Software\Rit\Thebat!\Working Directory] plus bayesit). It never tries to make the folders like bayesit1 or likely. The ways it MAY be changed is a) manually do the configuration. b) manually edit tbplugin.ini in The Bat! working folder (however, this file contains plugin's settings being BASE64-encoded, and so, it is quite difficult to edit it really manually); c) restoring from backup copy where bayesit's settings were in bayesit1 and logging was switched off. If nothing from enumerated happens, it is really magic :) -- Sincerely, Alexey. Using TB 3.0.2.3 Rush on WinXP Pro SP2 (2600), spelling by ORFO2002 (CSAPI) ..with Kaspersky Antivirus Plugin (ver 3.5 Gold) antispam filter BayesIt! 0.7.5 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: two ISO tables
On Tuesday, November 16, 2004, at 14:46:50 [UTC+0200] (Tuesday, November 16, 2004 13:46 my local time) Maxim Masiutin wrote: Does anybody have (could create) the two XLT tables for The Bat! ISO-8859-13 ISO-8859-16 Are the data given at http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/ISO%208859-16 and http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/ISO%208859-13 enough for you? -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 with BayesIt! 0.7.4) Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: two ISO tables
Hello Maxim, On Tuesday, November 16, 2004, at 14:46, you wrote: MM Does anybody have (could create) the two XLT tables for The Bat! MM ISO-8859-13 MM ISO-8859-16 Are you going to include these ISO charsets into installation package? -- Edvinas Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 with on Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: double-byte editing is broken since 3.0.2.x?
Hello Samson, Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 4:51:55 PM, you wrote: S i've reported bug but it doesn't seem to get any attention. hope some S ritlab guys in this forum can see it. S since 3.0.2.x (the first one i tried and confirmed this problem is S 3.0.2.2), chinese editing is broken in windows editor mode: snip S i tried 3.0.2.7 just now and it is still broken. S fyi here is the bug i reported (id 3991): S https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3991 S any attention is appreciated. This bug, a definite bug of DBCS support, is quit a annoying for far east users. Did developers have any plan to improve this issue? also unicode support, a long wish? -- Best regards, drifthatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Translator of Chinese The Bat! Using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 Windows 2000 Advanced Server (v5.0.2195, Service Pack 4) Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: BayesIt! strikes back
Hello Alexey, Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 09:01:32, you wrote: ANV hm... Believe me, there is no such code in the BayesIt! It makes ANV it's configuration during the first run by determining the ANV working folder of The Bat! (the value of ANV [HKCU\Software\Rit\Thebat!\Working Directory] plus bayesit). It ANV never tries to make the folders like bayesit1 or likely. The ANV ways it MAY be changed is a) manually do the configuration. b) ANV manually edit tbplugin.ini in The Bat! working folder (however, ANV this file contains plugin's settings being BASE64-encoded, and ANV so, it is quite difficult to edit it really manually); c) ANV restoring from backup copy where bayesit's settings were in ANV bayesit1 and logging was switched off. ANV If nothing from enumerated happens, it is really magic :) Welcome to the Brave New World, that has such magic in it :-) (Shakespeare, please forgive me) a) manually do the configuration: no I did not do it. Since this system is only accessible by myself, I can also guarantee nobody did it. b) manually edit tbplugin.ini: also negative (even thou it is not that difficult to work with base64-encoded files). c) restoring from backup: no. No backups have been taken, so no backups could have been restored. Still... it changed to .\BayesIt1, and it reset logging. The last update on TB! was when I installed TB! 3.0.2.6 on Nov 8th. Whatever happened, happened between Nov 14th and Nov 16th (when I found it). I do not doubt you at all. I am just stating what happened. -- ..hggdh.. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.6 and BayesIt! 0.7.4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 pgpGg62DsadjJ.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Just another test
Hi there! test.. -- Origin: Russia, St.-Petersburg Powered by: The Bat! 3.0.0.15, Useless Macro Collection 2.0.1016 rc1 ICQ: 243063337 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Just another test
Hello Stanislav, Hi there, icles -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 16/11/2004 at 16:50 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Windows XP 5. 1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: test gmail retr
Paul Van Noord wrote: When will The Bat! be able to use a SSL server?? TB! is able to do POP or IMAP over SSL. It has been capable for a while. -- Cheers, -= Allie Martin =- I think not, said Descartes, and promptly disappeared. IMAP Clients: The Bat! v3.0.2.5 | ThunderBird v0.9 IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
