Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-20 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Me,

Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 9:25:37 AM, you wrote:

MP> Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 4:00:15 PM, you wrote:

CW>> Or has there been a none reversable change in
CW>> message base formats?

MP> Not that I'am aware of. Anyone else?

See what you get from threading by reference? You don't see that the question
has already been answered, that is: you only see it after your have posted
your message.  :-)


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 3.0.2.10 
MyMacros 1.11
Useless Macro Collection 1.8.845 beta
zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 
Zombies 0.7
Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 (0 days 1:31:48) on
Uno AMD Duron





 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-20 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Chris,

Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 4:00:15 PM, you wrote:

CW> Or has there been a none reversable change in
CW> message base formats?

Not that I'am aware of. Anyone else?

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 3.0.2.10 
MyMacros 1.11
Useless Macro Collection 1.8.845 beta
zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 
Zombies 0.7
Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 (0 days 1:16:25) on
Uno AMD Duron





 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Chris Wilson
Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 8:52:27 PM, you wrote:


> Hi Chris Wilson,

> Tuesday, April 19, 2005 
> you let us know -at least in parts- :


>>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb30210.rar

>> It's still there, I will be downloading it later. Many thanks. I'll keep
>> a few earlier stable releases from now on!

> Have you given up the new version? Thought it was running finally your
> place, too.

I need to switch between early stable version with accurate and reliable
spell checker and reference only threading for work, and the alpha /
betas for fun at home. I am now able to do this, thanks in the main, to
you :) I have no problem with bizarre behaviour from the new versions,
but it was impacting on work, so I needed to be able to switch around.





-- 
Best regards,
 Chris Wilson   
   The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build Number 
2195 Service Pack 4



 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello MAU,

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 you wrote in 

M> No, because it is not really a bug. RIT guys do read this list, so you
M> have already added your 2 cents

and so have I already but I might as well do it again just to make
the point because it really is quite infuriating having to find a
message miles back that just happens to be threaded to a very old thread
with the same subject.

-- 
Regards, Richard

| The Bat! 3.0.9.17 Return & SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Kerio 4.20.B5 and no Plug-ins

http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html




 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread The Final Cut
Hello MAU

On Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 3:51:23 PM +0400 GMT
You wrote:

M> No, because it is not really a bug. RIT guys do read this list, so you
M> have already added your 2 cents :)

perfect! :)


-- 
The Final Cut
  TheBat 3.0.2.10
  http://finalcut.ca/finalcut.asc
 

pgpeWsfmmd07u.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread MAU
Hello The,

> Is there a buglist filled about that so I can put a vote or something.  I want
> to add my 2 cent

No, because it is not really a bug. RIT guys do read this list, so you
have already added your 2 cents :)

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4






 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Chris Wilson,

Tuesday, April 19, 2005 
you let us know -at least in parts- :


>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb30210.rar

> It's still there, I will be downloading it later. Many thanks. I'll keep
> a few earlier stable releases from now on!

Have you given up the new version? Thought it was running finally your
place, too.



-- 
kind regards
Charlene Ferrara
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:star:

Using The Bat! v3.0.9.17 Return on 
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Using VF, no macros, no virus scan.






 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Tim Casten
Hello MAU,

Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 10:41:08 AM, you wrote:

> No problem at all if you revert to 3.0.2.10, I do it several times a day
> some times. You will see your messages properly threaded by Reference.


10 is the only one that is semi-stable for me!


-- 
Best regards,
 Tim



 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread The Final Cut
Hello MAU

On Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 7:04:28 AM +0400 GMT
You wrote:

M> Hello all,

M> After deleting my existing tbuser.def and a couple of tweaks I find the
M> last beta, v3.0.9.17 quite stable and would certainly like to use it all
M> day long for my work, which is the way I like to test betas.

M> However, quite unfortunately and as I think I have explained before in
M> this list, the threading by Reference+Subject which was introduced with
M> this beta series is a "no-no" for me and that forces me to revert all
M> the way to 3.0.2.10.

M> I know RIT guys intend to re-instate the possibility of threading by
M> Reference _only_ (and hopefully allowing also Reference+Subject to
M> satisfy everyone) and I can understand that this is not a high priority
M> at this time for most users and therefore for RIT. But it does "force"
M> me to use 3.0.2.10 during my works hours and I am sorry about it.

Same goes for me.  Some mailing list that I am subscribed just dont sort 
correctly.
Is there a buglist filled about that so I can put a vote or something.  I want 
to add my 2 cent

thanks
-- 
The Final Cut
  TheBat 3.0.2.10
  http://finalcut.ca/finalcut.asc
 

pgpp6A3ZAKxCd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Chris Wilson
Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 7:40:02 PM, you wrote:


> Hello Chris,

> Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 8:24:49 PM, among other things, you wrote:


CW>> Thanks for that, now I have found I have deleted 3.0.2.10. Is it on the
CW>> Ritlabs site? I haven't got web access until tomorrow. Cheers.

> I don't know if it is still available, but the original URL was:

> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb30210.rar



It's still there, I will be downloading it later. Many thanks. I'll keep
a few earlier stable releases from now on!


-- 
Best regards,
 Chris Wilson   
   The Bat 3.0.9.17 Return on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 
Number 2195 Service Pack 4



 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Chris,

Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 8:24:49 PM, among other things, you wrote:


CW> Thanks for that, now I have found I have deleted 3.0.2.10. Is it on the
CW> Ritlabs site? I haven't got web access until tomorrow. Cheers.

I don't know if it is still available, but the original URL was:

http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb30210.rar


-- 
Best regards,
 Roger  

Flying with The Bat!, version 3.0.9.17 Return, with antispam BayesIt! 0.8.0 
Release,
on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2   
   



 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Chris Wilson
Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 3:41:08 PM, you wrote:


> Hello Chris,

>> I have a question, if I were to revert to 3.0.2.10 myself would the
>> current message bases then be automatically re-threadable to their earlier
>> reference only formats? Or has there been a none reversable change in
>> message base formats?

> No problem at all if you revert to 3.0.2.10, I do it several times a day
> some times. You will see your messages properly threaded by Reference.


Thanks for that, now I have found I have deleted 3.0.2.10. Is it on the
Ritlabs site? I haven't got web access until tomorrow. Cheers.


-- 
Best regards,
 Chris Wilson   
   The Bat 3.0.9.17 Return on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 
Number 2195 Service Pack 4



 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread MAU
Hello Alexander,

> Thats still not fixed? What a shame, you reported it already a month ago,
> and this is REALLY a show-stopper.

It doesn't need to be fixed as it is not a bug, it was  a change
requested by (apparently) many users. 9Val told me it will be changed
again, probably to include both options: threading by Reference only and
by Reference+Subject. It just has low priority at the moment.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4






 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello MAU & everyone else,

on 19-Apr-2005 at 13:04 you (MAU) wrote:

> However, quite unfortunately and as I think I have explained before in
> this list, the threading by Reference+Subject which was introduced with
> this beta series is a "no-no" for me and that forces me to revert all
> the way to 3.0.2.10.

Thats still not fixed? What a shame, you reported it already a month ago,
and this is REALLY a show-stopper.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

Murphy's Corollary: It is impossible to make anything foolproof
because fools are so ingenious.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread MAU
Hello Chris,

> I have a question, if I were to revert to 3.0.2.10 myself would the
> current message bases then be automatically re-threadable to their earlier
> reference only formats? Or has there been a none reversable change in
> message base formats?

No problem at all if you revert to 3.0.2.10, I do it several times a day
some times. You will see your messages properly threaded by Reference.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4






 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread MAU
Hello Prezes,

M>> However, quite unfortunately and as I think I have explained before in
M>> this list, the threading by Reference+Subject which was introduced with
M>> this beta series is a "no-no" for me and that forces me to revert all
M>> the way to 3.0.2.10.
> 
> Confirmed - this is the reason why I don't use any 3.0.9.x versions,
> but only 3.0.2.10 - and I can't test them...

Well, I have downloaded and installed all of them and do some testing on
my spare time (which is not much). I would be willing to take the risk
of new or unknown bugs by using betas for my normal work which I think
is a good test bed, but I can't do so because the change made to
threading by Reference (which is not a bug).

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4






 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Prezes
Hello,
Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 1:04:28 PM, you wrote:

M> However, quite unfortunately and as I think I have explained before in
M> this list, the threading by Reference+Subject which was introduced with
M> this beta series is a "no-no" for me and that forces me to revert all
M> the way to 3.0.2.10.

Confirmed - this is the reason why I don't use any 3.0.9.x versions,
but only 3.0.2.10 - and I can't test them...

-- 
Best regards,
 Prezes  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Bat! v3.0.2.10, Windows XP 5.1, Build 2600, Service Pack 1


--
Startuj z INTERIA.PL! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f186c 



 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Chris Wilson
Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 2:33:33 PM, you wrote:


> Hello MAU,

> Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 5:04:28 AM, you wrote:
M>> I know RIT guys intend to re-instate the possibility of threading
M>> by Reference _only_ (and hopefully allowing also Reference+Subject
M>> to satisfy everyone) and I can understand that this is not a high
M>> priority at this time for most users and therefore for RIT. But it
M>> does "force" me to use 3.0.2.10 during my works hours and I am
M>> sorry about it.

> I'm not reverting, but I agree with you 100%... It's extremely
> irritating to have to hunt down messages which get buried in threads
> that are months to years old even though they just came in yesterday.


For someone like myself who uses TB! to keep abreast of customers
ordering parts and their later satisfaction it's embarrassing when I am
told that I have failed to follow up on an enquiry for just the reasons
you cite.

I have a question, if I were to revert to 3.0.2.10 myself would the
current message bases then be automatically re-threadable to their earlier
reference only formats? Or has there been a none reversable change in
message base formats?



-- 
Best regards,
 Chris Wilson   
   The Bat 3.0.9.17 Return on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 
Number 2195 Service Pack 4



 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello MAU,

Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 5:04:28 AM, you wrote:
M> I know RIT guys intend to re-instate the possibility of threading
M> by Reference _only_ (and hopefully allowing also Reference+Subject
M> to satisfy everyone) and I can understand that this is not a high
M> priority at this time for most users and therefore for RIT. But it
M> does "force" me to use 3.0.2.10 during my works hours and I am
M> sorry about it.

I'm not reverting, but I agree with you 100%... It's extremely
irritating to have to hunt down messages which get buried in threads
that are months to years old even though they just came in yesterday.


-- 
 __       TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons: http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PCWSmileys: http://PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php

Tagline of the day:
Steal this tagline... and I'll tie-dye your cat!!!





 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread Peter Fjelsten
MAU,

On 19-04-2005 13:04, you [M] wrote in
:
M> But it does "force" me to use 3.0.2.10 during my works hours and I am
M> sorry about it.

Agreed. For me this is also so annoying that I cannot test betas to any
significant degree before this is fixed.

-- 
 Best regards   
 Peter Fjelsten  
 3.0.1.33 Pro 
 ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. 

 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 

  




 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10

2005-04-19 Thread MAU
Hello all,

After deleting my existing tbuser.def and a couple of tweaks I find the
last beta, v3.0.9.17 quite stable and would certainly like to use it all
day long for my work, which is the way I like to test betas.

However, quite unfortunately and as I think I have explained before in
this list, the threading by Reference+Subject which was introduced with
this beta series is a "no-no" for me and that forces me to revert all
the way to 3.0.2.10.

I know RIT guys intend to re-instate the possibility of threading by
Reference _only_ (and hopefully allowing also Reference+Subject to
satisfy everyone) and I can understand that this is not a high priority
at this time for most users and therefore for RIT. But it does "force"
me to use 3.0.2.10 during my works hours and I am sorry about it.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4






 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/