Re: NFS Bug: YES as a sub-filter but NO as a filter
Hello MAU, Monday, August 23, 2004, 11:25 you wrote at mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [6FBF6861.01C48838.255F0232.619556FE] Name: Lista\20SIG Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MoveMessage folder \5C\5CMAU\5CMailing\20Lists\5CRed\20Iris\5CSIG endFilter If I use it as a filter, the log shows that some messages have produced a match but the move action is not carried out Can't confirm. -- Regards, Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de Current beta is 2.13 Beta/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
NFS Bug: YES as a sub-filter but NO as a filter
Hello all, This is a bit surprising and strange. I'm testing this very simple filter: Recipient contanis SIG@ TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [6FBF6861.01C48838.255F0232.619556FE] Name: Lista\20SIG Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MoveMessage folder \5C\5CMAU\5CMailing\20Lists\5CRed\20Iris\5CSIG endFilter If I use it as a filter, the log shows that some messages have produced a match but the move action is not carried out and the matching messages remain in the Inbox. Manual re-filtering does the same. However, if I move this filter in as a sub-filter, the move action _is_ done both when downloading messages and when re-filtering manually. Strange, don't you think? Can anyone confirm? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 2.13 Beta/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
