Re: Bug Report

[Thomas Fernandez]

Hello Goncalo,

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:35:14 + GMT (17/02/2005, 14:35 +0700 GMT),
Goncalo Farias wrote:

GF> did anyone notice that TB! adds several blank lines between text lines
GF> in HTML messages created with (at least) Outlook?

Yes. Often, but somehow not always. I didn't analyse the source,
though.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Tuesday at 4:00 PM there will be an ice cream social. All ladies
giving milk will please come early.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: bug report

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mark,

on Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:21:58 +0100GMT (08.12.03, 13:21 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

MP> Tried (actually did) to make a bug report (about the disappearing screen when
MP> trying to write a new or reply to an existing message).

MP> When I had already entered it, I saw in the listing it mentioned SecureBat,
MP> which wasn't meant. I suppose this can not be corrected?

Sure, you can always add a bug note or close "your" report.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

This message was created with The Bat!, version 2.02 CE RC2
under OS Windows 98, 4, 10, build ,
on a Pentium II machine at 200MHz, 64 MB RAM

Winamp currently playing: Beatles - I Want You (She's So Heavy)



 Current beta is 2.02 CE RC2 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: bug report address

[Alexander Leschinsky]

Hello SyP,

   On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:44:06 +0200 (29.07.02 22:44 my local time)
   you wrote about "bug report address",
   at least in part:

S> It seems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Help->Feedback->Bug report) has some
S> problems?
No problems actually for bugs, one of my addresses is non-functional
now (thanks to nobrained admin of host), but I receive all on reserve
address

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander Leschinsky

Powered by The Bat! 1.61
Weakened by Windows 98 4.10. A 

- MOTD:
Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have 
no self.
Cyril Connolly



_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/

Re: bug report address

[Dierk Haasis]

Hello SyP!

On Monday, July 29, 2002 at 6:44:06 PM you wrote:

> It seems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Help->Feedback->Bug report) has some
> problems?

Could BugTraq be the reason as bugs should be reported there
centrally?


-- 
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.61 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Lover's happiness: As long as I have you, I can endure all the
troubles you inevitably bring. (Ashleigh Brilliant/Derek Leveret)


_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/

Re: bug report - Ctrl-F misbehaves

[Peter Palmreuther]

Hello SyP,

On Friday, February 1, 2002 at 11:25:12 PM you wrote (at least in
part):

S> Sometimes pressing CTRL+F in either the folder or the message list
S> pane brings up Message Finder instead of Forward.

Not sometimes over here, but every time.
Having a look at 'View' / 'Edit Shortcuts' showed me +F is
assigned twice in 'Message List Pop-Up': 'Find Message' & 'Forward'.
Double-clicking the former and deleting the shortcut with using
 solved this problem for me ...
Should be fixed from RITlabs side, as there shouldn't be
double-assignments coded in :-)
Maybe they should have a look at 'Warnings' too before shipping the
executable *ggg*
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.54 Beta/34 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1)

"We hold that each man is the best judge of his own interest."  --
John Adams --


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/

Re: Bug report

[Dierk Haasis]

Hello Anton!

On 11 Jan 2002 at 12:54:39 you wrote:

> Latest The Bat! betas don't do periodical mail checking (?). They
> stopped doing that since some of the betas... Strange.

Not  confirmed.



-- 
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/26 on Windows 95 4.0 67306684 C

Doing something with your own hands is *not* creativity; or
masturbation would be an artform everybody is excelling in. (Derek
Leveret)


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com

Re: BUG report: smime certificates - still missing in b10

[Marek Mikus]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Maxim Masiutin wrote:

> >  As  in  subject  - after installing 1.54 beta 10 address book does'nt
> >  see certificates previously imported :-(
> >  Notice that this bug was reported also with 1.54 beta 9 ...
>
>   Could you please download http://www.ritlabs.com/tb154b10e.rar and
>   tell wether the bug has been fixed or not.

Cert's are displayed in Account Properties now, but when I want to send
S/MIME signed message (with "Sign when completed" option enabled), TB
display error: "AV at address 0069A081 in module 'THEBAT.EXE'. Read of
address ".

-- 

Marek Mikus
Czech Support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.ipex.cz


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Beta: 1.54 beta/10
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com

Re: Bug Report (Beta/9): S/MIME-Certs disappeared [was: Certificates Missing]

[Thomas F]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Gerry,

On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:47:10 -0400 GMT (21/09/2001, 03:47 +0800 GMT),
Gerry Doyon wrote:

JS>> But your signature appears invalid...

GD> Not to me they don't!!! They are completely valid for me.

Markc's and your signature appeaar valid ehre as well. I never
installed any certificates.

- --

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

He who hesitates is probably right.


Message reply created with The Bat! 1.54 Beta/8
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using a Celeron 366 MHz, 128MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Cyber-Knights Templar 6.5.8ckt (build 05)
Comment: Key ID: 0x79493AEC

iQA/AwUBO6ptIWkcopp5STrsEQLRCwCgmwvNhP0WGr0Hq7k1qPAxb7wMIO0AoK4F
WzK86/uD9XjqC+FAo0RYJrBL
=K30n
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Beta: 1.54 beta/8

Re: bug-report: select text in html engine

[Peter Palmreuther]

Hello Marck,

On Wednesday, August 01, 2001 at 5:15:05 PM you wrote (at least in part):

MDP> It only denies marking. If you copy and paste you'll find the unmarked
MDP> text in the clipboard too. It's not right though.

*puuu* .. Thx ... Seems I was to annoyed I could not select I even did not
try copy _and_ paste :-(

I'm sorry for my mail and hereby change the matter immediately to 'please make
it possible to mark the quotation signs too, even if they already get copied.'

Thx for forgiving my, I was definitely to fast in bug reporting before fully
checked all circumstances.
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2)

Last time I was stoned, I tried to eat an airport.

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
Unsubscribe: 

Re: bug report - various options for sending messages

[Peter Palmreuther]

Hello Thomas,

On Saturday, June 09, 2001 at 10:18:33 AM you wrote:

TF> Same. Therefore I acknowledge your bug. And now I will use the toolbar
TF> icon.

Although I can confirm that, and because the menu tells "send now" it must be
called a bug, I (call me lazy) LIKE that TB! does NOT send the message
immediately when I hit +Enter :-)

OK, I know it does wrong in this case, but I nevertheless like it :-) I'm
ABSOLUTELY used in sending my e-mail with +Enter ... but this was never
an option for me to send immediately. THIS was in every MUA I've used so far
set in the preferences, not by a key-combo.
I DON'T like the "send immediately" way, and I'd be in serious trouble if
+Enter would change it's behavior but I have an idea how to make most of
us happy (I dunno how many people are preferring the use of their keyboard
over the mouse, so I may be totaly wrong with my suggestion, but nevertheless
here it is :) ):

- Make +Enter send the way it is told in the account-preferences
- Make F2 send the opposite way
- Correct the menu texts to reply on this (new) behavior :-)

THAT's I'd appreciate it :-)

Just my 0.02 € :-)
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.53 RC/2 on Windows 98 4.90 Build 3000   [WindowsME])

People must not do things for fun. We are not here for fun. There is no
reference to fun in any Act of Parliament.

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Bug report - Control Center again

[Screwyluie]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


IS> A message currently being sent can be cancelled/aborted in the Control
IS> Center, but the task can not be deleted.

IS> After aborting the transfer and sending another message The Bat! can't
IS> be closed (only killed with Ctrl-Alt-Del).

confirmed, it won't close because when you hit abort it hangs on
"logging off from server" it never seems to finish that so it won't
let you close TB!
it does seem to abort, just never finishes the process, and you indeed
can't delete the task
most annoying

- --
  " Fiery the Angels fell...
  And as they fell deep thunder
  rolled around their shores
  indignant, burning with the
  fires of Orc. "
- --
Using The Bat! v1.53 Beta/4
System: AMD K6-2 500; 128mb Ram
OS: Windows 2000 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
- --
Until Next Time,
  Screwyluie  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt

iQA/AwUBOv78+dF7IRNuzN4bEQKmAgCfU0XeibWij8L2frsb36/03kANs+QAn1Hr
T6H9dIgd1l8Wjymop2lWLrOD
=gpzh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Bug report - Alt+Left after Ctrl+Shift+Del

[Thomas]

Hello Andrew,

On Fri, 4 May 2001 16:51:54 +0400 GMT (04/05/2001, 20:51 +0800 GMT),
Andrew K. Lovetski wrote:

AKL> I see two ways of fixing the bug: one is just to remove the
AKL> moved\deleted entries from the list.
[...]
AKL> What way do you think is the best one?

The first one, the one I didn't snip. Just MHO.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

The hardness of the butter is directly proportional to the softness of
the bread.


Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/14
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
using a Celeron 366 MHz, 128MB RAM


-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Bug report - GPF

[Michal Kosinski]

 B-stok/PL, Wednesday, February 28, 2001


On Wednesday, February 28, 2001  at 5:27:44 PM, Lija wrote:


L> Can you confirm this?

Not confirmed here.

-- 
Best regards,
Michal "kosa" Kosinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TB! 1.51 Beta/1 (S/N 1C2D55D1) | Windows NT 5 build 2195

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: BUG report?

[David Elliott]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi MaXxX,

On 09 February 2001 at 09:01:53 +0100 (which was 08:01 where I live) words
of wisdom emanated from MaXxX.

M> Hello Batters.

M> I know this is part of the way most sendmail daemons work, but try to send an
M> e-mail with a single-dot line...

M> .   <-  like this.

.

M> The Bat! will truncate the mail at this line. Shouldn't it, by any chance,
M> change this single dot into "dot-and-space" before sending it to the server,
M> so that it doesn't turn into an end-of-mail control string?

M> Does it work this way with you too?



- --
 Thank you for your time,  ___
  David   |David  Elliott|   Software Engineer|
 _| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534  |
| Subj: Tags   Conf: (38) SL-TAG  |

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: PGP Signed, sealed, delivered.

iQA/AwUBOoQjf/mK8eZlD0U0EQJ2QACg+Vlsc7I/GBUake4EhznYZh0mNGAAnjbW
aMMC34v4tPoTqcwA9/UE2U+V
=erI+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: BUG report?

[David Elliott]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello MaXxX,

On 09 February 2001 at 09:01:53 +0100 (which was 08:01 where I live) words
of wisdom emanated from MaXxX.

M> The Bat! will truncate the mail at this line.

M> Does it work this way with you too?

Not confirmed.

The Bat! to MDaemon  to The Bat!.

A dot on the line below

.

- --

 Best regards, ___
  David   |   The Bat! 1.49e, PGP 6.5.8   | E-mailaholics |
 _| Win 2000 Server 5.0.2195 SP1  | International |
| "Tagline?  What's that?  And are we TAXING it?"  - Bill Clinton |

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: PGP Signed, sealed, delivered.

iQA/AwUBOoQkpfmK8eZlD0U0EQJeswCgrkTYb3g6tZNLRy59E9rS/TIY4o4AnR2k
kHQKsSA00Hjhh7TCUgOnOhgp
=OgK0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Bug report

[Marck D. Pearlstone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Andreas,

On 06 November 2000 at 03:39:59 GMT +0100 (which was 02:39 where I
live) Andreas Schwartmann wrote and made these points:

AS> 1. Account/Backup
AS> 2. Backup file: 

AS> When I try to browse my folders to change the backup path, the
AS>  button does not work. Nothing happens, when I click it.
AS> (ß1.48/2, Windows 2000, SP 1)

They're not supposed to ... yet. Stefan says "they're work in progress
and not functional so no bug reports please".

- --
Cheers,
.\\arck
 
[Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  ]
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[ PGP Key:  ]

 Air Pollution is a mist-demeanor
 
 TB! v1.48 Beta/2 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOgYbHTnkJKuSnc2gEQI7+gCfWnZhA/l7v6tQkC18tUEOwQyqfY0An1Mc
pXJJAewxwjgbss+RMPaOTTq2
=2x5w
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

[Manfred Ell]

On Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 9:40:28 PM, you wrote:

> Aha - a clue. I don't see a "blank" gender. I see Unspecified, Male or
> Female. I never see it "blank". It works perfectly here (same OS as
> you, same TB version).


If it doesn't work consistently (and we have several users with the
problem) than it IS a bug.
 

Regards

-- 
Manfred Ell

using TheBat 1.47 Beta/7 on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

[Marck D. Pearlstone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Manfred,

On 18 October 2000 at 18:38:07 GMT +0200 (which was 17:38 where I
live) Manfred Ell wrote and made these points on the subject
of "bug report: address book - gender-setting":

 Open any entry which has its gender set, close it using the
 'ok'-button & the gender has been blanked out.

>> I can't duplicate that here.

ME> I just tried this again: I opened the address book, opened the
ME> properties of one of the contacts, added the gender (which was
ME> blank), pressed OK and opened it again: the gender is blank.

ME> This wasn't there in previous betas.  But I normally don't use
ME> this

Aha - a clue. I don't see a "blank" gender. I see Unspecified, Male or
Female. I never see it "blank". It works perfectly here (same OS as
you, same TB version).

- --
Cheers,
.\\arck
 
[Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  ]
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[ PGP Key:  ]

 What do you do when you see an endangered
animal eating an endangered plant?
 
 TB! v1.47 Beta/7 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOe38sznkJKuSnc2gEQIGCQCdGnWqLDFYKL1FSTtwOdWEfz1/IrsAoIpC
602Qg2G74aesSkZD4PeBznR1
=S1jM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

[Richard M. Newman]

Hi Marck,

M> Gender Icon? Wassat?
   In the address book there is a little icon next to each name.
   The icon has what looks like a "blue" body for male and "red"
   body for female. It is very subtle but real.

Best,
  Richard
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Sent Wednesday, October 18, 2000@5:20 PM using The Bat! 1.47 Beta/7
on a Pentium III 1 Ghz using Windows 98 4 10 
---
On Wednesday, October 18, 2000@3:50 PM you wrote:
M> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
M> Hash: SHA1

M> Hi Richard,

M> On 18 October 2000 at 14:08:50 GMT -0400 (which was 19:08 where I
M> live) Richard M. Newman wrote and made these points on the subject
M> of "bug report: address book - gender-setting":

M>>> I just tried this again: I opened the address book, opened the
M>>> properties of one of the contacts, added the gender (which was
M>>> blank), pressed OK and opened it again: the gender is blank.

RMN>>Confirmed here.
RMN>> Even stranger is . . . the address book holds the correct
RMN>> gender icon despite the blank field!

M> Gender Icon? Wassat?

M> - --
M> Cheers,
M> .\\arck
M>  
M> [Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  ]
M> [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
M> [ PGP Key:  ]

M>  Smash forehead on keyboard to continue...
M>  
M>  TB! v1.47 Beta/7 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

M> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
M> Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
M> Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

M> iQA/AwUBOe3/BDnkJKuSnc2gEQKcUwCfcY+N12Fp/K2/OBGnT2iiqfWWEy0AoI2l
M> 8YXD7faQ9YyTRiZcaQyBdKiB
M> =LYl2
M> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

[Nick Danger]

In Reference to "bug report: address book - gender-setting" From Marck D. Pearlstone:

M> Gender Icon? Wassat?

I'd assume he's referring to the coloration (red or blue) that takes
place on the little person icon.

-- 
ò¸ó Nick [MUA: TB! 1.47 Beta/7]
 Danger  [OS: Win98 4.10 1998]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

[Manfred Ell]

On Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 9:50:27 PM, you wrote:

> Hi Richard,

> On 18 October 2000 at 14:08:50 GMT -0400 (which was 19:08 where I
> live) Richard M. Newman wrote and made these points on the subject
> of "bug report: address book - gender-setting":

M>>> I just tried this again: I opened the address book, opened the
M>>> properties of one of the contacts, added the gender (which was
M>>> blank), pressed OK and opened it again: the gender is blank.

RMN>>Confirmed here.
RMN>> Even stranger is . . . the address book holds the correct
RMN>> gender icon despite the blank field!

> Gender Icon? Wassat?

Have a look at the icons of the address book entries: males have a blue
(small) icon, females red and undefined sort of grey. I mean the small
person inside the icon. It could be bigger so it is easily missed.

Regards

-- 
Manfred Ell

using TheBat 1.47 Beta/7 on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Bug report - templates is dangerous

[Marck D. Pearlstone]

Hi Nik,

On 08 August 2000 at 11:20:00 GMT +0600 (which was 06:20 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Bug report - templates is dangerous":

N>   The bug description:
N> When  creating a new message from the list of favourites,
N> template  of folder to which installed cursor is executed
N> together with the template of favourite (alternately), as
N> a result message can get to other addressee. 
N> (For the first time noticed in Thebat 1.36
N> and is present in all rest versions).
  
For  this  reason I moved all of my templates to the address book long
ago and don't use folder templates.

-- 
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
www: http://www.silverstones.com
PGP key: 
*---
| Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
*---

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Bug report, cursor freezing

[Thomas Fernandez]

Hello Chris,

On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:41:26 +0100 GMT (24/07/00, 21:41 +0800 GMT),
Chris Wilson wrote:

CW> Is there any reason not to overwrite the beta I am using with the
CW> release version? I may try and see if this fixes the cursor problem if
CW> it's deemed safe. Applied for my registration about an hour ago, and
CW> received it just this minute. I am impressed (and registered) :-)

No reason, I do that all the time. That's not quite true. I just
overwrite if a new beta is out; if a new release version is out, I
download from the "normal" (non-beta) site and run the whole install
thing. The only reason for that is, that often the help files and
other stuff gets updated too. The beta site contains only the .exe
files.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.45 S/MIME
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
using a Celeron 366 MHz, 128MB RAM



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: bug report - allow 8 bit chars in msg. header

[Syafril Hermansyah]

Hello Ming-Li,

Responding  to  your article on Wednesday, July 12, 2000 at 03:09:35 GMT
-0700 (which was 12/07/2000 17:09 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :

[ ... ]

ML> BTW, does any know whether we should still file an official bug
ML> report after a series of discussion like this?

Yes, that's help Developer to remind, and don't forget to cc: ing to the
list.

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -

+--+
Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto  : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600  
URL : | FAX : (62) (21) 351-9241  
+--+

Using The Bat! 1.45 Beta/6
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 

Created : Wednesday, July 12, 2000, 18:25:22 GMT +0700

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: bug report - allow 8 bit chars in msg. header

[Ming-Li]

Hi SyP,

> when there were no 8 bit characters in the "To:" field, there were
> no problems.

Confirmed. 8-bit characters in other fields (From & Subject were
tested) would not cause any problem. Putting one in the "To:" field
would cause the problem as you described.

And after dozens of tests, I also found some other interesting
things (same setting: Acc1-allow 8-bit in header, Acc2-no):

1. The changes is done the moment you move the message (from
Acc1-Outbox to Acc2-Outbox). It doesn't appear that way when you
look at it in Acc2-Outbox. But I found that out when I export the
message from Acc2-Outbox (before sending it out) and look at it with
an text editor. Same with the one in Acc2-Sent. I.e., when you look
at the message in TB with View/[RFC-822 headers] enabled, you see:

To: Szabolcs Péter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

But when you export the message to a msg file and open it with a
text editor, you see:

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Szabolcs_P=E9ter?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

In contrast, if the message is created natively in Acc2, you should
see this when previewing it in the Outbox (with headers shown):

To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?U3phYm9sY3MgUOl0ZXI=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

2. With the "Allow Local Delivery" option enabled, the message
received wouldn't have some headers spilled into the body. If not
(if the message is delivered through the normal smtp-pop3 process),
that happens. I think it's because smtp or pop3 server has trouble
interpreting the header (for the "To:" field is gone) and somehow it
put extra blank lines into the header. If I'm not mistaken, any
thing after a blank line is considered the message body.

That's it. I think you've found a bug.

BTW, does any know whether we should still file an official bug
report after a series of discussion like this?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: BUG REPORT: Address book

[Allie Martin]

On Tue, 4 Jul 2000 22:28:40 +0100, Jamie Dainton wrote:

JD> Steps to recreate bug:
JD> 1) Launch address book by pressing F8 or the toolbar button.
JD> 2) Add a contact or edit and existing contact.
JD> 3) Stand back and watch it slow down and crash.

I can't reproduce the described instability here.

-- 
ALLIE ...   [ TB! v1.45 Beta/5 | Win2k Pro ]
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

 "NETWORK: What fishermen do when not fishing. "

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org