Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Maxim, MM> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. MM> Go to S/MIME Preferences (Options|S/MIME) window and check "Use MM> timestamping server for digital signatures", http://time.certum.pl/ MM> as a server. How can I set up a HTTP proxy? I don't have a direct Internet HTTP connection so everything I can see in the Account Log is the following line: > 08.04.2008, 09:45:59: HTTP - Host address resolving error: The > requested name is valid and was found in the database, but it does not > have the correct associated data being resolved for for > http://timestamp.verisign.com/scripts/timstamp.dll p.s. One "for" is superfluous in the "for for". -- Eugene Gladchenko EVG15-RIPE smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.20.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Maxim, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:40 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 10:51 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MM> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. Doesn't work with 4.0.20. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.20 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Thomas, on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:18:08 +0700GMT (28.03.2008, 19:18 +0100GMT here), you wrote: TF> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:57:32 +0100 GMT (29/03/2008, 00:57 +0700 GMT), TF> Peter Meyns wrote: MM>>> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. PM>> 4.0.18.7: It still connects to the time server but the result is not PM>> displayed in the signature. TF> No? I venture that you signed your message at 00:57:33 hrs. The result of the "signed timestamp" should be that the timestamp shouldn't only be set, but, well, signed. As it is in Maxim's initial message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.7 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM Current beta is 4.0.18.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hello Peter, On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:57:32 +0100 GMT (29/03/2008, 00:57 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: MM>> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. PM> 4.0.18.7: It still connects to the time server but the result is not PM> displayed in the signature. No? I venture that you signed your message at 00:57:33 hrs. -- Cheers, Thomas. The difference between a king and a president is that a king is the son of his father but a president is not. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.18.7 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.18.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Maxim, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:40 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 10:51 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MM> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. 4.0.18.7: It still connects to the time server but the result is not displayed in the signature. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.7 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Maxim, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:40 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 10:51 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MM> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. I'll try it now on Win2K. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.6 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195 plenty of POP accounts,no IMAP, OTFE enabled, several newsgroups via MyGate Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Maxim, on Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:25:27 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 23:25 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MM> Wednesday, March 26, 2008, 6:55:57 PM, you wrote: >> I see the verification of the sig, but not the verification of the >> time as in Maxim's message. I'll try it again. MM> Probably, The Bat! cannot connect to the timestamp server, and the MM> error is not reported to the user. Could you please check the account MM> log file? In a new version of The Bat! we will make connection errors MM> reported to the user explicitly. In the log it reads "received"... ,- [ account log ] | >26.03.2008, 17:40:30: HTTP - Received http://time.certum.pl/ | 26.03.2008, 17:40:49: SEND - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue | 26.03.2008, 17:40:49: SEND - connected to SMTP server | 26.03.2008, 17:40:49: SEND - authenticating (plain)... | 26.03.2008, 17:40:49: SEND - sending message to tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com | <26.03.2008, 17:40:56: SEND - message to tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com sent (4201 bytes) | 26.03.2008, 17:40:56: SEND - connection finished - 1 message(s) sent `- -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.6 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hello all, Wednesday, March 26, 2008, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > You can find out more about timestamps at > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_timestamping > Currently, only the internal implementation of S/MIME supports > timestamping. Go to S/MIME Preferences (Options|S/MIME) window and check > "Use timestamping server for digital signatures", > http://time.certum.pl/ as a server. can You please add button like "Check" which will connect to entered host and confirm this connection was established correctly? There can be mistake in path or HTTP connection can be blocked by firewall and there is no indication, this is working... and maybe there could be some indication about checked timestamp in icon of Message Header Pane -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 4.0.18.6 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 2.7.1.7 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp - Voyager
Hi, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:54:07 +0100GMT I wrote: PM> on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:40 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 10:51 +0100GMT here), PM> you wrote: MM>> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. PM> As the option is there in Voyager 4.0.18.4, I'll also try it here. PM> After all, I updated all my certs now, so I use them. :) I didn't expect it to work. It is 4.0.18.4 after all. But I'm happy to see that Voyager still works well with S/MIME. The verified timestamp isn't that important, especially not for my use of Voyager. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! Voyager v4.0.18.4 on a 128MB stick plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate Current OS: Windows 2000,v.5.0,Build 2195 Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp - Voyager
Hi Maxim, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:40 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 10:51 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MM> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. As the option is there in Voyager 4.0.18.4, I'll also try it here. After all, I updated all my certs now, so I use them. :) -- Cheers Peter The Bat! Voyager v4.0.18.4 on a 128MB stick plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate Current OS: Windows 2000,v.5.0,Build 2195 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Thomas, on Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:28:16 +0700GMT (26.03.2008, 18:28 +0100GMT here), you wrote: TF>>> I see you signed this at 23:56 - a minute after you posted the TF>>> message. PM>> That was about the time I was connected to he time server, before the PM>> message was actually signed and sent. In your statement you must PM>> replace "posted" with "created", then it's ok. TF> So, WAD. Do you agree? Yes. But still I don't see a verified timestamp like the one I see when I verify Maxim's initial message. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.6 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hello Peter, On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:25:15 +0100 GMT (27/03/2008, 00:25 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: PM>>> I see the verification of the sig, but not the verification of the PM>>> time as in Maxim's message. I'll try it again. TF>> I see you signed this at 23:56 - a minute after you posted the TF>> message. PM> That was about the time I was connected to he time server, before the PM> message was actually signed and sent. In your statement you must PM> replace "posted" with "created", then it's ok. So, WAD. Do you agree? -- Cheers, Thomas. 3. If a word is misspelled in the dictionary, how would we ever know? http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Thomas, on Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:10:28 +0700GMT (26.03.2008, 18:10 +0100GMT here), you wrote: TF> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:55:57 +0100 GMT (26/03/2008, 23:55 +0700 GMT), TF> Peter Meyns wrote: PM>> I see the verification of the sig, but not the verification of the PM>> time as in Maxim's message. I'll try it again. TF> I see you signed this at 23:56 - a minute after you posted the TF> message. That was about the time I was connected to he time server, before the message was actually signed and sent. In your statement you must replace "posted" with "created", then it's ok. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.6 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hello Peter, On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:55:57 +0100 GMT (26/03/2008, 23:55 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: PM> I see the verification of the sig, but not the verification of the PM> time as in Maxim's message. I'll try it again. I see you signed this at 23:56 - a minute after you posted the message. -- Cheers, Thomas. I earn a seven-figure salary. Unfortunately, there's a decimal point involved. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:05:32 +0100GMT I wrote: PM> on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:42:22 -0400GMT (26.03.2008, 17:42 +0100GMT here), PM> you wrote: MM You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. >>> Well, let's see. V>> Working. PM> Yes, but only for the signature. Maybe it is because I didn't import PM> the Certum certificate first. I did now. Let's see. hmm No. There must be more to it. I hope Max will enlighten me. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.6 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Vili, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:42:22 -0400GMT (26.03.2008, 17:42 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MM>>> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. >> Well, let's see. V> Working. Yes, but only for the signature. Maybe it is because I didn't import the Certum certificate first. I did now. Let's see. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.6 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Peter, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:39:58 +0100GMT I wrote: PM> on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:40 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 10:51 +0100GMT here), PM> you wrote: MM>> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. PM> Well, let's see. I see the verification of the sig, but not the verification of the time as in Maxim's message. I'll try it again. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.6 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Peter, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:39:58 +0100GMT I wrote: PM> on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:40 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 10:51 +0100GMT here), PM> you wrote: MM>> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. PM> Well, let's see. I saw a window that a time stamp were being created, but where do I see the verification in the message? -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.6 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp
Hi Maxim, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:40 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 10:51 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MM> You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. Well, let's see. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.18.6 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 4.0.18.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
