Re: Missing: Processed by Filtername

2007-09-27 Thread MAU
Hello Peter,

   So fas so good - but TB did not mention this action in the account log
   file. Usually it used to write 'Processed by filtername' to the log.
   This string is completely missing.

   I just realised that it sometimes writes it to the log and sometimes not.
   I fail to see any logic behind this.

Have you been using 'Verbose log' in Account/Properties/Options? There
was a BT report on this (6043), but I can't check its status because BT
pages are inaccessible at the moment.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.99.24 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Missing: Processed by Filtername

2007-09-27 Thread MAU
Hello MAU,

   So fas so good - but TB did not mention this action in the account log
   file. Usually it used to write 'Processed by filtername' to the log.
   This string is completely missing.

   I just realised that it sometimes writes it to the log and sometimes not.
   I fail to see any logic behind this.

 Have you been using 'Verbose log' in Account/Properties/Options? There
 was a BT report on this (6043), but I can't check its status because BT
 pages are inaccessible at the moment.

I have checked it the 'hard way'. I have selected 'Verbose log' for
this account and FILTER lines (which include the move to...) are not
logged.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.99.24 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html