Re[2]: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)
Hi Roelof, Friday, June 6, 2008, 2:07:39 PM, you wrote: > Use a quick template (or a default reply template) with something like > this: > %To="%OToList"%- > %CC=""%CC="%OCCList"%- Thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for. -- Best regards, Carsten Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)
Hello Dwight, Sunday, June 8, 2008, 10:26:01 AM, you wrote: DC> On Saturday, June 7, 2008, 4:10:57 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: >> Well, that's something I agree with. It's important to whom you >> address a message and to whom you give notice. DC> I'd think in the adult world what would be important would be that all DC> the right people got the mail. In the business world, if a mail is addressed to several people, who will be the one who answers? If the sender puts several addresses in the same company / department into the TO field, my experience shows that everybody thinks one of the others will reply and therefore nobody will. There are reasons to have multiple recipients in the TO field, for example when you send party invitations to a small group of friends. Whether replies should go to all or only to the host, is another discussion. In any case, whoever replies to a message with multiple TO recipients, will reply to the person who sent the message, not to the others being copied in. Hence, I agree wth Roelof. -- Cheers, Thomas. Die Sztahlfabriken von Birmingham verbrauchen so viel Stahl, das aller Stahl, welcher fabricirt wird, dazu nicht ausreichen wuerde. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.24.11 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)
In reply to : RO> Hallo Carsten, RO> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:51:28 +0200GMT (6-6-2008, 10:51 +0200, where I RO> live), you wrote: CGS>> In a business environment it is crucial that people who are in CGS>> TO: stay in TO: and those in CC: stay in CC:, because that's a CGS>> huge difference! CGS>> Can this be fixed? Or is there a way to get around this bug CGS>> using templates? RO> Use a quick template (or a default reply template) with something like Isn't that a work around? RO> In order to do this real fancy, you should use some regexp to RO> exclude the old sender in case he put his address in the old CC: RO> header, but that's something you should manage yourself. RO> To be honest, I like TB's current behaviour in this. It really doesn't do much sense, IMHO. I agree with Carsten it make all the difference (IMHO, not only in Business environments) who you send the message to and who you give notice of that. And when replying, is of good sense (at least) to keep it the same way. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias I'm here because I'm not all there. Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
