Re[3]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi Paul,


PVN> We are here to help. I have never seen helpfulness in rude &
PVN> vulgar language.

Fine, I appreciate that. (Both of it, in case you're wondering. ;-) )


PVN> I didn't quarrel with the content. It was the delivery.

Ok, let's leave it at that, shall we?


-- 
MfG,
 Altomailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgp2ZIR6kMf4n.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 4.0.24.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Paul,

Thank you for introducing a degree of reason into a discussion which
will by its very nature, get us absolutely nowhere!

I have found Ritlabs most co-operative when I reported problems over
many years. That there are problems over many years is part of the
real world of software development. A product with 100% functionality
for 100% of possible markets has yet to be developed - and I would
suggest that we shouldn't hang around too long bemoaning the lack of
such products.

Would those critical of Ritlabs please look around them at the myriad
of products out there for which no dialogue is possible with the
developers.

Keep operating in such a reasonable manner - it is most refreshing to
hear such common sense - something these days that is not all that common.!

Best regards,
Hamish



 Current beta is 4.0.24.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to  :

AS>> Don't  forget  that neither of us is here to please RIT, and that
AS>> does (if not, it ought to) include you. This is not a fanclub.

PVN> We  are  here  to  help.  I have never seen helpfulness in rude &
PVN> vulgar language.

We are here to provide feedback, either good or bad. In this case it's
bad feedback.


AS>> We  are here solely because RIT failed to live up to its promises
AS>> and  does  not show any indications on changing this behaviour in
AS>> the futere. Do not confuse the guilty party here.

PVN> I  didn't  quarrel with the content. It was the delivery. Ritlabs
PVN> in one of the most generous developers I know, allowing unlimited
PVN> updates  in  a  major  version,  always  trying  to make a better

They  just  allow  unlimited  updates  because the product is not good
enough when they consider it a release. For instance, the first v4 got
out  of  beta  into release in less than a week when people were still
pointing out several bugs.

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

People have one thing in common: they are all different.



 Current beta is 4.0.24.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html