Re[5]: Interface Inconsistencies
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : If I sent you an email in 1996 and it stayed on your ISP mail server until today how should it appear on email client? With today's date or 1996? I I was importing emails from my local drive that was _already_ I downloaded. Its not on my ISP. I always download and delete my I email from the server. You're avoiding my question, I'm just curious if on purpose or not. I And in case you didn't know this already, _only_ the Bat! does I this. NO other email does this. None. It's different, not necessarily wrong. I Its wrong. Until you answer my question it's JUST different. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Please be sure to exit before leaving. - Jack Treger Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[5]: Interface Inconsistencies
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I'm going to cite Walter Bright regarding something everybody was doing differently: As James Kanze explained on comp.lang.c++.moderated, DMC++ is correct according to the Standard. However, nobody else does it that way, and the Standard is going to be changed to make such code correct. I LOL!! I remember that one. The standard was never changed. heh That's normal since it's only been a few months since Walter said that on Sat, 23 Dec 2006. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias The Greatest Right is the Right 'To Fail' Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[5]: Interface Inconsistencies
8/22/2007 2:14 PM Hi Indie_Dev, On 8/22/2007 Indie_Dev wrote: I Well, that can be resolved by just not reading topics that don't I interest you. There was a great solution for this, the filter I just created sends your messages to the trash. It allows me to focus on the contributors who clean out the non-pertinent stuff in a reply and state problems and suggestions in a manner focused on improvement rather than bashing. -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Current beta is 3.99.20 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[5]: Interface Inconsistencies
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : It seems illogical for it to work that way with that view setting. It seems you want to bend TB! to conform to you instead of learning how to use the program. Thunderbird needs a developer, seems like a golden opportunity for you. TB! is chock full of stuff not found elsewhere. Is it perfect? What is? I Thats a pretty odd assumption. I If you can select all messages in one dialog and not the other, when I in fact BOTH dialogs offer the _same_ functionality, thats 100% I wrong and _inconsistent_. There's absolutely no argument there, unless I of course you're a fan of straw arguments. It's not exactly the same functionality so it's not that inconsistent. Who said that they should behave exactly the same way? I don't if you're going accept this comparison as reasonable but here goes: Thumbnail view is one of the available views in Explorer were it's possible to see the content of picture files before opening and that's not possible in any of the available views. To mimic the functionality of the attachment pane to the attachments button it would have to be possible to choose any random set of files for deletion because its one of the possible thing you can do with the pane view. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Windows IS NOT a virus...viruses do something. Current beta is 3.99.20 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
