Re[2]: Voyager 3.99.8
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MDK Hello Maxim, MDK On Thursday, May 31, 2007 at 7:18:52 PM, you wrote the following on the MDK subject of Voyager 3.99.8 and sent it to MDK tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com MDK http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager 3.99.4? MDK Snip..8...Snip..8... MDK Why do Ritlabs still maintain both The Bat! and Voyager? MDK I used voyager on my desktop as well as my portable flash drive and MDK never had a problem. Surely they can just have the one that works on both MDK systems and cut development time and other such issues? Different target audiences? I may be wrong but I think that Voyager uses always OTFE. I don't need that in my computer, for instance. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias If you're drug free does your doctor know? Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Voyager 3.99.8
Hello Goncalo, On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:14:35 +0100 GMT (02/06/2007, 19:14 +0700 GMT), Goncalo Farias wrote: MDK I used voyager on my desktop as well as my portable flash drive and MDK never had a problem. Surely they can just have the one that works on both MDK systems and cut development time and other such issues? GF Different target audiences? I may be wrong but I think that Voyager GF uses always OTFE. I don't need that in my computer, for instance. I would like to use Voyager on my USB stick also without OTFE. I was thinking about what Mr. D. said, and I couldn't come up with a reason why there should be two versions and not only the Voyager variety (if Voyager allowed the choice of whether to use OTFE or not). He might have a point. -- Cheers, Thomas. FLATULANCE: Emergency vehicle that picks you up when you've been run over by a steam roller http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Voyager 3.99.8
6/2/2007 9:23 AM Hi Thomas, On 6/2/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF I was thinking about what Mr. D. said, and I couldn't come up with a TF reason why there should be two versions and not only the Voyager TF variety (if Voyager allowed the choice of whether to use OTFE or not). TF He might have a point. There are MAPI issues and other considerations when using a removable device. Explaining that to Joe Wal-mart when he buys a machine would be challenges I would not invite. I have been supporting end-users around the world for 20 years. Hence my sensitivity to the issue. -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Voyager 3.99.8
Hello Maxim, Thursday, May 31, 2007, 1:18:52 PM, you wrote: http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe Working fine here. -- Best regards, Raymond Morris TheBat!3.99.8 Voyager AntiSpam= AGAVA AntispamServant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Voyager 3.99.8
Hello Maxim, On Thu, 31 May 2007 21:18:52 +0300 GMT (01/06/2007, 01:18 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe MM What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager 3.99.4? Does it still leave entries in the host computer's registry? -- Cheers, Thomas. Things are more like they are now than they ever were before. - Dwight D. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Voyager 3.99.8
Hello Maxim, On Thursday, May 31, 2007 at 7:18:52 PM, you wrote the following on the subject of Voyager 3.99.8 and sent it to tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager 3.99.4? Snip..8...Snip..8... Why do Ritlabs still maintain both The Bat! and Voyager? I used voyager on my desktop as well as my portable flash drive and never had a problem. Surely they can just have the one that works on both systems and cut development time and other such issues? -- Best regards, Mr.D.Kyle mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Voyager 3.99.8
Reply to message sent 05/31/2007, @ 21:18:52 (1:18 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Maxim, What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager 3.99.4? I've not given it a super close inspection but been running it for 24 hours now under normal work load and no hiccups. Regards, -- ò.ó Nick Danger [MUA: TB! Voyager 3.99.8] [OS: Windows XP 5 1] Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Voyager 3.99.8
Hi Thomas, on Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:14:13 +0700GMT (01.06.2007, 15:14 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MM What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager 3.99.4? TF Does it still leave entries in the host computer's registry? Yes, it does. :-( -- Cheers Peter The Bat! Voyager v3.99.8 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP OS: Windows XP, v.5.1,Build 2600 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Voyager 3.99.8
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager 3.99.4? [-] Voyager didn't support relative paths of protocol logging. [-] List of files in the pop-up menu in the attachment panel was improperly displayed (as a edit-combo box) [-] (#0006352) IMAP protocol mislabeling: IMAP accounts are labeled as POP3 in Account, Properties, Transport pane, although they are properly configured and work correctly. [-] When selecting certificates for encryption, the certificates with sign only purposes are not given to the list. [-] When selecting certificates for signing, the certificates with encrypt only purposes are not given to the list. [*] If you encrypt a message and there is only one recipient's certificate, The Bat! doesn't display any prompt window and silently encrypts to this certificate. [-] When working with certain kinds of hardware security tokens, and when the user was prompted for PIN, there were garbage characters in the input line. [-] Replying to multiple messages/qouting empty selection/without quotes was not working correctly [-] If you send a submission form before saving it, it wasn't saved properly. Further opening of this form have caused an AV. [-] (#0006272) Translation strings were somewhat complicated, this made translation errors possible that could lead to improper visualisation of conditions in the Sorting Office/Filters. [-] Configuration databases could duplicate items at some circumstances [-] The Bat! didn't detect GnuPGP 1.4.7 [*] IMAP: more mail ticker compatible [-] The macro %WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME returns Windows 2003 when used on Windows XP X64 Edition. [-] The Perform per-filter restore string is not available for translation Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
