Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-15 Thread 9Val
Hello NetVicious,  

 Hmm, could any programmer live without variables? ;)

N You could use arrays :P

Check updates in UI ;)

-- 

9Val



 Current beta is 3.00.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-15 Thread 9Val
Hello MaXxX,  

M However, rearranging those buttons in the Actions pane of the NFS, if
M not how I suggested, then maybe in some other similar way?, and adding
M some New, Delete, Move up, Move down buttons to the main filter list
M would help a lot with testing new filter combinations :)

Don't worry, will be done in some days.

-- 

9Val



 Current beta is 3.00.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-14 Thread Boris Anders
Hello Marcus,

Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 09:48 you wrote at 
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I'm thinking about more powerfull options and using
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
 Can you post the list again?

mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
Regards,
Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de



 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-14 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Good [morning|afternoon|day|evening|night]  MaXxX,

M If the quick-template system was somehow extended to allow passing of
M parameters, we'd be home. :]

Done (it took about 3 minutes) :-)

From now on, QTs can be called with parameters:

%QT(QT Name, parameter 1, parameter 2, ...)

To obtain the parameter value, use %_N where N is the number of the
parameter.




-- 
Read you later
 Stefan

...Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.


pgp5XmsI95OyZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-14 Thread Boris Anders
Hello Stefan,

Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 21:31 you wrote at 
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Done (it took about 3 minutes) :-)
Wow, not bad.

 From now on, QTs can be called with parameters:

 %QT(QT Name, parameter 1, parameter 2, ...)

 To obtain the parameter value, use %_N where N is the number of the
 parameter.

Wow, this is such a greate improvement - I still can't imagine the
whole improvments and the meaning for my templates ...






-- 
Regards,
Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de



 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-14 Thread MaXxX
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, at 9:31:46 PM, time seemed to stop as
Stefan Tanurkov uttered these words:

M If the quick-template system was somehow extended to allow passing of
M parameters, we'd be home. :]

 Done (it took about 3 minutes) :-)

 From now on, QTs can be called with parameters:

 %QT(QT Name, parameter 1, parameter 2, ...)

 To obtain the parameter value, use %_N where N is the number of the
 parameter.

Superb!

Ummm, however... All macros so far have a   %MACRO   or
%MACRO=parameter  syntax... I like this new %SYNTAX() a lot more,
but it's not really consistent with the previous one...

... or can we expect a change in the macro syntax, like I described it
some time ago?

%MACRO=parameter changed into %MACRO(parameter) ?
%IF:ab:foo:bar  changed into  %IF(ab,foo,bar) ?

That would make the macro system really consistent and really, really
great! :]

-- 
 |\  /|  \~~~/ \~~~/
 | \/ |  /\  \~/   ICQ# 3146019
 || /__\ /___\ /_\ /___\IQ# 3.14159
Random Broken English: Mitsubishi Pajero wouldn't sell too well in
Spain. Pajero there means gay.


Flyin' high with The Bat! v2.10 RC/1
over the swamps of Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4



 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-14 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, at 23:27:59 [UTC+0200] (Tuesday, September
14, 2004 23:27 my local time) MaXxX wrote:

 %QT(QT Name, parameter 1, parameter 2, ...)

 To obtain the parameter value, use %_N where N is the number of the
 parameter.

[...]

 Ummm, however... All macros so far have a   %MACRO   or
 %MACRO=parameter  syntax... I like this new %SYNTAX() a lot more,
 but it's not really consistent with the previous one...

 ... or can we expect a change in the macro syntax, like I described it
 some time ago?

 %MACRO=parameter changed into %MACRO(parameter) ?
%IF:ab:foo:bar  changed into  %IF(ab,foo,bar) ?

Such syntax exists since TB 1.63 and only the %IF macro differs.
Here are some examples:

%QUOTES(%QINCLUDE(My_Quick_Template))
%IF:%CCLIST==:CC field is empty:%CCLIST
%_MyVariable(%ATTACHMENTS)


-- 
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski
(Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
with Bayes Filter Plugin v1.5.4)



 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-14 Thread MaXxX
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, at 11:41:25 PM, Zygmunt Wereszczynski
jumped on the stage, took a mike and sang:

 Such syntax exists since TB 1.63 and only the %IF macro differs.
 Here are some examples:

 %QUOTES(%QINCLUDE(My_Quick_Template))
 %IF:%CCLIST==:CC field is empty:%CCLIST
 %_MyVariable(%ATTACHMENTS)

I have made a fool of myself, then... Great. And it's in the helpfile,
too.

I should shut up now. :

-- 
 |\  /|  \~~~/ \~~~/
 | \/ |  /\  \~/   ICQ# 3146019
 || /__\ /___\ /_\ /___\IQ# 3.14159
Confucius say: Man with an itchy butt have smelly fingers.


Flyin' high with The Bat! v2.10 RC/1
over the swamps of Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4



 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-14 Thread MaXxX

[-- this is how my original message should have looked like --]

On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, at 9:31:46 PM, Stefan Tanurkov spewed
forth what is to be beheld below:

M If the quick-template system was somehow extended to allow passing of
M parameters, we'd be home. :]

 Done (it took about 3 minutes) :-)

Great! Can't wait to test it. :]

:

-- 
 |\  /|  \~~~/ \~~~/
 | \/ |  /\  \~/   ICQ# 3146019
 || /__\ /___\ /_\ /___\IQ# 3.14159
Random IRC quote: MaXxX and not a word about my pee.  | MaXxX ...
SpeeD, I mean. I gotta clean thi keyboar. | MaXxX --;


Flyin' high with The Bat! v2.10 RC/1
over the swamps of Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4



 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-13 Thread Boris Anders
Hello 9Val,

Monday, September 13, 2004, 23:10 you wrote at 
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Hmm, could any programmer live without variables? ;)
 Done.
Are you leaving Pranayama-zone?

-- 
Regards,
Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de



 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-13 Thread MAU
Hello 9Val,

 Hmm, could any programmer live without variables? ;)
 Done.

No. And neither without beer. I owe you a few already ;-)

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14





 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!

2004-09-13 Thread MaXxX
On Monday, September 13, 2004, at 11:20:33 PM, MaXxX spewed forth what
is to be beheld below:

 So, another tiny little request: please make the variable assignment
 parse macros... Please please... :)

... And another suggestion, perhaps simplifying things?

Condition:
 [Template/Variable] [..] [is/isn't/etc.]

If you make it work on template strings, choosing variable and
entering blahvar would work just like choosing template and
entering %_blahvar... but, oh, think of the possibilities...

 [Template] [%DATE=ddd] [is] [Sat]- filtering on Saturdays...

 [Template] [%ANYPLUGINMACRO...] [is] [anything...]
- filtering with plugins...

I am SO drooling.

-- 
 |\  /|  \~~~/ \~~~/
 | \/ |  /\  \~/   ICQ# 3146019
 || /__\ /___\ /_\ /___\IQ# 3.14159
Famous last words: Umm... Can I UN-cast that Fireball?  I think it
made him mad.


Flyin' high with The Bat! v2.10 RC/1
over the swamps of Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4



 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/