Re[2]: attached files in replies - again

2002-07-18 Thread Norbert Luckhardt

hiyall,

> Please don't requote the entire message for a one line post. It is
> *extremely* bad manners and against the rules of this list.

more over the TBTECH list rules claim (IMHO very correctly):

RULES>g. Please don't post "Me too" and "Thank you" type messages.

please hold on to this rule! may I say "Thank you" for doing so? ;-)

[this message was posted to the list instead of being personally
addressed because the original "THX-post" was from
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with no particular personal name in
it... ]

-- 
kind regards, Shalom
NOrbert
using TB 1.60q


__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: attached files in replies - again

2002-07-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi The,

@18 July 2002, 01:09 -0300 (05:09 UK time)  The Bat Tech List [TBT] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D
Pearlstone:

TBT> Thanks for you solution.

 ... 

MDP>> __
MDP>> Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
MDP>> Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP>> Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Top quoting strikes again!!!

Please don't requote the entire message for a one line post. It is
*extremely* bad manners and against the rules of this list.

As for top quoting, I've made a moderatorial decision to redeliver the
lecture every time it goes wrong:


You're using the "Outlook" standard reply format, one that I find
awful (but I'm feeling more like Canute by the day on that score). It
is called "top quoting" and means that you let the quotes appear at
the bottom and type your reply at the top.

I have many reasons to prefer the "in-line quoting" method:
o  It is hard to follow points raised and counterpoints made when they
   are not interspersed. You have to go from top to bottom to top
   again to review the context.
o  Following on from that, as you go through the quotes interspersing
   your replies and clipping the "fluff", you actually ensure that all
   points raised and questions asked are covered.
o  The message format becomes a lot more conversational.
o  Rather than growing exponentially with each reply in a thread, the
   message size is kept reasonable and to the point - if the
   back-reference is that important, surely it's on file!
o  Responses have immediate context rather than being a bolt out of
   the blue at the top of a message making you scroll down to re-read
   the original - not an easy task when it's in the light grey italics
   I happen to use to show signatures ;-).

I know there are some instances where top-quoting is necessary -
particularly in dealing with a technical support department where an
issue may be passed around from person to person and the entire
message chain needs to be kept live. I actually have a special
template I use for such occasions. At all other times, I will still
champion the cause of conversational email! :-).



As a result of top quoting, your posting includes all signatures and
previous list footers of the message you are replying to - another
no-no and this one is against the list rules. Please trim your replies.


- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.62/Beta1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9Nny5OeQkq5KdzaARAjhMAJ4yxtyHY68A5iEGcf54w99j3/aTFACg7b85
3ozhb2bKPPbGET+lfyXaylU=
=UBZl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]