Re: Macro help!

[Grimnir]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi TBTECH,

Z> On Monday, March 15, 2004, at 23:04:43 [UTC-0800] (Monday, March 15,
Z> 2004 08:04 my local time) Grimnir wrote:

Z> The following macro pairs can also be useful:

Z> %USEPGP / %NOUSEPGP %PGPMIME / %NOPGPMIME

Z> So, use %NOSIGNCOMPLETE and your message will not be signed.

Works great
Thanks again.


I'm using The Bat! Version 2.05 Beta/1
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

- --
Paul

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3
Comment: "PGP Signed for *MY* Protection"

iQA/AwUBQFVeeXgWL0L/UrsnEQIoyQCghtmVPgs5WeeYhAJWxNB/ZN5N6/IAoMBS
oVO7kjMOLIJSqVo+3t23u86n
=WyUa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Macro help!

[Zygmunt Wereszczynski]

On Monday, March 15, 2004, at 23:04:43 [UTC-0800] (Monday, March 15,
2004 08:04 my local time) Grimnir wrote:

> I have this account set up to PGP sign everything. But I have one company
> I work with that has:

> "[=== ENTER RESPONSE ABOVE THIS LINE WHEN REPLYING ===]"

> But when I do that it bounces because of the PGP signing at the bottom. I
> know I can turn this off in the 'Privacy' settings. But I was wondering if
> there is a macro I could use in a templet?

There are pairs of macros which toggle PGP setting per account. They
are:

%ENCRYPTCOMPLETE / %NOENCRYPTCOMPLETE
%SIGNCOMPLETE / %NOSIGNCOMPLETE

The following macro pairs can also be useful:

%USEPGP / %NOUSEPGP
%PGPMIME / %NOPGPMIME

So, use %NOSIGNCOMPLETE and your message will not be signed.

-- 
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski
(Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows 95 4.0 Build  b)




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Macro help!

[Grimnir]

Hello TBTECH,

I have this account set up to PGP sign everything. But I have one company
I work with that has:

"[=== ENTER RESPONSE ABOVE THIS LINE WHEN REPLYING ===]"

But when I do that it bounces because of the PGP signing at the bottom. I
know I can turn this off in the 'Privacy' settings. But I was wondering if
there is a macro I could use in a templet?

Thanks!


I'm using The Bat! Version 2.05 Beta/1
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-- 
Paul


http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: using different smtps

[Colin Wilson]

Hello K,

>> CW> Any thoughts ? Is it already available as an option that I
>> missed ? Yes, insert the %Account=  macro in all of your templates.
KS> Sorry, I didn't get this. What exactly am I to do?

There you go, its NOT just me who might find this useful :-)

Go to each account in your list - right click / properties

Under templates / reply, add this as the first line...

%account="Pipex"

...if the reply account you want to use is called "Pipex" - rename as
appropriate

Rather than having to do this for all email addresses though, wouldn`t
it perhaps be a little more friendly (and sensible) to have a "use
this account for all replies" option ? - I didn`t know about how to
use the macros, and I doubt the majority of users even know they
exist.

-- Best regards, Colin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: using different smtps

[Dierk Haasis]

Hello K!

On Sunday, March 14, 2004 at 5:14:39 PM you wrote:

>> Yes, insert the %Account=  macro in all of your templates.

> Sorry, I didn't get this. What exactly am I to do?

Exactly what is written above: Open the template you want to edit
(i.e. account templates) and add the line "%ACCOUNT=[put in desired
account name]", where the part in parenthesis is a placeholder for
your desired account's name. Leave out the inverted commas.




-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1

A person who smiles in the face of adversity probably has a scapegoat.
(Derek Leveret)






http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: using different smtps

[Colin Wilson]

Hello Peter,

CW>> I have a feeling that`s a function a lot of people would find
CW>> useful, as many of us who`ve been on the net for a number of
CW>> years have multiple accounts but can only send from their present
CW>> ISP.
PP> So why not setting all SMTP servers in all accounts to the one of
PP> your ISP if you're only allowed to send using this one SMTP
PP> server?

Funnily enough, that`s one thing i`d never thought of...

-- 
Best regards,
 Colinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: using different smtps

[K Shantanu]

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Roelof Otten wrote:
> Hallo Colin,
> 
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:32:30 +GMT (13-3-04, 12:32 +0100, where I
> live), you wrote:
> 
> CW> Any thoughts ? Is it already available as an option that I missed ?
> 
> Yes, insert the %Account=  macro in all of your templates.

Sorry, I didn't get this. What exactly am I to do?

Shantanu



http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: using different smtps

[Dierk Haasis]

Hello Peter!

On Sunday, March 14, 2004 at 4:52:53 PM you wrote:

> difference would be POP3 settings). This way one would have a kind of
> POP3 collector, (nearly) fixed to one outgoing e-mail address.

What about using ones own (software) server?



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1

I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it. (Groucho
Marx)






http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: using different smtps

[Peter Palmreuther]

Hello Colin,

On Saturday, March 13, 2004 at 12:32:30 PM you [CW] wrote (at least in
part):

CW> I have a feeling that`s a function a lot of people would find useful,
CW> as many of us who`ve been on the net for a number of years have
CW> multiple accounts but can only send from their present ISP.

So why not setting all SMTP servers in all accounts to the one of
your ISP if you're only allowed to send using this one SMTP server?

BTW: No, I don't think this hits "lots of people", in fact I get the
impression it's a decreasing number of people allowed to send only
using their ISP but having account spread all over the world.
As additionally there is a relative easy solution: adding
'%ACCOUNT="..."' to each's account global templates I don't really see
the need for a 'Always use this account for every new mail or reply,
no matter which account is is created from' option. This can easily
achieved by entering the same SMTP settings for all account (as
suggested) and if the address should be the same all the time by
setting all account to same e-mail address as well (so the only
difference would be POP3 settings). This way one would have a kind of
POP3 collector, (nearly) fixed to one outgoing e-mail address.
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuther
(The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1)

"It took no computation to dance to the rock 'n roll station." -- VU




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Gmane does NOT recognize "X-No-Archive: Yes"

[Kevin Coates]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Greg,

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:54:30 -0600 (9:54 PM here), Greg Strong [GS]
wrote in :

GS> Why does Gmane NOT recognize the "X-No-Archive: Yes" header?

GS> According to Allie and Marck Gmane should NOT be archiving my
GS> messages. Apparently something is wrong here. Please explain!

The way I interpret Gmane's instructions are as follows:

X-No-Archive: yes   (message will expire after 14 days  )
Archive: no (message will expire after 14 days  )
X-Archive: expiry=7 (message will expire after  7 days  )
X-Archive: expiry=0 (Gmane will not store message at all)

I think the last action is what you are looking for. All of this is
documented here:

http://gmane.org/expiry.php

If my understanding is inaccurate, someone please correct me.

- --
Kevin Coates
Dewitt, NY USA

Using TB! v2.05 Beta/1 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP1

(see kludges for my pgp key)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQFAVGtPvZSrVDqOXK0RAnMPAKCwtwwTeW5EuwsVz8st0FTFMrqm1ACfSP5W
8Iky1v13kOYItL1T06I2MKY=
=wPB2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html