Re: Gmane does NOT recognize X-No-Archive: Yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:54:30 -0600 (9:54 PM here), Greg Strong [GS] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: GS Why does Gmane NOT recognize the X-No-Archive: Yes header? GS According to Allie and Marck Gmane should NOT be archiving my GS messages. Apparently something is wrong here. Please explain! The way I interpret Gmane's instructions are as follows: X-No-Archive: yes (message will expire after 14 days ) Archive: no (message will expire after 14 days ) X-Archive: expiry=7 (message will expire after 7 days ) X-Archive: expiry=0 (Gmane will not store message at all) I think the last action is what you are looking for. All of this is documented here: http://gmane.org/expiry.php If my understanding is inaccurate, someone please correct me. - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v2.05 Beta/1 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP1 (see kludges for my pgp key) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFAVGtPvZSrVDqOXK0RAnMPAKCwtwwTeW5EuwsVz8st0FTFMrqm1ACfSP5W 8Iky1v13kOYItL1T06I2MKY= =wPB2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: using different smtps
Hello Colin, On Saturday, March 13, 2004 at 12:32:30 PM you [CW] wrote (at least in part): CW I have a feeling that`s a function a lot of people would find useful, CW as many of us who`ve been on the net for a number of years have CW multiple accounts but can only send from their present ISP. So why not setting all SMTP servers in all accounts to the one of your ISP if you're only allowed to send using this one SMTP server? BTW: No, I don't think this hits lots of people, in fact I get the impression it's a decreasing number of people allowed to send only using their ISP but having account spread all over the world. As additionally there is a relative easy solution: adding '%ACCOUNT=...' to each's account global templates I don't really see the need for a 'Always use this account for every new mail or reply, no matter which account is is created from' option. This can easily achieved by entering the same SMTP settings for all account (as suggested) and if the address should be the same all the time by setting all account to same e-mail address as well (so the only difference would be POP3 settings). This way one would have a kind of POP3 collector, (nearly) fixed to one outgoing e-mail address. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) It took no computation to dance to the rock 'n roll station. -- VU http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: using different smtps
Hello Peter! On Sunday, March 14, 2004 at 4:52:53 PM you wrote: difference would be POP3 settings). This way one would have a kind of POP3 collector, (nearly) fixed to one outgoing e-mail address. What about using ones own (software) server? -- Dierk Haasis The Bat 2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it. (Groucho Marx) http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: using different smtps
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Roelof Otten wrote: Hallo Colin, On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:32:30 +GMT (13-3-04, 12:32 +0100, where I live), you wrote: CW Any thoughts ? Is it already available as an option that I missed ? Yes, insert the %Account= macro in all of your templates. Sorry, I didn't get this. What exactly am I to do? Shantanu http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: using different smtps
Hello Peter, CW I have a feeling that`s a function a lot of people would find CW useful, as many of us who`ve been on the net for a number of CW years have multiple accounts but can only send from their present CW ISP. PP So why not setting all SMTP servers in all accounts to the one of PP your ISP if you're only allowed to send using this one SMTP PP server? Funnily enough, that`s one thing i`d never thought of... -- Best regards, Colinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: using different smtps
Hello K! On Sunday, March 14, 2004 at 5:14:39 PM you wrote: Yes, insert the %Account= macro in all of your templates. Sorry, I didn't get this. What exactly am I to do? Exactly what is written above: Open the template you want to edit (i.e. account templates) and add the line %ACCOUNT=[put in desired account name], where the part in parenthesis is a placeholder for your desired account's name. Leave out the inverted commas. -- Dierk Haasis The Bat 2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 A person who smiles in the face of adversity probably has a scapegoat. (Derek Leveret) http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Macro help!
Hello TBTECH, I have this account set up to PGP sign everything. But I have one company I work with that has: [=== ENTER RESPONSE ABOVE THIS LINE WHEN REPLYING ===] But when I do that it bounces because of the PGP signing at the bottom. I know I can turn this off in the 'Privacy' settings. But I was wondering if there is a macro I could use in a templet? Thanks! I'm using The Bat! Version 2.05 Beta/1 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 -- Paul http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Macro help!
On Monday, March 15, 2004, at 23:04:43 [UTC-0800] (Monday, March 15, 2004 08:04 my local time) Grimnir wrote: I have this account set up to PGP sign everything. But I have one company I work with that has: [=== ENTER RESPONSE ABOVE THIS LINE WHEN REPLYING ===] But when I do that it bounces because of the PGP signing at the bottom. I know I can turn this off in the 'Privacy' settings. But I was wondering if there is a macro I could use in a templet? There are pairs of macros which toggle PGP setting per account. They are: %ENCRYPTCOMPLETE / %NOENCRYPTCOMPLETE %SIGNCOMPLETE / %NOSIGNCOMPLETE The following macro pairs can also be useful: %USEPGP / %NOUSEPGP %PGPMIME / %NOPGPMIME So, use %NOSIGNCOMPLETE and your message will not be signed. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows 95 4.0 Build b) http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Macro help!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TBTECH, Z On Monday, March 15, 2004, at 23:04:43 [UTC-0800] (Monday, March 15, Z 2004 08:04 my local time) Grimnir wrote: Z The following macro pairs can also be useful: Z %USEPGP / %NOUSEPGP %PGPMIME / %NOPGPMIME Z So, use %NOSIGNCOMPLETE and your message will not be signed. Works great Thanks again. I'm using The Bat! Version 2.05 Beta/1 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 - -- Paul -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: PGP Signed for *MY* Protection iQA/AwUBQFVeeXgWL0L/UrsnEQIoyQCghtmVPgs5WeeYhAJWxNB/ZN5N6/IAoMBS oVO7kjMOLIJSqVo+3t23u86n =WyUa -END PGP SIGNATURE- http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
