Re: Automatic zipping of attachments

2004-09-21 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello TBTECH,

on Tue, 21. Sep 2004 at 09:57:26 +0100 Foster, Graham wrote:

> Isn't there a Python plugin already which might be able to handle
> this??

see http://kaishaku.org/software/tbpyxie/

A really great plugin which allows executing Python code in templates (I
use it quite a lot in my centric template setup and it was the reason to
explore the Python programming experience).

You could parse the list of attachments, zip them and generate a new
message, but it probably needs a manual filter to create a new message
where the zip gets attached.

Unfortunately the plugin author moved over to Becky and the plugin is
not available for download anymore.
You can make a donation and if it reaches 70 USD the source will be
released under GPL.

What a pity.. it's a great plugin and a big loss of a plugin author.
Simply because the TB plugin system did not seem to get any development
attention for a long time now and the Becky plugin API seems to provide
much more flexibility.


-- 
shinE!
GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc
ICQ#152282665
Random software tip: [***] The Bat! - EMail client
(http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/)

Lifted with The Bat! 2.12.03 on Windows XP Service Pack 2.




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP and GNUpg

2004-09-21 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Barry,

on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:17:19 +0100GMT, you wrote:


MDP>> Why not even more simply use GnuPG with TB (as I - and others - do)?
MDP>> The only conflict is having to cross-load PGP keys between PGP and
MDP>> GnuPG's keyrings. Not so much a conflict as an overhead and a chore.

BJ> Well i would Marck but I've gone and purchased PGP now so it would
BJ> seem like wasting money if i don't use it

You can still use it for PGP disk, so the money is not completely
waisted... ;-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.0.0.16, on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM






http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: PGP and GNUpg

2004-09-21 Thread Barry Jones
Hello Marck,

Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 11:07:40 AM, you wrote:



MDP> They won't conflict per-se.

MDP> Why not even more simply use GnuPG with TB (as I - and others - do)?
MDP> The only conflict is having to cross-load PGP keys between PGP and
MDP> GnuPG's keyrings. Not so much a conflict as an overhead and a chore.

Well i would Marck but I've gone and purchased PGP now so it would
seem like wasting money if i don't use it




--
Best regards,  Barry




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP and GNUpg

2004-09-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Barry,

@21-Sep-2004, 07:12 Barry Jones [BJ] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbtech:

BJ>   Can you use PGP and GNUpg on the same computer I'm just starting out
BJ>  using PGP with TB but i also use Mulberry which uses GNUpg. Just
BJ>  wondering  if they would conflict

They won't conflict per-se.

Why not even more simply use GnuPG with TB (as I - and others - do)?
The only conflict is having to cross-load PGP keys between PGP and
GnuPG's keyrings. Not so much a conflict as an overhead and a chore.

- --
Cheers --  //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v3.0.0.16 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFBT/1tOeQkq5KdzaARAo0MAKDa8S2VLzkgOyVPkOcHX9wK92wBHwCgkwfJ
pIvSHDLWo6IhWESgVpWFQc8=
=jNv/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Mod: Cut mark (was: Automatic zipping of attachments)

2004-09-21 Thread Roelof Otten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hallo Graham,

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:57:26 +0100GMT (21-9-2004, 10:57 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

FG> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Graham.

  )<)))'>

Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists
of a , i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line.
This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without
the signature and list footers since everything below and including
the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting.

You can easily automate this process by including the sig delimiter in
your templates.

Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make any
difference to whether or not you need a cut mark. You are being
courteous to other readers since at least three lines of text is added
to your signature by the list server.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.


- --
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 3.0.0.16
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its 
affiliated companies.

iQA/AwUBQU/g5CPJPrS9BUUdEQK5mQCfQm3hDrbYNjX4rrtsCSA9e2T0q6QAoNS5
E+e8GjqV7ijaHKEIEKGzo0tq
=VRO+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Automatic zipping of attachments

2004-09-21 Thread Foster, Graham
Hello Graham
>> No. Can't be done.
> Oh well... saves me some time thinking about it I suppose.
> I could add it to the TB Wish list :-)

Well I have added it to the wishes list. but.. As TB! has a plugin
interface, which is used for outgoing messages by Av scanners - could
a plugin be built to also do this automatic zipping?

To accomodate Roelof's comment- there might also need to be a "don't
send ZIP attachments to these people" option too.

Where do you get the documentation for plugin's? Isn't there a Python
plugin already which might be able to handle this??

Regards
 Graham




--
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of 
Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or 
its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck 
Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary 
copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity named on this message.  If you are not the intended recipient, 
and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail 
and then delete it from your system.
--



http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html