Re: My filter stopped working

2005-12-28 Thread Britt Malka 
Hi Roelof,
 
Wednesday, December 28, 2005 at 7:14:03 PM you wrote:


> In that case it might help to change the macro for this:

> %SetHeader('To','"%SetPattRegExp=_(?is)(.*?)E-mail:\s(.*?)\s(.*?)Fornavn(.{3})(.*?)\nEfternavn(.{3})(.*?)\n_%-
> %RegExpBlindMatch=_%Text_%-
> %SubPatt=_5_ %SubPatt=_7_" <%SubPatt=_2_>')%-

Wow! That did it! Perfect. Thank you so much.

-- 

Kind regards,

Britt Malka


... Could I speak to the drug dealer of the house, please?

www.powermediamaker.com




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: My filter stopped working

2005-12-28 Thread Britt Malka 
Hi Miguel,
 
Wednesday, December 28, 2005 at 4:56:20 PM you wrote:

> Your problem may have something to do with this BT report:

Seems to be that, yes. Thank you.

-- 

Kind regards,

Britt Malka


... Oh, I'm sorry. Did I break your concentration?
www.tips-og-tricks.com




http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: My filter stopped working

2005-12-28 Thread Roelof Otten 
Hallo Miguel,

On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:56:20 +0100GMT (28-12-2005, 16:56 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:

>> The message is created, but with no "To"-person.
M> Your problem may have something to do with this BT report:
M> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4933

In that case it might help to change the macro for this:

%SetHeader('To','"%SetPattRegExp=_(?is)(.*?)E-mail:\s(.*?)\s(.*?)Fornavn(.{3})(.*?)\nEfternavn(.{3})(.*?)\n_%-
%RegExpBlindMatch=_%Text_%-
%SubPatt=_5_ %SubPatt=_7_" <%SubPatt=_2_>')%-

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Wizard's Guild Parking Only: Violators will be Toad.

The Bat! 3.64.01 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: My filter stopped working

2005-12-28 Thread Miguel A. Urech 
Hello Britt,


>> What's not working in the filter? Is the message created by the regexp
>> in the template (I guess that the regexp is from a template for an
>> automatic reply) garbled or doesn't the filter get triggered by the
>> message?
>
> Oh, I'm sorry for my bad explications.
>
> The message is created, but with no "To"-person.

Your problem may have something to do with this BT report:

https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4933

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition





http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html