Re: envelope-to header

2000-11-12 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Vincent,

On 12 November 2000 at 06:32:14 GMT +0100 (which was 05:32 where I
live) Vincent - D. Ertner wrote and made these points:

VDE who creates an envelope-to header? I try to configure a program,
VDE which needs this header - but obviously doesn't get one, if I'm
VDE sending mail in ... any ideas?

Not  sure  what  you  mean by this. The SMTP RCPT TO is taken from the
"To:"  address  line. The SMTP FROM envelope is taken from the "From:"
address.  What  is  an "envelope-to" header? Is it a special x-header?
can  you  use  X-Ray  to  add  it in (I forget the URL but it's in the
archive somewhere)?

- --
Cheers,
.\\arck
 
[Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  ]
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[ PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY ]

 No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway
 
 TB! v1.48 Beta/4 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOg5ywznkJKuSnc2gEQJs5QCg+6eGdoXYAYkMnNVOPDNxw/Az7asAoLT6
Ainm2q2Zz2g9JCofVj+B/yHg
=0w9U
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: envelope-to header

2000-11-12 Thread Mike Zanker

At 10:36 12/11/2000, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:

 Not  sure  what  you  mean by this. The SMTP RCPT TO is taken from the
 "To:"  address  line. The SMTP FROM envelope is taken from the "From:"
 address.  What  is  an "envelope-to" header? Is it a special x-header?
 can  you  use  X-Ray  to  add  it in (I forget the URL but it's in the
 archive somewhere)?

Envelope-To: is often added by the final MTA in the delivery process.
It is taken from the final SMTP RCPT TO.

Regards,

Mike
-- 
Mike Zanker   | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Northampton   | 
United Kingdom| PGP Public Key available


.
-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Trying to make a anti-spam filter in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 11 Nov 2000 20:08:19 -0800, Ming-Li thoughtfully wrote
the following:

ML If TB provides a "bozo bin" as Gravity or XNews do, or at allow AB
ML entries or filter items to expire after certain days as Agent does,
ML filtering spammers directly would be much easier and more practical.

The bozo bin principle will work with newsreading because 'bozos' are
posters, whose messages you wish not to read. They aren't spammers so
they use a fixed address . although mind you there are some
professional bozos who tend to change their addresses.

ML That's bound to be more often. They haven't done it often because
ML they are sending identical messages to a bunch of addresses. Since
ML they don't want you to know who else are among the recipients, they
ML resort to the BCC trick. With Word (or other word processors), MAPI,
ML and mail-merge, sophisticated spammers have begun to use
ML personalized spam. Since you're the only recipient of a particular
ML message, they don't shy from putting your name in the To field.
ML That's why I miss the bozo bin so much.

Don't these spammers change their addresses and sources for each spam
message that they send?

 though I'll attempt to do a traceroute on the source and if
 successful send a complaint to the relevant ISP.

ML That's nice, but time is a scarce resource. :(

It's really not that bad when I use Neotrace and TB!'s templates. I
created a complaint template. I then look in the Kludges and run a trace
on the DNS address from which the message originated. 50% of the times
I'll find the ISP. I then copy the ISP info from Neotrace, include it in
the spam complaint and send the message to them. This all takes about
10-15secs per message. I do other things while Neotrace does its thing
so I don't count the traceroute time.

- --
A. Curtis Martin  |  Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

"Even a hawk is an eagle among crows. "
_
TB! v1.48 Beta/4 (S/N CCA4F9B8)
Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender verification.

iQA/AwUBOg6IqfAXeSHuB5k3EQIFBwCeNsaUcKXZ8fUeJV4RD9/iYJ181j0AoO1e
K/TGNXq4o09LFqNjkkNKwriJ
=m6HD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: envelope-to header

2000-11-12 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 10:36:51 +, Marck D. Pearlstone graced us with
these comments:

[..]
MDP Not sure what you mean by this. The SMTP RCPT TO is taken from the
MDP "To:" address line. The SMTP FROM envelope is taken from the
MDP "From:" address. What is an "envelope-to" header? Is it a special
MDP x-header? can you use X-Ray to add it in (I forget the URL but it's
MDP in the archive somewhere)?

The link to X-Ray is http://xraysoft.cjb.net/

- --
A. Curtis Martin  |  Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity. "
_
TB! v1.48 Beta/4 (S/N CCA4F9B8)
Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender verification.

iQA/AwUBOg6J3fAXeSHuB5k3EQKS7ACgt/s7URvMNzX0TabQSlfR6jq7C2MAnAmG
BUF3g/qn1qeFeW54/YGJFsr/
=rAd7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Trying to make a anti-spam filter in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi A. Curtis,

  On  Sunday, November 12, 2000 @ 07:10:10 -0500 you
  wrote the following in regards to Trying to make a
  "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!:

A. Curtis I  use  Neotrace and TB!'s templates. I created a
A. Curtis complaint  template.  I  then look in the Kludges
A. Curtis and run a trace on the DNS address from which the
A. Curtis message  originated.  50%  of the times I'll find
A. Curtis the  ISP. I then copy the ISP info from Neotrace,
A. Curtis include  it  in  the  spam complaint and send the
A. Curtis message  to  them. This all takes about 10-15secs
A. Curtis per  message.

  If  this is off topic I will be happy to take this
  off  list  but I'd be interested in knowing how to
  automate a spam response.

- --
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D
And TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOg6eEpccVS5MnN+dEQKMIACgoAqywwOkQvKts6zl6VcRJpC73vYAnRxu
FzX2LHFj/petPhVXL3M1Ko5V
=z9JX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Choose template on the basis of language

2000-11-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ming-Li,

On Saturday, November 11, 2000 @ 19:43:25 -0800, you
wrote  the  following  about "Choose template on the
basis of language"


Ming-Li other  useful  keyboard shortcuts, and you can find
Ming-Li them at:
Ming-Li http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/shortcut.eng.txt

This link is not working for me, Ming-Li.

- --
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D
And TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOg6jupccVS5MnN+dEQKdWACfZTuVtA/PoBSH5RRH2FwJGzZ6SYQAn2Ty
ipJnMgOTtgf745/1hB6HrSmk
=Gjyj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Trying to make a anti-spam filter in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread Ming-Li

On Sunday, November 12, 2000, 4:10:10 AM, A. wrote:

ML If TB provides a "bozo bin" as Gravity or XNews do, or at allow
ML AB entries or filter items to expire after certain days as
ML Agent does, filtering spammers directly would be much easier
ML and more practical.

 The bozo bin principle will work with newsreading because 'bozos'
 are posters, whose messages you wish not to read. They aren't
 spammers so they use a fixed address . although mind you there
 are some professional bozos who tend to change their addresses.

I want a bozo bin exactly because spammers (email or newsgrouop ones
alike) change their addresses often, for a well-implemented bozo bin
lets you decide when a blocked/killed address should expire. With
TB's address book, we can use the group feature to create a bozo bin
for ourselves, but address added to it won't expire. This isn't very
useful and would eventually slow down the system since it's checking
against a long list of spammer addresses that's no longer in use.

ML With Word (or other word processors), MAPI, and mail-merge,
ML sophisticated spammers have begun to use personalized spam.
ML Since you're the only recipient of a particular message, they
ML don't shy from putting your name in the To field. That's why I
ML miss the bozo bin so much.

 Don't these spammers change their addresses and sources for each spam
 message that they send?

They do, but they may not be changing that often. That's why an
expiration period is important.

 It's really not that bad when I use Neotrace and TB!'s templates.
 I created a complaint template. I then look in the Kludges and run
 a trace on the DNS address from which the message originated. 50%
 of the times I'll find the ISP. I then copy the ISP info from
 Neotrace, include it in the spam complaint and send the message to
 them. This all takes about 10-15secs per message. I do other
 things while Neotrace does its thing so I don't count the
 traceroute time.

All I have to do is just forward the spam message to our Anti-Spam
Team, and they'll do the tracing and filing complaints. If
complaints don't work, they can block it. Nice, isn't it? :)

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/4 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Choose template on the basis of language

2000-11-12 Thread Ming-Li

On Sunday, November 12, 2000, 6:05:35 AM, Jan wrote:

Ming-Li other  useful  keyboard shortcuts, and you can find them
Ming-Li at: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/shortcut.eng.txt

 This link is not working for me, Ming-Li.

Really? Just tried, and it works. Or try this:

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/

which is the FAQ site. You'll find the shortcut list there.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/4 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Trying to make a anti-spam filter in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12 November, 2000, 10:24 AM, I saw Ming-Li's comments made on
 Sun, 12 Nov 2000 06:57:33 -0800, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:

ML I want a bozo bin exactly because spammers (email or newsgrouop ones
ML alike) change their addresses often, for a well-implemented bozo bin
ML lets you decide when a blocked/killed address should expire. [..]

Aaahh! That, I didn't know. :-)

ML They do, but they may not be changing that often. That's why an
ML expiration period is important.

True.

ML All I have to do is just forward the spam message to our Anti-Spam
ML Team, and they'll do the tracing and filing complaints. If
ML complaints don't work, they can block it. Nice, isn't it? :)

Yeah. I wish I had such a team to forward my tons of spam to. It would
appear that my ISP doesn't implement any antispam measures. I really get
a lot. Up to 6 spam messages per day.

- --
A. Curtis Martin  |  Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

"A pessimist is never disappointed. "
_
TB! v1.48 Beta/4 (S/N CCA4F9B8) | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender verification.

iQA/AwUBOg62pvAXeSHuB5k3EQKWmACbB15OTO2P4RnWQtQsAM0azNl6qw4AnAz2
0otiMSjVpNTX3K3Mot0BZIgq
=MBvp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Choose template on the basis of language

2000-11-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ming-Li,

On  Sunday,  November 12, 2000 @ 06:45:36 -0800, you
wrote  the  following  about "Choose template on the
basis of language"


Ming-Li  http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/shortcut.eng.txt
 This link is not working for me, Ming-Li.
Ming-Li Really? Just tried, and it works. Or try this:
Ming-Li http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/

Apologies,  Ming-Li.  My  new anti-virus program was
blocking  the browser. Your original link works just
fine.

- --
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D
And TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOg65UpccVS5MnN+dEQLdnwCgkKggbbVR0cHljm+89zc3lfvWN80AnigY
e6rsGGZuvkcRUpoPGhQVVzSm
=buRF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: macro dumping *just* eGroups ads

2000-11-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Marck,

  On  Friday, November 10, 2000 @ 14:15:01 + you
  wrote  the  following  in regards to macro dumping
  *just* eGroups ads:

Marck [...]  This  is the wrong macro. [...] Your situation
Marck is  the  opposite - banner ads and no PGP. You should
Marck be  using  the macro which precedes it on the page as
Marck follows:

Marck   %quotes="%SETPATTREGEXP=""(?is)(^-BEGIN   PGP 
SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?(.*?)(^(-*?\s*?--\s*\n|_{40,}\s*\n|-BEGIN PGP 
SIGNATURE.*s?\n|-+\s*eGroups.*~-~.*-*_-)|\z)""%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=""%text""%SUBPATT=""3"""

  Sorry  not  to  have responded sooner, Marck as it
  appears  your  email slipped by me for some reason
  yet  tbd.  Yes,  thank you, I was definitely using
  the  wrong  macro  while  the correct macro cleans
  things up perfectly.

- --
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D
And TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOg6845ccVS5MnN+dEQLlMgCfVGQ+fMR0QN2eH02S7QtDezZ9OJcAnRUz
pPFDtCaniLrpcMnw/43peZIs
=Hdtf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Alexander Turcic

Hi,
I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the
mailbox files.
The password feature to secure access to a mailbox is well meant, but
it is more or less useless if anyone with access to the .tbb files can
read those using any ASCII editor.

--
Best regards,
 Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Alexander Levenetz

Hi,


 I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the
 mailbox files.

Good question, I would be interested in that myself.

And my additional question is if there is/will be a way to encrypt
(only) folders in an account (instead or even in addition of the
account)?

Thanks,

Alexander

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Trying to make a anti-spam filter in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread Dean

 Hello Ming-Li,

 Saturday, November 11, 2000, 9:56:02 PM, you wrote:
  :
 M On Saturday, November 11, 2000, 12:30:45 PM, Dean wrote:

M Personally, I don't use any spam filter, for I've got very few
M so far. :)

 I believe you'll find there's a reason behind that, the $ fine for
 spamming a .edu is quite high, much higher than any of us other
 folks, if memory serves me correct;)
 
M Fine? By whom? I've never heard of that. Could you provide more
M information? I would be happy to learn about it. I checked relevant
M web sites of our university and couldn't find anything about fining
M spammers. In fact, our University Network Security Team says the
M last resort is to block traffic from certain IP address or subnet.
M We do have a diligent University Anti-Spam Team, though, which
M handles spam complaints swiftly.


 http://www.jmls.edu/cyber/statutes/email/hr4124.html(2) RELIEF FOR INDIVIDUALS-

'(A) In an action under this section for violation of
subsection (b), relief shall be sought in an action brought by
the attorney general of one or more states.Please read on
so as to not bore the rest of the folks.

http://www.jmls.edu/cyber/statutes/email/caab1629.html

http://www.suespammers.org/resources.shtml,
http://www.suespammers.org/ca/lawindex.shtml

I'm still looking for the specific CA law regarding .edu ... it is
burried in with the fax laws and CAUCE.  I believe around 1996/7.
As I said if memory serves me...  I will publish the results, when
I have time on TBOT :)   Besides, a young inquisitive person such
as yourself, if really interested could find it much faster than I
The laws came out when I was still at a .edu myself, that is why I
remember what little I do.

 -- 
 Thanks,
  Dean 
 The Bat1.48 Beta/4 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re:Trying to make a anti-spam filter in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread Assad Toorab

Hello Curtis,

On  12 November 2000, A . Curtis Martin wrote and made these points on
the subject of "Trying to make a "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!":

ACM Yeah.  I wish I had such a team to forward my tons of spam to. It
ACM would appear that my ISP doesn't implement any antispam measures.
ACM I really get a lot. Up to 6 spam messages per day.

 Try  http://SpamCop.net.  They analyse spams in an expert fashion
 and  report them to the appropriate ISPs within seconds. Great in
 my opinion.

-- 
Best regards,
 Assad


Using The Bat! 1.48 Beta/6 
under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Karin Spaink

On 12-11-2000 at 22:59, Januk Aggarwal kindly wrote:
 Alexander Turcic typed:

 I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the
 mailbox files.

 No.  TB used to use some encryption, but that was very weak, so they
 removed all encryption.  It is now up to the user to get a 3rd party
 program to encrypt their data.  Some other members have said that
 PGPDisk works well for them.  I have not used it myself.

I use PGP disk and it works excellently. Previously, I used
Securedisk; that also worked fine (but can't co-operate with
WinNT, and is restricted to 0,5 GB. Version 1.4d can
supposedly manage 2 GB, but I haven't tried it.)



- K -

-- 

"The feeling you had when you first played these old 
computer games as a ten year old down in the basement during 
the summer, back in the days that you knew it all and while 
your friends were hanging around at the pool you'd be saving 
the galaxy!"   - Menso on HfH, 1999-10-16 
"Oh, eh, thanks for saving the galaxy, by the way. You did a 
great job, Menso."   - Marcel on HfH, 1999-10-16



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Manfred Ell

On 12-11-2000 at 23:24:22GMT +0100 (which was 22:24 where I live)
Karin Spaink wrote regarding the subject of " Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes? "

 On 12-11-2000 at 22:59, Januk Aggarwal kindly wrote:
 Alexander Turcic typed:

 I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the
 mailbox files.

 No.  TB used to use some encryption, but that was very weak, so they
 removed all encryption.  It is now up to the user to get a 3rd party
 program to encrypt their data.  Some other members have said that
 PGPDisk works well for them.  I have not used it myself.

 I use PGP disk and it works excellently. Previously, I used
 Securedisk; that also worked fine (but can't co-operate with
 WinNT, and is restricted to 0,5 GB. Version 1.4d can
 supposedly manage 2 GB, but I haven't tried it.)



 - K -


Hello Karin,

I can heartily recommend BestCrypt. It works perfectly in Win95/98/NT/2000
and Linux.

http://www.jetico.sci.fi/



Regards

-- 
Manfred Ell

using TheBat 1.48 Beta/6 on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Mark Aston

Hi Alexander,

Sunday, November 12, 2000, 4:24:59 PM, you wrote:

AT I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the
AT mailbox files.
AT The password feature to secure access to a mailbox is well meant, but
AT it is more or less useless if anyone with access to the .tbb files can
AT read those using any ASCII editor.

Better to stick to plain text Unix style mail boxes, at least if
things go wrong you have a reasonable chance of recovering your mail,
if an encrypted M$ style mail box gets corrupted you lose the lot.

If someone has access to your PC there is no *real* security with any
system.

-- 

Mark Aston   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


http://www.gunfleet.com
http://www.gunfleet.com/LinuxGuide



Using The Bat! 1.48 Beta/6
Under Windows NT 5 0 Service Pack 1 2195

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Sorting by Subject AND Date

2000-11-12 Thread Lynn Kucera

Hello TBUDL,

I've only been using The Bat! for about 3 weeks now and I've been
looking in the Help file and I have looking under Dates and Sorting in
the FAQ but I can't seem to find any reference if you can sort the
messages in your individual mail folders by first the Subject and
second by Date. This way on some of my mailing lists the original
email message would stay at the top of the thread not somewhere in the
middle.

-- 
Thanks,
 Lynn  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Sorting by Subject AND Date

2000-11-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hi Lynn,

On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 23:24:15 -0600GMT (13/11/2000, 13:24 +0800GMT),
Lynn Kucera wrote:

LK I've only been using The Bat! for about 3 weeks now and I've been
LK looking in the Help file and I have looking under Dates and Sorting in
LK the FAQ but I can't seem to find any reference if you can sort the
LK messages in your individual mail folders by first the Subject and
LK second by Date. This way on some of my mailing lists the original
LK email message would stay at the top of the thread not somewhere in the
LK middle.

If you only sort by subject, wouldn't the mails with the same subject
automatically be sorted in the order they arrived?

Another way you might want to try is threading by subject. In the
message list menu, use View / View Threads by... Depending on whether
the members of the mailing lists use a decnet email client, threading
by reference might even be better than by subject. Try it out.

HTH.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.47 Halloween Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Alexander Turcic

Hello Januk,

Sunday, November 12, 2000, 10:59:40 PM, you wrote:

JA No.  TB used to use some encryption, but that was very weak, so they
JA removed all encryption.  It is now up to the user to get a 3rd party
JA program to encrypt their data.  Some other members have said that
JA PGPDisk works well for them.  I have not used it myself.

Well, I don't think that this is the appropriate solution. I am myself
a cryptology freak and it is more than easy to implement a secure
block cipher in CBC mode like Rijndael or Serpent. Dr. Brian Gladman
published optimized implementation sources as public domain on his
page
(www.http://www.btinternet.com/~brian.gladman/cryptography_technology/)
I find it a bit drastic to install something like PGPDisk (with all
its drivers) just to encrypt a few mail files.

JA That's exactly right.  It is not meant to be any more secure than the
JA Windows password you enter on Win9x.  It is very easy to work around.
JA The password is only meant to keep casual peepers away, such as
JA coworkers while you're on a coffee break.

Uhm, sorry I have to disagree. It is true that you can break the Win9x
password with relatively little effort, but only because MS did a bad
job in implementing a good (RC4) cipher. .pwl files where well suited
for a known-plaintext attack as the 20 first bytes are completely
predictable. RC4 is a stream cipher, it generates a long pseudo random
stream that it uses to XOR the data byte by byte. This isn't
necessarily weak encryption if you don't use the same stream twice:
however Win9x does, every resource is XORed with the same pseudo
random stream. What's more the 20 first bytes is easy to guess.

JA moderator nag sent by Marck D. Pearlstone on November 10, 2000?  It
JA isn't in the archives yet, but I can send you a copy off list if you
JA like.

well sorry, next time I got that right :)

So please, makers of TB, I know you have a lot on the users' wish
list, but implementing encryption of the mail files should go fairly
quick.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org