Re: REGEXP-Definitions (was: Templates)

2001-01-27 Thread Gerd Ewald

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Januk Aggarwal !


On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:18:28 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 27.01.2001, 07:18 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:

 Perhaps you should try to tackle something a little easier first.

Haha, I started with regex using your example of date-conversion /DD/MM
into MMDD from beginning of January. It doesn't matter with what you
start: all regex are difficult the first time


[SETPATTREGEXP explanation]


JR %REGEXPBLINDMATCH

 That tells TB what text to look at using the regular expression
 defined by %SETPATTREGEXP

CMIIW, as far as I understood the thing

%REGEXPBLINDMATCH is used for replacement with SUBPATT of the matching text

and

%REGEXPMATCH is used to replace with the whole matching text ??

Am I right?

- --
Best regards,
 Gerd
==
Using The Bat! Version 1.49c
PGP-Keys on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_key
- 
Erwerbsregel #8
Nur ein Narr verpasst eine gute Gelegenheit.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for authentication purposes ! Gerd Ewald

iQA/AwUBOnKRKUy/sHrVbGGHEQIchgCglej6S95215FlLN9qx33ILTMGOlAAoMX5
QY3TtOQRFAmdYZZEur45IOyq
=DHBI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Old Bat bug!

2001-01-27 Thread John Phillips


Hi Bat Fans,


The focus in my message list pane shifts unexpectedly to the right
from time to time, and then thinks that this is the default setting.

I seem to remember reading about this here many months ago, and a
promise it would be fixed "real soon now"

If I have a look at another folder, then back to the offending folder,
this problems sometimes seems to be fixed for a while - sometimes not.


What is the latest in fixing this bug?


BTW, what is the macro to reveal my Bat! serial number in the sig.
below?




-- 
TIA  Regards,
John Phillips  Sydney, Australia  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! version 1.49 Windows 98  Build    A 

If Ayn Rand was so smart, how come she couldn't spell? 

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Filtering/Sorting Forwarded and Redirected Messages

2001-01-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Abigail,

On  27  January  2001 at 20:55:43 -0800 (which was 04:55 where I live)
Abigail Marshall wrote and made these points:

AM Ideally, I would want it to be that when I forward a message, the
AM original is sent to a subfolder that says "forwarded messages" - in
AM turn, the subfolder properties would be set to automatically delete
AM messages after a certain time frame.

Well,  how  about  this  idea. It sounds to me like there are a finite
number  of  regular  destinations  for  forward  / redirect. How about
setting  up  a  manual  filter  for  each,  each filter having its own
hotkey.  These  manual  filters  can redirect, forward with a specific
template,  move, delete, do whatever you want in the "Action" section.
Just press the requisite hotkey and you're done.

Would that help?

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]

TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOnKnnjnkJKuSnc2gEQJwlACg6r24z3Giu1W6fTjgn7rRsgIAUOcAoLKs
lToTh1nqOxnFcGDw2MbfNtkN
=AYjO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Filtering Bug (or feature?)

2001-01-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi John,

On  25  January  2001 at 06:47:54 +1100 (which was 19:47 where I live)
John Phillips wrote and made these points:

JP When I receive mail by Bat!, it is sometimes filtered with "Re:"
JP first, then the first message somewhere lower down in the thread.

JP I have tried various "filter by / view by" combinations.

JP How can I fix this?

I  always  view  my  mail  sorted  by  Received  time (descending) and
threaded  by  reference.  This  method will have the least failures, I
think. If you have incoming mail that is subject to random delays then
Created  time  (desc)  may be a better sort order with the caveat that
you are at the mercy of the originator's clock accuracy.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]

TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOnKq+TnkJKuSnc2gEQLaWgCfSp90pPR55ijxE83Pevupi+Lo3kEAn2gR
bxYbZ3JOu67ISFZcVWxDyPdB
=wsnV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Old Bat bug!

2001-01-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi John,

On  27  January  2001 at 21:26:38 +1100 (which was 10:26 where I live)
John Phillips wrote and made these points:

JP The focus in my message list pane shifts unexpectedly to the right
JP from time to time, and then thinks that this is the default
JP setting.

JP I seem to remember reading about this here many months ago, and a
JP promise it would be fixed "real soon now"

JP If I have a look at another folder, then back to the offending
JP folder, this problems sometimes seems to be fixed for a while -
JP sometimes not.

It's  about  the  columns  selected for display being too wide for the
window  and the focus moving to a column which is not fully on screen.
When  this happens, the screen scrolls sideways to accommodate it. The
"fixed  for  a while" phenomenon is about selecting a different column
while  in the other folder and which folders have what columns on show
at what widths.

JP What is the latest in fixing this bug?

AFAIAC  it  is  not  a  bug.  It is by design. To "fix" it you have to
change  your  column  layout,  reducing  the  width of some columns or
omitting some columns completely so that scrolling is avoided.

Having  said  that,  when  you expand threads, the subject column gets
wider and wider until the same horizontal scroll kicks in again.

JP BTW, what is the macro to reveal my Bat! serial number in the sig.
JP below?

%THEBATSERIALNUMBER

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]

TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOnKxNTnkJKuSnc2gEQL2BQCgxdIlDaqiNQjasbQwa3fyQy/N5/4AnRfz
Rhi/2Uzut9MT+34qLVYDltQb
=Kw02
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Moving Folders

2001-01-27 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:14:45 -0800, Januk graced us with these
comments:

AM Focus on the message list. Hit CTRLA, then CTRLv; select the
AM target folder and go.

JA Just add CTRL* before CTRLA so you expand all threads first.
JA Otherwise you get the one layer at a time effect.

Ooops. Yes, that's right. Thanks for the correction. :=)

- --
@~@@~@
 |   A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TB(UDL|BETA|TECH)]   |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@
__
TB! v1.49c | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender and message authentication.

iQA/AwUBOnK1elfJ62ArBxfiEQKTFACg28aTrSV3Uqa6tH/NkaTaCYOBS40AnjRP
vGsaoqNpgYqQi8e1bHPlqFRv
=l3+k
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Filtering/Sorting Forwarded and Redirected Messages

2001-01-27 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 10:49:02 +, Marck contributed this to our
collective wisdom:

AM Ideally, I would want it to be that when I forward a message, the
AM original is sent to a subfolder that says "forwarded messages" -
AM in turn, the subfolder properties would be set to automatically
AM delete messages after a certain time frame.

MDP Well,  how  about  this  idea. It sounds to me like there are a
MDP finite number  of  regular  destinations  for  forward  /
MDP redirect. How about setting  up  a  manual  filter  for  each,
MDP each filter having its own hotkey.

That's a good idea. A single manual filter should do it if a hot key
is being used. You can disable the 'check the selected message against
this rule' option so that the filter rules actions are applied to
*any* message when you hit the hot key.


- --
@~@@~@
 |   A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TB(UDL|BETA|TECH)]   |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@
__
TB! v1.49c | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender and message authentication.

iQA/AwUBOnK4VFfJ62ArBxfiEQKZ4ACeL9vxjLsNalLQP/pbk3ee/igDBtQAoPzO
ZmMFKMOMYnfZpVhvaUzIgAZl
=dUfS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Using a template to strip

2001-01-27 Thread Gerd Ewald

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Januk Aggarwal !


On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:51:34 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 27.01.2001, 07:51 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:

PMFJI, I have a question concerning your regex. As I told in one of my
postings earlier I started to learn regex. So there are some questions
every now and then. Sorry for that!

I divided your regex in parts, which I can and can not explain.

 regexp
 %SETPATTREGEXP=
 "(?is)
What does this mean? Is the meaning of "?" in brackets different? Isn't
this SubPatt1 by definition?

 .*
find any character, occurrence 0-infinity

 (^Credit\s*Card.*?$)
Find any word starting with "Credit", followed by 0-inf. whitespaces,
followed by the word "Card", followed by any character, occurrence 0-inf.
Again the "?" which normally means 0-1 occurrence of the character, but
this doesn't make sense here to me. Definition of  ?All is stored in a
SubPatt .

 .*payment\s*of\s*
This could be explained as the last paragraph; I omit this.

(.*?\n)
Here we are again: "?". At least: it has to be followed by a newline to be
matched.


"%REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%TEXT"%SUBPATT="1"%SUBPATT="2"
Well, obviously the first bracket-pair does not give value for the first
SubPatt. So it has to have a different meaning.

Could you give me a hint? TIA.

If this is too special for this mailing-list (maybe this belongs to
TB-Techie), please let me know. Thanks !


- --
Best regards,
 Gerd
==
Using The Bat! Version 1.49c
PGP-Keys on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_key
- 
I asked Mom if I was a gifted child...
she said they certainly wouldn't have paid for me.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for authentication purposes ! Gerd Ewald

iQA/AwUBOnKvk0y/sHrVbGGHEQIIPQCaA1njz+ZaIYFsbmqedXoSIq4QhsEAoO20
Rwere4vlPb7TejH5xnIhoy2W
=90Yn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Using a template to strip

2001-01-27 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:22:46 +0100, Gerd wrote these words of wisdom:

 ...snip...
GE If this is too special for this mailing-list (maybe this belongs
GE to TB-Techie), please let me know. Thanks !

Aaah! You took the words out of my mouth.

Yes, please move this discussion to TBTECH. It was created for just
this sort of thing. Thanks. :=)

- --
@~@@~@
 |   A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TB(UDL|BETA|TECH)]   |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@
__
TB! v1.49c | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender and message authentication.

iQA/AwUBOnK/HFfJ62ArBxfiEQKrMACg+PI0mydZvuE5rb1cqGWVgm8ZbkwAmQHK
b9bOdBO38ubHBUsOgOqIH2FB
=73SW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.49 - GMX mail servers

2001-01-27 Thread Johannes Posel

Hi there Douglas,

Going back 06:22 27.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts:

 Don't use the above. Use only the following.

Nope, sorry, you're wrong. SMTP AUTH is what he wants to use, and what
he set in his GMX properties on the web site. GMX supports it:

gatekeeper:~ # telnet mail.gmx.net 25
Trying 194.221.183.20...
Connected to mail.gmx.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 GMX Mailservices ESMTP
EHLO pp
250-GMX Mailservices
250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
QUIT
221 GMX Mailservices
Connection closed by foreign host.
gatekeeper:~ # 

Cheers,
 Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Enough research will tend to support your theory.

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Moving Folders

2001-01-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hello Januk,

On Saturday, January 27, 2001 22:14:45 [ -0800 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Moving Folders':

Januk Just add CTRL* before CTRLA so you expand all threads first.
Januk Otherwise you get the one layer at a time effect.

  Because of this I discovered I had re-assigned CTRL-A to another use.
  Its now back where it belongs. Double thanks.

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Using TB! v1.49
ICQ 41116329



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: TB! v1.49 - GMX mail servers

2001-01-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hello Douglas,

On Saturday, January 27, 2001 23:22:48 [ -0600 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - GMX mail servers':

JR POP.GMX.co.uk
JR MAIL.GMX.co.uk

Douglas Both are correct.

JR Authentication:

Douglas Use only the following.

JR Use POP before SMTP authentication

Douglas I forgot to mention that the user should be the number you
Douglas received (remember that you need use pop before smtp).

  Thanks, Douglas. Appreciate the help. I tried everything everyone
  suggested without success. From the gitgo I was able to retrieve msgs
  but never once able to access the GMX SMTP server. I've un-subscribed
  from GMX.

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Using TB! v1.49
ICQ 41116329

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.49 - GMX mail servers

2001-01-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Johannes,

On  27  January  2001 at 14:13:39 +0100 (which was 13:13 where I live)
Johannes Posel wrote and made these points:

This  one  is getting very techy ... please can you move any responses
to TBTECH.

JP Hi there Douglas,

JP Going back 06:22 27.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts:

 Don't use the above. Use only the following.

JP Nope, sorry, you're wrong. SMTP AUTH is what he wants to use, and what
JP he set in his GMX properties on the web site. GMX supports it:

JP gatekeeper:~ # telnet mail.gmx.net 25
JP Trying 194.221.183.20...
JP Connected to mail.gmx.net.
JP Escape character is '^]'.
JP 220 GMX Mailservices ESMTP
JP EHLO pp
JP 250-GMX Mailservices
JP 250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
JP 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
JP 250-PIPELINING
JP 250 8BITMIME
JP QUIT
JP 221 GMX Mailservices
JP Connection closed by foreign host.
JP gatekeeper:~ #

JP Cheers,
JP  Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]

TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOnLXOjnkJKuSnc2gEQJCLQCcCMuBwVImAF7kEv65X5XiBWNv66cAoNlx
9UPRZQx/lIW0kxHfsSEXVmvT
=93od
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





TB! v1.49 - Hot Key Assignments

2001-01-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hello TBUDListers.

  Does anyone know if it is possible to assign a hot key combination to
  to call a Quick Template?

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Using TB! v1.49
ICQ 41116329



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re:TB! v1.49 - Hot Key Assignments

2001-01-27 Thread Gerry Doyon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hello Jan,


Saturday, January 27, 2001, 9:35:24 AM, you wrote:

JR   Does anyone know if it is possible to assign a hot key combination to
JR   to call a Quick Template?

As far as I know, the only "hot key combination" to call up a quick
template is to press the Control + Space bar combination while the cursor
is positioned in from of the quick template name.  Then, TB! automatically
expands your message with the entire template.

That's all I know, sorry.

- --
- - Gerrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Running The Bat! v1.49c (Personal) on Windows 98

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: Digitally Signed.  -  My PGP key ID is: 0x57F28ABC

iQA/AwUBOnLjuBalOqMy8yvQEQJ/dACfQxOfYG8BJslhU38RkQgF1Rnbn+cAnAg1
HSAPcjqdpqBH3bnFkE8N78cx
=XPF9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re:%TOFNAME for more then one address

2001-01-27 Thread Gerry Doyon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hello Shahar

Saturday, January 27, 2001, 7:44:56 AM, you wrote:

SS Hi %TOFNAME.

SS I usually send messages to my favorites by choosing them from the
SS little arrow near the "New message" button.

SS When I choose only one recipient the macro works fine but when I have
SS in the To field more then one address, the Macro show only the first
SS one.

SS What can I do in order to see all my recipients names in the beginning
SS of the message ?

I would be very interested to learn how to do this as well!  Le me know if
you find out how and I will do the same.

Can anyone else in this list give us a hand?




- --
Best regards,

- - Gerrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Running The Bat! v1.49c(Personal) on Windows 98

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: Digitally Signed.  -  My PGP key ID is: 0x57F28ABC

iQA/AwUBOnLqpBalOqMy8yvQEQJvtACeImSDB7+5PhuLvEyIO5T3sklyYbQAoNnE
tH9CDhU7oPyKs05jQ8P5/2XB
=3krQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Bat Bug - temp files?

2001-01-27 Thread ztrader

I noticed there were a very large number of temp files still in my
Win/temp dir. It seems TheBat does not delete them when it is done
using the temp files. No big deal, but does fill up the drive if it
goes on for long.

ztrader

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Same messages?

2001-01-27 Thread Ming-Li

On Thursday, January 25, 2001, 6:13:41 PM, Marck wrote:

 "Aborted"  ... is there a clue there? The server keeps a list of
 UIDLs for  messages  left there. I TB seems to keep the list of
 UIDLs it has seen and grabs any messages with a UIDL which it
 hasn't seen before. I can see this quite clearly in the server
 logs.

Pardon my ignorance, but what is UIDL?

 2. The server didn't record the UIDL because it thought the
 downloadwas incomplete.

I guess it's this part I don't understand. I though the server just
keeps a list of all my messages on the server. And since the only
way to remove a message from the server is by a command from TB,
whether or not a download is complete should not matter, isn't it?

 3. TB didn't record the UIDL because it thought the download was
incomplete.

That's plausible, but then the only dupe I should see is exactly the
one a download is aborted. But my impression is when I see dupes, I
see lots of them. But I'm not sure. As I said, I'll pay more
attention next time. Thanks for your explanation.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.49c | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: OT: Tantrums

2001-01-27 Thread Ming-Li

On Thursday, January 25, 2001, 10:32:00 AM, Marck wrote:

ML BTW, just found that TBTECH is not listed on RIT's support
ML page, though it's listed on the FAQ site. Maybe someone should
ML remind RIT to update the page.

 I don't think TBBETA is listed either ... or is it?

It is, including both the subscription link and archive link. Same
with UDL.

 We're not actually affiliated with RIT - it's just that the UDL is
 approved and endorsed.

So you mean the other two are neither approved nor endorsed?

 They don't really know about the TECH list (other than having read
 about it in this forum).

That's why I said maybe they should be notified. I think they should
be happy to list it.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.49c | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Old Bat bug!

2001-01-27 Thread John Phillips

Marck D. Pearlstone wrote, On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, at 11:29:57 [GMT +] (22:29 
Australian Eastern Time,Saturday):


 It's  about  the  columns  selected for display being too wide for the
 window  and the focus moving to a column which is not fully on screen.
 When  this happens, the screen scrolls sideways to accommodate it. The
 "fixed  for  a while" phenomenon is about selecting a different column
 while  in the other folder and which folders have what columns on show
 at what widths.

JP What is the latest in fixing this bug?

 AFAIAC  it  is  not  a  bug.  It is by design. To "fix" it you have to
 change  your  column  layout,  reducing  the  width of some columns or
 omitting some columns completely so that scrolling is avoided.

 Having  said  that,  when  you expand threads, the subject column gets
 wider and wider until the same horizontal scroll kicks in again.


Following from this, wouldn't it be logical that the focus swings back
to the left if the message thread changes?  At least if it did this,
this "feature" would be more acceptable IMHO.



--
MilliHelen: Amount of beauty required to launch one ship.



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: %TOFNAME for more then one address

2001-01-27 Thread David Buntenbroich

Hello,

Saturday, January 27, 2001, 5:50:10 PM, A. Curtis Martin wrote:

SS What can I do in order to see all my recipients names in the
SS beginning of the message ?

 I don't know of any way to do this. AFAIK, it cannot be done.

How about using a regular expression which filters the recipients'
(first) names from the %TOList macro?

I tried and failed, but my knowledge on regular expressions is very
limited. Maybe someone else would like to try?

I move this to TBTECH.


David

-- 
David Buntenbroich
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.buntenbroich.de

The Bat! 1.49c on Windows NT 5 0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Same messages?

2001-01-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ming-Li,

On  27  January  2001 at 09:42:08 -0800 (which was 17:42 where I live)
Ming-Li wrote and made these points:

ML Pardon my ignorance, but what is UIDL?

Unique  IDentifier  List, a list of Unique Message Identifiers kept by
the POP3 server. Server and clients alike use these IDs to synchronize
between seen and unseen messages under POP3.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]

TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOnMYDjnkJKuSnc2gEQJrHACggfhPPzkQoRHV3ePaR1+jtfkAGdEAn3VR
ohbPLNvqx9utnFqRVyutwCfC
=JpDW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: TB! v1.49 - proper no addressee filter

2001-01-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hello OK3,

On Wednesday, January 24, 2001 19:14:08 [ +0400 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - proper "no addressee" filter':

OK3 String  Location   Presence
OK3 ---
OK3 ^To:KludgesNo

OK3 Having Regular expressions on.

  Placed near the bottom of my SPAM filters, this setting seems to be
  working:

String Location   Presence
--
^To:   Kludgesno
my email add 1 or 2Kludgesyes

Regular expressions on

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Using TB! v1.49
ICQ 41116329



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: TB! v1.49 - proper no addressee filter

2001-01-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hello David, Thanks for your suggestion.

On Wednesday, January 24, 2001 16:13:16 [ +0100 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - proper "no addressee" filter':

David Strings  Location   Presence
David @Recipient  No

  This may, in fact work, but I've found that working with kludges is
  more precise. I've posted what seems to be working for me now. One of
  the gurus on this list may have a better way but without their input
  that is what I'm now using.

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Using TB! v1.49
ICQ 41116329



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Same messages?

2001-01-27 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,

On  Fri, 26 Jan 2001 at 02:13:41 GMT +(which was 1/28/2001 9:13 AM
where you think I live) you told to the list :

ML ... usually (if not all) right after there was an aborted session.
ML Since it's midday, TB shouldn't try to delete anything, and
ML shouldn't have any problem remembering what's downloaded even if a
ML POP session is aborted.

MDP "Aborted"  ... is there a clue there? The server keeps a list of UIDLs
MDP for  messages  left there. I TB seems to keep the list of UIDLs it has
MDP seen and grabs any messages with a UIDL which it hasn't seen before. I
MDP can see this quite clearly in the server logs.

MDP If you get a duplicate message it may be because:

MDP 1. TB didn't record the UIDL when it got the message first time for no
MDPreason.
MDP 2. The server didn't record the UIDL because it thought the download
MDPwas incomplete.
MDP 3. TB didn't record the UIDL because it thought the download was
MDPincomplete.
MDP 4. The message got double relayed in the ISP server hive. (unlikely)

MDP Option  one  and  four  both  seem  equally  unlikely.  There are
MDP probably  other  possible  reasons for UIDLs going missing, but I
MDP can't think of them right now.

There  is: i.e. TB! on normal mode only maintain his own UIDL.DAT only
(not sync with POPServer's UIDL.DAT). If you activate Leave message on
Server,  TB!  UIDL.DAT  sync with POPServer's UIDL.DAT (you may see on
your  MDaemon  logs,  TB! not issue UIDL command on normal mode, while
issue UIDL and TOP command in Leave Message on Server mode). I talk to
Stefan long time ago about this on TBBETA list.

IMHO, there are some advantage/disadvantage using this approach :
- TB! will minimize duplicate messages even if the POPServer not
  support UIDL (Pros)
- You will get duplicate messages when you change from Leave Message
  on Server to Normal Mode or if you abort/cancel mail retrieval.

Some  POPServer  having facility to Delete successful message download
without   waiting  QUIT  command  confirmation,  this  feature  called
"asynchronous  Mode"  (QPOP, Cubic Circle have this feature as default
while on MDaemon, Mercury you may active/deactive this feature). The
current TB! approach will work better perfect if our POPServer support
this feature.

Some  folks  on  UseNet ( I am now in the hot discussion about this on
other  list), mentioned that the current TB! approach much better than
UIDL  mechanism.  It will help much for Dial Up users who have limited
bandwith (low speed connection).

IMHO, I have different opinion about this, for some reason :
1. Fact : not all ISP POPServer support Async. Mode (this is not RFC
   compliance though, and it's hard to force our ISP to support this
   feature due his Customer not only TB! or others Mailer that work
   like TB!G).
2. POPServer not only serve a little user/traffic or we only have a
   few messages on POPmailbox, there is an occasion POPServer very
   busy, on that case the POPServer will delay the deletion when the
   time permitted (he only make something like Watermark that those
   messages will delete ASAP).

I prefer, if possible, TB! will have this approach :
1. Make UIDL Synchronization with POPServer's UIDL (IIRC Eudora have
   this option through changing his *.ini file).
2. Maintain previous UIDL.DAT (from last POP session), and re issue
   DELE command while skipping match UIDL (this work just like MDaemon
   DomainPOP engine).

--
Best regards,

- Syafril -
..Opinion expressed are only mine
*
Name  : Syafril Hermansyah  |Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Voice   : (62) (21) 385-1600
FAXto : (62)(21)351-9241 key:000FAX |URL : http://www.dutaint.co.id
*
Created : Sunday, January 28, 2001, 1:54:48 AM GMT +0700

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Old Bat bug!

2001-01-27 Thread Elden Fenison

Marck,

On Saturday, January 27, 2001, 3:29:57 AM, you wrote:

MDP Having said that, when you expand threads, the subject
MDP column gets wider and wider until the same horizontal scroll
MDP kicks in again.

I have noticed this behaviour as well and thought it was rather
bizarre that The Bat! would widen the subject field on it's own
volition. I would rather expect that I would set it at the width
I prefer and The Bat! would leave it alone.

-- 

 -=Elden=-
 http://www.moondog.org



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Using a template to strip

2001-01-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello Josh,

Historians believe that Sat, 27 Jan 2001 at 13:12:52 GMT -0800 was when,
Josh Rogers [JR] typed the following:

JR Could someone translate this to psuedocode to help me understand it.

Did you see Gerd Ewald's message?  He broke it down into it's
components, I answered him on TBTECH.  If you are not subscribed to
that list, let me know and I'll forward the message to you off-list.

JR Am I close?

JR Look for "(?is).*(^Credit\s*Card.*?$).*payment\s*of\s*(.*?\n)" (I don't
JR understand this string altogether) within string "%TEXT" (which is the text
JR of the original message w/out headers)

Yup.  Read Gerd's message to understand the string.

JR I haven't the foggiest what %SUBPATT="1" and "2" is for though...

We don't want the whole pattern, we only want the important parts.
These parts are stored in subpatterns.  The above macros access just
those patterns.

See the help file under
 - Contents
   - Regular Expressions
 - Regular Expressions Syntax (Advanced)
   - Subpatterns

JR Also, is regexp/regexp tags necessary?

No, I just use them so that the regexp is clearly delineated from the
rest of the message.  You can ignore them completely.

JR When are they necessary?

Never.

snip
-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal

 Using The Bat! 1.49c under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A

 I was the next door kid's imaginary friend.

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Old Bat bug!

2001-01-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hi Marck,

Historians believe that Sat, 27 Jan 2001 at 11:29:57 GMT + was when,
Marck D. Pearlstone [MP] typed the following:

MP It's  about  the  columns  selected for display being too wide for the
MP window  and the focus moving to a column which is not fully on screen.
MP When  this happens, the screen scrolls sideways to accommodate it. The
MP "fixed  for  a while" phenomenon is about selecting a different column
MP while  in the other folder and which folders have what columns on show
MP at what widths.

Note that you can use the scroll bar or ALTLeft Arrow to get back.

-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal

 Using The Bat! 1.49c under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A

 Ok, who is General Relativity, and what did he do with Sir Newton?

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: %TOFNAME for more then one address

2001-01-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello David,

Historians believe that Sat, 27 Jan 2001 at 19:19:32 GMT +0100 was when,
David Buntenbroich [DB] typed the following:

DB How about using a regular expression which filters the recipients'
DB (first) names from the %TOList macro?

You can do that, but you have to set some maximum number of names.  In
this case, that would probably be a bad political move.

DB I tried and failed, but my knowledge on regular expressions is very
DB limited. Maybe someone else would like to try?

Once you get started, this type of pattern is fairly simple, but I'm
not sure this is the best option.  If the recipient list tends to be
5 or more, this expression will become very unwieldy.

-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal

 Using The Bat! 1.49c under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A

 I should probably engage that largish, grey organ lurking inside of my
skull a bit more often. I think it's called a brain.   -- Simon

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Old Bat bug!

2001-01-27 Thread John Phillips

Elden Fenison wrote, On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, at 13:31:09 [GMT -0800] (08:31 Australian 
Eastern Time,Sunday):

 Marck,

 On Saturday, January 27, 2001, 3:29:57 AM, you wrote:

MDP Having said that, when you expand threads, the subject
MDP column gets wider and wider until the same horizontal scroll
MDP kicks in again.

 I have noticed this behaviour as well and thought it was rather
 bizarre that The Bat! would widen the subject field on it's own
 volition. I would rather expect that I would set it at the width
 I prefer and The Bat! would leave it alone.

Agreed.  What I find most annoying about this behaviour is when a new
post arrives to a long thread and the view goes to the right.  What
the hell is the thread / post about before I read it.

I believe The Bat! developers should look at this and correct this
problem, ASAP, puleeze?



-- 
Don't mess with me. You know how I get

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Old Bat bug!

2001-01-27 Thread John Phillips

Januk Aggarwal wrote, On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, at 13:40:41 [GMT -0800] (08:40 Australian 
Eastern Time,Sunday):

 Hi Marck,

 Historians believe that Sat, 27 Jan 2001 at 11:29:57 GMT + was when,
 Marck D. Pearlstone [MP] typed the following:

snipped

 Note that you can use the scroll bar or ALTLeft Arrow to get back.

That is not the point.  You -shouldn't- have to.  And this is not
permanent for the next mail in the pane.


-- 
Yes, I know I'm off topic.

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Old Bat bug!

2001-01-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello John,

Historians believe that Sun, 28 Jan 2001 at 09:24:10 GMT +1100 was when,
John Phillips [JP] typed the following:

 Note that you can use the scroll bar or ALTLeft Arrow to get back.

JP That is not the point.

You suggested that you can *not* get the view back reliably. That is
not true.  I merely pointed out how do to get back from the action of
auto-scroll.

JP You -shouldn't- have to.

Why not?  The feature is this: If a column is partially off-screen,
and you click on that column, then the view scrolls over so you can
see the full column.  What else is TB supposed to assume?  You clicked
on that specific column, so presumably you want to see the information
contained in that column.

To avoid the auto-scroll, click on any *fully* visible column.  Once
you know that this feature exists, this isn't hard.

JP And this is not permanent for the next mail in the pane.

Yes it is.  See above.

-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal

 Using The Bat! 1.49c under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A

 I should probably engage that largish, grey organ lurking inside of my
skull a bit more often. I think it's called a brain.   -- Simon

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Books to learn regular expressions?

2001-01-27 Thread Gerry Doyon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hello All,

Can anyone recommend a good book to learn regular expressions?  I think
someone in this forum recommend the book from O'Reilly.

Which books comes closest to the syntax used for TB!?

Thanks!

- --
Best regards,

- - Gerry Doyon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: Digitally Signed.  -  My PGP key ID is: 0x57F28ABC

iQA/AwUBOnOJMBalOqMy8yvQEQKauACg1lXS3M/t9JyF4eNOiif8pgR4smMAn036
D9b0EOtMDCuZsCWIkimpl5ls
=qduW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Books to learn regular expressions?

2001-01-27 Thread Brian Clark


Hello Gerry, 

(GD == "Gerry Doyon") [EMAIL PROTECTED] inscribed:

GD Can anyone recommend a good book to learn regular expressions? I
GD think someone in this forum recommend the book from O'Reilly.

I had O'Reilly's _Mastering Regular Expressions_ (Owl book) for over a
year, but I've only read half of it. If I, a.k.a. Regular Expression
Gotcha Victim, had to recommend one, that one would be it.

--
...
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-KeyID: 0xE4D0C7C8 Web
Architect, Designer, and Programmer Tel: 864.227.0750
http://www.fusionwerks.com/ Fax: 864.942.7249
...

TB! 1.49c, Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build  A



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Old Bat bug!

2001-01-27 Thread John Phillips

Januk Aggarwal wrote, On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, at 15:11:43 [GMT -0800] (10:11 Australian 
Eastern Time,Sunday):

 Hello John,

 Historians believe that Sun, 28 Jan 2001 at 09:24:10 GMT +1100 was when,
 John Phillips [JP] typed the following:

 Note that you can use the scroll bar or ALTLeft Arrow to get back.

JP That is not the point.

 You suggested that you can *not* get the view back reliably. That is
 not true.  I merely pointed out how do to get back from the action of
 auto-scroll.

JP You -shouldn't- have to.

 Why not?  The feature is this: If a column is partially off-screen,
 and you click on that column, then the view scrolls over so you can
 see the full column.  What else is TB supposed to assume?  You clicked
 on that specific column, so presumably you want to see the information
 contained in that column.

Sorry, where did I say that I clicked on the column.  I did not do
this.  AFAIK, all other mail clients treat this matter, IMHO -
"correctly".  Bat! should conform to the standard (at least in this
matter).

 To avoid the auto-scroll, click on any *fully* visible column.  Once
 you know that this feature exists, this isn't hard.

No problem at present but will give it a try, but, at the risk of
beating a dead horse, and I think there are plenty who will agree with
me, why should I have to?  Why can't Bat! conform to the accepted
standard;  i.e. view always to left of pane?  Is this so hard to do?
Maybe pedantic ones like me could have a choice?

JP And this is not permanent for the next mail in the pane.

 Yes it is.  See above.

See above.


-- 
I've plummeted to my death and I can't get up.

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org